Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Red Arrows are safe after Ministry of Defence plans to retire entire fleet of 76 Hawk

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Red Arrows are safe after Ministry of Defence plans to retire entire fleet of 76 Hawk

Old 29th Mar 2021, 07:59
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 25,853
We will enhance the new military flying training system with further investment in synthetic training that will deliver more capable pilots more quickly and more efficiently
Hasn't the US just published a damning report concernng over-reliance on synthetic flight training?
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2021, 23:48
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,098
They have, BEagle, and yet I can't find a blessed link for it anywhere!
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 00:15
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 913
Could this be the one? I am sure there will be others.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...odels-training
SATCOS WHIPPING BOY is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 09:33
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,098
I thought I'd seen something since that, and more 'official'.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 10:22
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 71
Posts: 1,525
The first ever national aerobatic team with a mix of inhabited vehicles and "loyal wingmen"?

No , I can't see it either!
Haraka is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2021, 11:26
  #86 (permalink)  
xtp
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 37
I seem to remember similar conclusions from their ASUPT programme in the 1970s.
xtp is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2021, 14:05
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somerset
Posts: 53
Is this the report?
https://www.militaryaviationsafety.gov/
There's a section on pilot training from p59
Watson1963 is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2021, 17:19
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 289
Even if it is not the report to which BEagle referred, even on the basis of a quick skim it presents clear views on the role of synthetic training as a necessary part of they system that needs to be kept up to date for all in service types. However, there is a necessary levelof real flying that needs to be done.

Constrained budgets, decreased aircraft availability, instructor pilot shortages, and reduced training range availability have led to greater simulator usage. The Commission heard concerns from pilots in all the Services about the increased use of simulation in lieu of actual flying. Recognizing that simulation is a cost-effective flight training tool, it is a supplement or enhancement, not a replacement, for actual flight training. There is great value in both.(My emphases) Simulators cannot replicate carrier landings or simulate G-forces, but they do provide the safest environment for training on emergency procedures and aircrew coordination. Achieving the proper balance between actual flight and simulator training is crucial for both safety and readiness.For simulators to be effective, they must mirror the specifications of the aircraft they simulate. In many cases, units lack simulators with the same configurations and flight characteristics as the actual aircraft. Several units reported that contracts limit simulator availability and do not provide the engineering support necessary to keep their simulators operating and up to date. This results in “negative training,” pilots practicing skills contrary to how they would employ them in actual flight.

FINDING: In many units, the minimum flight hour requirements for currency are not being met, leading to flight waivers that are increasing risks and impacting the safety culture of military aviation.

FINDING: Simulators are an essential tool for training military aviation professionals. Installations have outdated and out-of-service simulators.

I suspect the bean counters may be too convinced by the financial input comparision to concentrate on the effectiveness of the ouput.

SLXOwft is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2021, 20:48
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 183
Couldn’t the display be carried out by drones, as an encouragement for people to join the RAF as drone pilots, which would seem the way to go.
haltonapp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.