Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

What Military Aircraft Would You Bring Back To Service?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What Military Aircraft Would You Bring Back To Service?

Old 28th Oct 2020, 19:06
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,183
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
There are a few that might actually offer useful capabilities:

Canberra PR9, Nimrod R1 and looking ahead - how about Sentinel?
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2020, 19:47
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: pluto
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by typerated
.......a much more realistic answer to NATO's vulnerable airfields than Harrier ever could be.
You would have hole a lot of concrete to stop Viggens flying from an airfield!
You wouldn't be able to stop Harriers flying - tarmac, tin, grass, ships.






blimey is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2020, 19:50
  #123 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 413 Likes on 218 Posts
Devil

Originally Posted by Two's in
My first piloting experience was in a Blanik at RAF Odiham with an RAF instructor. Of course it was in RAF service. Did some really good engine off landings as well...
I reckon ALL Blanik landings were engines off...
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2020, 20:02
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Devon
Age: 79
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Fully agree with JACKONICKO on PR9. No real knowledge of Sentinel, but always thought PR9 (and guessing Sentinel) could be outperformed in peacetime/pseudo-peacetime roles, by later models of Gulfstream - further and faster and as high as you'd need for most purposes.
12in95 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2020, 20:23
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bristol
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
For me it would have to be a Hawker Hunter TMk8. The first aircraft of any type that I ever flew in. From RNAS Yeovilton in 1977. Pilot Brian Grant. From Yeovilton over Devon and Cornwall and the Scillies to RV with the Cruiser HMS Blake in the Western approaches. She was just out of refit, - to assist in Radar calibration. That was a hell of a first flight!

TF
tigerfish is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2020, 22:24
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Hoddy
LOMCEVAK - need a back seater?
Hoddy, you are definitely in! That really would be winding the clocks back!
LOMCEVAK is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 01:24
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by blimey
You wouldn't be able to stop Harriers flying - tarmac, tin, grass, ships.
Yes you would!

Do you know how many vehicles were required to support the Germany Sqn's operating off base?

We could not afford the logistical tail

typerated is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 01:42
  #128 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,475
Received 99 Likes on 57 Posts
F-111 for sure, but I'd like to have seen the CAC CA-15 in operational service.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 06:13
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by typerated
Yes you would!

Do you know how many vehicles were required to support the Germany Sqn's operating off base?

We could not afford the logistical tail
I remember my Flt Sgt's comment on watching the convoy packets streamimg out of the gate en route to the fiield from Gutersloh.

"Where's the piano ?"
Haraka is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 08:28
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 54
Posts: 206
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Sentinel most definitely not out performed by (comparable) Gulfstreams....can't answer for PR9.

But Sentinel has been a sad tale of lack of investment and slow decline since SDSR 2010. Such a waste of a useful asset.
DCThumb is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 09:45
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moraira,spain-Norfolk, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the B-58, with modern engines.
Saw one at an air display once, rolled straight after
take off and then left in a noisy hurry.
esa-aardvark is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 10:14
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by possel
I never saw the BAC.221 fly, but I did see it trying to fly at Farnborough in 1964 when it aborted its take-off on the Saturday!
Obviously ran short of fuel.
When being ferried between Bedford and Farnborough, Benson had to be alerted in case it got short of fuel and needed to divert.
chevvron is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 10:35
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boeing Jet
Just passing the time away for fun, if possible what aircraft would you bring back to service mine would be the Vulcan!!
I am proud to have worked on the Vulcan, an experience I shall remember for the rest of my life. Glorious, and impressive at public displays. No way I would bring it back - incredibly labour intensive to maintain by today's standards, not to mention needing 5 aircrew to operate. But I am so glad to have been a little part of its life.
kiwibrit is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 11:32
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The South
Posts: 304
Received 54 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Amen.

What a loss, what sh1t decisions.
Agreed. A unique and wonderful bit of kit and we gave it away.
Timmy Tomkins is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 11:34
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kings Lynn
Age: 81
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct, last trip 2 Jan 1980!!
Hoddy is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 11:41
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Starring at an Airfield Near you
Posts: 371
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
I'm going to take 2 bites of the cherry here; one really vintage one veteren:

Originally I was with Capt Radar with the Mosquito - but then reflected, 'it did have a few foibles' so I reasoned: Take a Mosquito, put it on a severe diet, nearly double the horsepower but give it handed engines to make it go in straight line on take-off and landing and improve handling even more, plus a minor restyle to make it look even more rakish and - Voila - you have a Hornet. What's not to like?

For the newer one - I opine XT272; the Buccaneer fitted with the Tornado GR1 nose and avionics. You know, the one that was an embarrassment to the Fin's programme and, once the test flying was complete, had to be cut and destroyed to remove the evidence........
Downwind.Maddl-Land is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 11:46
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,501
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Quietplease
As a twenty year old you couldn’t have more fun (in the air) than a Meteor 8.

I agree to that, especially roaring around in the Troodos Mountains, trying to unsettle the EOKA members living there..i

Last edited by brakedwell; 30th Oct 2020 at 06:04.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 12:17
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,754
Received 2,738 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Originally Posted by Downwind.Maddl-Land
I'm going to take 2 bites of the cherry here; one really vintage one veteren:

Originally I was with Capt Radar with the Mosquito - but then reflected, 'it did have a few foibles' so I reasoned: Take a Mosquito, put it on a severe diet, nearly double the horsepower but give it handed engines to make it go in straight line on take-off and landing and improve handling even more, plus a minor restyle to make it look even more rakish and - Voila - you have a Hornet. What's not to like?

For the newer one - I opine XT272; the Buccaneer fitted with the Tornado GR1 nose and avionics. You know, the one that was an embarrassment to the Fin's programme and, once the test flying was complete, had to be cut and destroyed to remove the evidence........
Instead of wood if you went the Mossie route, use carbon fibre and a couple of Turboprops, , you would struggle to double the HP unless you nailed some Griffons in and that wold screw up the C of G
NutLoose is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 16:13
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,501
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Instead of wood if you went the Mossie route, use carbon fibre and a couple of Turboprops, , you would struggle to double the HP unless you nailed some Griffons in and that wold screw up the C of G
I agree, there were a couple of Hornets wrecks lying in Changi, almost completely delaminated due to the climate.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2020, 22:09
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 244
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If I remember correctly, Winkle Brown described the Hornet as “overpowered perfection”

Just need to rectify the delamination issues experienced in the tropics
layman is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.