Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Boeing H-47ER 2 billion deal agreed

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Boeing H-47ER 2 billion deal agreed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Apr 2021, 20:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,144
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
RAF Boeing H-47ER 2 billion deal agreed

So it’s agreed for the Boeing H-47ER 2BN purchase deal.

https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...k-helicopters/

Exciting time ahead for Odiham and Benson

Leta get cracking with AAR oh hang on we retiring the Herk,

cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 13th May 2021, 15:57
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,144
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
And now

https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles...Fv9jpyMFrINUMI

A £1.4 billion contract to modernise the Chinook fleet over the next 10 years has been agreed. The deal will see British forces benefit from 14 of the latest iconic heavy-lift helicopters.

Proven in battle and operated in every major conflict since the Falklands War, the Chinook is a highly-versatile aircraft. The helicopter can operate in a diverse range of environments, from the desert to the arctic, and transport up to 55 personnel or ten tonnes of cargo.

With a top speed of 300 kilometres per hour, the new H-47(ER) aircraft will have a range of new capabilities, including:

- an advanced digital cockpit
- a modernised airframe to increase stability and improve survivability
- a digital automatic flight control system to allow pilots to hover in areas of limited visibility

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said: “From assisting emergency repairs to UK flood defences, providing vital logistics support during COVID-19 to its warfighting role on Afghan battlefields, the Chinook has been the workhorse of the Armed Forces for over 40 years. The cutting edge H-47 (ER) will be at the forefront of our specialist requirements in dealing with threats and logistic support. Our £1.4 billion investment will mean we will be one of very few air forces with this capability.”

Full story: https://bit.ly/2QaFcKg
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 13th May 2021, 18:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 684
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by chopper2004
Leta get cracking with AAR oh hang on we retiring the Herk,
Although...

hoodie is offline  
Old 13th May 2021, 20:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
Well done Airbus - Nice to see the rotorheads still attached.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 14th May 2021, 07:46
  #5 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,384
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Exciting time ahead for Odiham and Benson
In a while….

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2021...full-delivery/

LONDON — Britain has confirmed it will acquire 14 Boeing-made Chinook helicopters, but the government has prolonged the delivery schedule over the next decade years due to budget issues.

The deal was made through the U.S. Defense Department’s Foreign Military Sales process and will see Britain pay £1.4 billion (U.S. $2 billion) for the helicopters and associated equipment. Deliveries are scheduled to start in 2026 and be completed in 2030.

That’s about three years behind the original plan, as the British Defence Ministry has prioritized more pressing modernization needs ahead of the helo acquisition….
ORAC is online now  
Old 14th May 2021, 11:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
My maths is quite flaky but 100 million a helicopter seems quite a lot even if it does include support equipment.
ASRAAMTOO is offline  
Old 14th May 2021, 11:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
I’m well out of the loop these days on these things, but a genuine question over costs. The Seattle Time article notes the US Army is saving close to $1Bn by cutting 28 cabs, yet we’re paying close to $2Bn to buy 14?
What am I missing because they seem very expensive for SH at those prices.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 14th May 2021, 12:11
  #8 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,384
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
When did £1.4B become “close” to £2B? I’ve heard of inflation, but that’s ridiculous….

I would imagine the contract includes spare engines, spares, software, manuals, support, training etc, plus the UK extras such as radar - But for details we will have to wait for the FMS contract to be published.
ORAC is online now  
Old 14th May 2021, 12:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
When did £1.4B become “close” to £2B? I’ve heard of inflation, but that’s ridiculous….

I would imagine the contract includes spare engines, spares, software, manuals, support, training etc, plus the UK extras such as radar - But for details we will have to wait for the FMS contract to be published.
£1.4Bn isn’t close to £2Bn, but it is far closer to $2Bn US - which is my question.

But I await with interest to see where the rest of the charges come from. As one of the biggest CH-47 operators in the world, it’s not like we’re starting from scratch here.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 14th May 2021, 14:26
  #10 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by Melchett01
I’m well out of the loop these days on these things, but a genuine question over costs. The Seattle Time article notes the US Army is saving close to $1Bn by cutting 28 cabs, yet we’re paying close to $2Bn to buy 14?
What am I missing because they seem very expensive for SH at those prices.
I think it's been known for a while that the US costs per airframe and UK programme costs are formulated totally differently, so you're definitely not comparing fruit with fruit with that comparison - UK often includes support, training and spares costs in the same overall bill, sometimes along with simulators, whereas I'm not even sure the US considers the rubber on the tyres in what they say the airframe cost is!

Also, you're not comparing the same type of aircraft there, if you look at the options list that was in the FMS approval the H-47(ER) referred to above is definitely not a standard off the shelf F-model as used by the US Army.​​​​
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 14th May 2021, 14:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,864
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
Plus there will be the 7 years of storage costs and the demodding of the cockpit to consider.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 14th May 2021, 14:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 249
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
...and when looking at costs, don't forget to price in a new Sim with 20+ years through-life support. They are not cheap (but worth every penny IMHO)
Baldeep Inminj is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2021, 22:47
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
FMS delivery order via US Special Operations Command for 14 x Chinook Block 2 for UK at $580,598,636 to be delivered by July 2026

MediaRoom - News Releases/Statements
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 19:18
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,144
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
Been approved by his goodself

https://www.forces.net/technology/we...-fly-twice-far

cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 19:49
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,275
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts
We have been discussing the H-47ER deal including today's announcement on the SDSR thread. Mods, just wondering if it makes sense to move the relevant posts here?

Start from about here:
UK Strategic Defence Review 2020 - get your bids in now ladies & gentsl
SLXOwft is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Mar 2024, 20:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
ASRAAM - Have a look at the DSCA note when this deal was agreed. Take a gander at the complexity of the role equipment and work out which birds these are….worth every dime…https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/maj...nd-accessories
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 22:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
With the government buying 14 new ones does that mean they will retire the current fleet.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2024, 00:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by N707ZS
With the government buying 14 new ones does that mean they will retire the current fleet.
Plan is to retire some of the older aircraft, but these are specifically SF configured aircraft. Think MH-47G-like
Davef68 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2024, 08:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 520
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
Plan is to retire some of the older aircraft, but these are specifically SF configured aircraft. Think MH-47G-like
I think that was the case before £350 million was magically shaved off the contract cost. I can't imagine where they got such a saving without watering down some of the SF configuration.
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2024, 09:18
  #20 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,384
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
As always, there's a bit of a mystery on the air to air refueling part. DE&S in its post notes the ER is capable of refueling in flight. This is only true-true if the probe is fitted; we were not expecting it to be. Wonder if renegotiation included a rethink on that somehow...?




​​​​​​​
ORAC is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.