Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Grumman Avenger down in Cocoa Beach, Florida

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Grumman Avenger down in Cocoa Beach, Florida

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Apr 2021, 09:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: glasgow
Posts: 297
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
A good amount of paint came off the starboard fuselage just ahead of the tail too. Depressing to see just how second hand she looks after such a gentle ditching and short immersion.
falcon900 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 10:03
  #22 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,613
Received 289 Likes on 158 Posts
I think emergency gear extension is free fall, plus maybe some "G" to lock down - looked to me like it was sitting on the seafloor almost immediately after it stopped.
treadigraph is online now  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 10:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
I think emergency gear extension is free fall, plus maybe some "G" to lock down - looked to me like it was sitting on the seafloor almost immediately after it stopped.
Makes sense, thanks. I wondered about an air bottle or some such.

CG
charliegolf is online now  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 11:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by sycamore
Think the climb might have been last lot of flaps down,and just avoiding the swimmer...
However,it was a good ditching,but..
Open the canopies before touchdown..
Wear a lifejacket operating over the sea...
Wear a `hard-hat`,as the canopy rail runs right across the top....
and if you don`t and it had turned over....would`ve been possibly a different outcome....but ,hey ..ya gotta look good climbing out....shame he`s not wearing Randolphs...

Oh ,yes ,I do have TBM display time,and over the `oggin....and Randolphs...
The pilot that lost his life when he ditched that P-47D in the Hudson river after engine failure a few years ago, likely lost his life because he failed to jettison the canopy prior to hitting the water, as per SOP and was trapped inside as the aircraft then sank.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 13:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A bit battered and bruised...
Valiant Air Command, Inc. gives an update on the N108Q Avenger accident that occurred on April 17th in Cocoa Beach, FL:

"After much effort, we have managed to fold both of the wings, place her on the trailer, and strap her down, ready for travel. This was accomplished despite mother nature throwing some curve balls with the weather. We are now waiting for the necessary permits to move her home.

Thank you to the volunteers who assisted with this, along with the security forces and fire services at the Patrick Space Force Base.

Nige321 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 14:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,836
Received 2,804 Likes on 1,194 Posts
Prop looks like it might straighten. as for gear freefalling I was surprised they never tried it before lifting, then as it rose they could pull it manually down and lock it, that way they would have had the gear to put it down on when lowering out of the sea, but I don't know the system it uses.. Cowl paint simply hasn't adhered to the primer, that would have eventually shown itself up.

Last edited by NutLoose; 20th Apr 2021 at 14:24.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 16:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,660
Received 68 Likes on 43 Posts
CG/Treads/Nutty,..the gear can be lowered by using the handpump; if that fails there is an `unlock the uplocks`` handle ,and it should freefall with springs assistance...likewise the wings can be folded by the same handpump,but is `knackering`....don`t ask...!
sycamore is online now  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 16:56
  #28 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,613
Received 289 Likes on 158 Posts
Sycamore, I assume you never flew Stephen Grey's Wildcat? I think the standard method of undercarriage retraction/extension involved a considerable number of turns on a cranking mechanism, with the facility to crack yer knuckles if your hand slipped...

If Lomcevak reads this, he can probably confirm the first bit, hopefully not the second!
treadigraph is online now  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 21:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,836
Received 2,804 Likes on 1,194 Posts
That’s correct for the wildcat. But this isn’t one.

update.

Avenger was hydraulic with back up hand pump and free fall emergency facility, found the TBF1 manual here

https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/thread...andbook.38589/
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 23:19
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
I owned and flew my TBM Avenger for 20 years. The gear is hydraulic and the emergency extension is pull the uplocks manually and free fall. Agree our man should have opened the canopy. Lots of damage to that aircraft particularly underneath.
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 08:05
  #31 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,613
Received 289 Likes on 158 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
That’s correct for the wildcat. But this isn’t one.
Apologies, I didn't intend to suggest the Avenger uses the same gear retraction system as the Avenger - rather that the Wildcat's (and presumably the earlier pigeon-chested Grumman biplanes) standard method of gear retraction was as knackering as the backup system in the Avenger (I think I recall 40 turns being required to stow it)... and some people profess to enjoy flying it...!
treadigraph is online now  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 11:36
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Seems to me that most of the damage to the tail must have been done during the recovery operation.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 11:41
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Interesting photo's appearing elsewhere taken from their B-25 of the formation enroute to Cocoa Beach and its quite clear that there is an obvious blue smoke trail coming from the TBM before even getting to Cooca Beach.



GeeRam is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 11:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,614
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
Looks like an extraordianrlily hazardous place for a forced landing with all those swimmers who would be invisible until the last moment. As it was he seems to have only narrowly missed a couple, and there was a whole crowd of them just ahead of where they stopped. Fifty yards further out and there would have been no hazard to 3rd parties...but a sunken airframe. I wonder if that was a factor in landing so very close to the beach.


meleagertoo is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 13:49
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
Looks like an extraordianrlily hazardous place for a forced landing with all those swimmers who would be invisible until the last moment. As it was he seems to have only narrowly missed a couple, and there was a whole crowd of them just ahead of where they stopped. Fifty yards further out and there would have been no hazard to 3rd parties...but a sunken airframe. I wonder if that was a factor in landing so very close to the beach.
Possibly.
Plus pilot also not appearing to be wearing any life vest/preserver for an over water display, so again not wanting to be risking ditching in deeper water?
GeeRam is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 14:00
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,836
Received 2,804 Likes on 1,194 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
Apologies, I didn't intend to suggest the Avenger uses the same gear retraction system as the Avenger - rather that the Wildcat's (and presumably the earlier pigeon-chested Grumman biplanes) standard method of gear retraction was as knackering as the backup system in the Avenger (I think I recall 40 turns being required to stow it)... and some people profess to enjoy flying it...!
No, not your error, mine, I was in a rush so just put a short answer that may have appeared a tad abrupt, one meant to post a longer version later but fell asleep.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 14:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,836
Received 2,804 Likes on 1,194 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Seems to me that most of the damage to the tail must have been done during the recovery operation.
and the wing, though bouncing up and down in the surf you don't know what its beating itself against, the missing bomb door for one
NutLoose is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 14:22
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,614
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
You can see in Airbubba's first pic how the flaps are folded under the wing by it being dragged out of the oggin and up the beach. It will have suffered quite a bit more damage in that process before it got close enough to a crane on a hard surface to be able to lift it (and that rather brutally by the looks of it). The steel hawser has chewed up the engine firewall pretty badly.
No lifejacket. No helmet. Canopy closed.
Hmmm.
I'll await the NTSB's views on very nearly landing on top of swimmers instead of a safe distance offshore with interest.
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 15:41
  #39 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,613
Received 289 Likes on 158 Posts
I've seen it suggested elsewhere that he was hoping to get it down on Patrick AFB's runway, but didn't get quite close enough. Looking at the pic in Nige321's post above, the ditching appears to have taken place adjacent to the beach side car park in the centre of the map here - about half a mile short and with the beach and A1A to cross.

Watched Discovery launch from KSC from around that spot in September '88 - a bonus was watching a U-2 launch from Patrick a short while before (a U-2 and not a TR-1!).
treadigraph is online now  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 16:44
  #40 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
All the the want of a bit more altitude. There's 5 substantial runways within a 20 miles radius of the ditching point, but if you can't there, you can't there.
Two's in is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.