Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Puma helicopter 50th anniversary paint scheme unveiled

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Puma helicopter 50th anniversary paint scheme unveiled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2021, 16:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,819
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,191 Posts
Puma helicopter 50th anniversary paint scheme unveiled

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/puma...heme-unveiled/

I was thinking, well that's another slap a bit of paint on the tail and call it done, then I realised the aircraft has been put back into the 70's scheme and it looks grand for it... deceptive but a joy to see, a full scheme. Niice one.






NutLoose is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 16:22
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,819
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,191 Posts
I won't even mention they have the flag on the stb side upside down.... Ohh I just did, oh well.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 16:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Looking north out to sea
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
The Union Flag is always deemed to be seen flying with the flagstaff on the left. If seen from the other side, it will seem to be upside down.

And oh dear.... How the young grow old. First flown Nov 82 out of Gutersloh. Just me and the crewman.

Me
ItsonlyMeagain is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 17:38
  #4 (permalink)  
JetBlast member 2005.
JetBlast member 2006.
Banned 2007
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The US of A - sort of
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wait ... the stbd side is correct, so I assume the port side is wrong


well on reflection (no pun intended) the Americans do show the back of the flag on the starboard side so maybe you're right
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh! is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 17:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,687
Received 846 Likes on 490 Posts
If it wobbles as it starts like the 230 Sqn Pumas I rode in did, at least it will be waving the flag,
Ninthace is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 17:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,806
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
1. The stbd UJ is indeed correct, assuming the notional flagpole is aft of the airframe.

2. A tasteful scheme overall though. ✔️

Last edited by MPN11; 6th Jul 2021 at 18:10.
MPN11 is online now  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 18:02
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,819
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,191 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!
wait ... the stbd side is correct, so I assume the port side is wrong


well on reflection (no pun intended) the Americans do show the back of the flag on the starboard side so maybe you're right
Yes, it’s supposed to be as flying from a flagpole at the front of the aircraft, so it would be the back of the flag as you put it. It amazes me in this day and age and the fact that no doubt the design would have been back and forward up and down the food chain before being approved, you think one of them would have the spotted it.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 18:04
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,819
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,191 Posts
Mpn on aircraft as on a ship the “flagpole” goes to the front, so it is wrong, however that does not detract from a super scheme.



NutLoose is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 18:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,806
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
You are of course correct, and it would look ‘nicer’ and more natural if viewed from the port side. 👍
MPN11 is online now  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 18:37
  #10 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 417 Likes on 220 Posts
XW224 - I last flew her in September 1983. She and all her stable mates have been given a fair bit more power since those days...the engines they always needed!

But where did those 38 years go?
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 19:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
XW224 - I last flew her in September 1983. She and all her stable mates have been given a fair bit more power since those days...the engines they always needed!

But where did those 38 years go?
PCSF and 230 also 38 years ago.
matkat is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 19:29
  #12 (permalink)  
JetBlast member 2005.
JetBlast member 2006.
Banned 2007
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The US of A - sort of
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Yes, it’s supposed to be as flying from a flagpole at the front of the aircraft, so it would be the back of the flag as you put it. It amazes me in this day and age and the fact that no doubt the design would have been back and forward up and down the food chain before being approved, you think one of them would have the spotted it.
It wasn't spotted on the Typhoon where the flag was painted underneath, but the port and starboard wings were mirror images of each other, so one was always wrong regardless of where the pole was

In any event am I allowed to ask what'll happen once Scotland leaves?
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh! is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 20:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Interesting routing....

diginagain is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2021, 20:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 631
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by diginagain
Interesting routing....
Whoever drew that up has failed in their application to join Gapan.
VX275 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2021, 09:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I started flying XW224 around NI in April 1973.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2021, 12:19
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by VX275
Whoever drew that up has failed in their application to join Gapan.
Perhaps there's still a lot of faith in the map-reading skills of the bloke in the back?
diginagain is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2021, 15:00
  #17 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 417 Likes on 220 Posts
Well, the Puma 10 ship appeared just about on time and on track over Nottinghamshire so they obviously used a better map than that one.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 7th Jul 2021, 16:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Well, the Puma 10 ship appeared just about on time and on track over Nottinghamshire so they obviously used a better map than that one.
Give it time. Anyone warned Monaghan?
diginagain is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2021, 16:14
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cayley's County - Yorkshire
Posts: 291
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts
Puma 50th Tour @ Scampton

There was a good turnout at Scampton, with all ten helicopters arriving. (XW214 had a delayed lift, catching up with the rest en route).
Here are some of my photos. There was a very moody sky providing the background to approaching photos, clearing to a blue sky shooting them once passed.

The second five flew back to Waddington to refuel, subsequently rejoining the others around Newark on the second leg










CAEBr is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2021, 16:18
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,819
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,191 Posts
Superb, I was hoping they would have transited close to EGNX as they were passing Nottingham Derby area but sadly not.
NutLoose is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.