Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-18 Ski-Jump Trials

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-18 Ski-Jump Trials

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Dec 2020, 23:43
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK on a crosswind
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
You can probably get airborne - as long as you don’t want to go anywhere or carry anything....
Then why would they bother running the tests. They seem to be trying to get an order from the Indians so the aircraft would have to be operationally capable.
Royalistflyer is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2020, 23:47
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by Royalistflyer
Then why would they bother running the tests. They seem to be trying to get an order from the Indians so the aircraft would have to be operationally capable.
As with the old joke about wildlife phots and the.lions, the Bug only has to be better than/cheaper than the Fulcrum or the Rafale.....
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Old 28th Dec 2020, 09:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,409
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
Originally Posted by Thud_and_Blunder
Wasn't the Breguet 121 originally proposed as a NATO light-fighter replacement for all the Sabres and F84s rattling around? Competition eventually won by the Fiat G91. I can remember reading in 'Look and Learn' back in the 60s about the Jaguar being the replacement for the Gnat in AFTS service, too.

I think it was Gunston who pointed out that the french wanted a strike aircraft, the British a trainer and then French used all of them for training and the British all of them for strike................
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2020, 09:21
  #24 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
As with the old joke about wildlife phots and the.lions, the Bug only has to be better than/cheaper than the Fulcrum or the Rafale.....
https://thewire.in/security/another-...ub-to-the-fore
ORAC is online now  
Old 28th Dec 2020, 09:23
  #25 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
I think it was Gunston who pointed out that the french wanted a strike aircraft, the British a trainer and then French used all of them for training and the British all of them for strike................
Alas, untrue.....

https://tinyurl.com/ycrx37y6
ORAC is online now  
Old 28th Dec 2020, 17:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ORAC
Surely that says more about the quality of the 'requirements' write up than on the actual requirements.
etudiant is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2021, 19:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: lgw
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The French Jag on the carrier trial only had one main-wheel per main axle. Was that a pre-preproduction model as UK and French front line models had double bogey main wheels per axle?
factanonverba is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2021, 20:15
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,662
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Probably because the land version was supposed to go `off-piste`occasionally; not usually muddy or grassy on a tin-tub....
sycamore is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.