Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US disposal of CH-47D’s

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US disposal of CH-47D’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jul 2021, 19:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,891
Received 2,829 Likes on 1,207 Posts
US disposal of CH-47D’s

I don’t know if this has been seen, as the US moved over to the CH-47F the older D were Scrapped… what a waste.


NutLoose is online now  
Old 16th Jul 2021, 19:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 508 Likes on 211 Posts
It just does not make a lot of sense....surely they have some value on Fire Fighting Contracts under a Restricted Category authorization.
SASless is online now  
Old 16th Jul 2021, 19:14
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,891
Received 2,829 Likes on 1,207 Posts
Agreed, surely they could have been refurbished to F standard as well?
NutLoose is online now  
Old 16th Jul 2021, 20:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Federal government bureaucratic decisions are not based on logic nor financial propriety. Never have been, never will be. It has always been thus. Sad. Just sad. Amazon.com wastes even more on a near-daily basis.
evansb is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2021, 20:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
A large number were rebuilt to F standard, but that involved a new fuselage structure (so how much is rebuild is a moot point, but it gets approval faster!)
Davef68 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2021, 20:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Emptying the litter bin
Age: 65
Posts: 409
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not just the military. Was working in a covid test center. Government removed funding for the test centers at educational establishments. I asked if the £3million worth of kit was going to be given to the local NHS trust for use in NHS centers. Was informed that they had approached them, but they had refused them. Allegedly the logic behind this refusal - which I can quite believe - was if the local trusts took £3 million worth of kit from us, then come next year at budget time £3 million would be cut from the budgets. Thus that equipment is sitting a store waiting to go life ex, and then be destroyed.
PICKS135 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2021, 22:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: J-land
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I was on active duty back in the late 80's most all the "D's" were refurbed A/B/C airframes... So many of the "D's" have a lots of wear and tear on the actual structures... Because the increased Gross weight of the D was much greater than the original A we did have stress fractures in some structural areas... New Airframes really have been need for quite some time...
jpn crj driver is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2021, 05:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,934
Received 392 Likes on 207 Posts
Would have made great caravans, complete with ramp for the runabout.




megan is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2021, 08:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
I seem to recall that when Wildcat was replacing Lynx (whose barrel was supposed to form the basis of the rework), Leonardo made new barrels as it was cheaper and more realistic.
Old Duffer
Old-Duffer is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2021, 10:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Old-Duffer
I seem to recall that when Wildcat was replacing Lynx (whose barrel was supposed to form the basis of the rework), Leonardo made new barrels as it was cheaper and more realistic.
At least something was learned from the Nimrod MR2-->MRA4 upgrade

Upgrading manually metal-bashed fuselages with CAD/CAM exact modules is a recipe for failure...
Cyberhacker is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2021, 11:05
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,891
Received 2,829 Likes on 1,207 Posts
I would have thought quite a lot of US museums would have loved one.
NutLoose is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.