Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

What Military Aircraft Would You Bring Back To Service?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What Military Aircraft Would You Bring Back To Service?

Old 26th Oct 2020, 02:13
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 154
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Herod
If it was possible to bring back the era as well, the Handley-Page HP 42...42
If we’re talking eras, surely the Connies and Super Connies were the epitome of glamour. The shape was almost Art Deco, with steam-driven everything, flying to what was then exotic destinations and a frisson of danger as well!


JustinHeywood is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 02:58
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: west aust'
Age: 60
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
mk 2 carbon concorde .
laardvark is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 03:37
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Gerloz
Posts: 875
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Bristol frightener
MENELAUS is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 04:58
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tasmania and High Wollemi
Posts: 439
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F111 with updated ECM. Was bought for a reason
catseye is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 06:52
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deferring to an Expert

I’ve done only a little piloting myself, so I’m going to defer to Eric Winkle Brown. His favourites were the Sabre and DH Sea Hornet. The Sabre is still extant here and there, in private hands. So for me it’s got to be the Hornet that’s brought back.

As a passenger (though I imagine a fair number of pilots would fancy it too) it’d have to be Concorde.

As an engineer, it’s a close run between SR71 and F117. There are reports that the latter is still occasionally in the skies, so the SR71 gets that vote. They’re my favourite engineering examples, because they’re both extreme illustrations of what happens when engineers are let off the leash and left to get on with it. The SR71 simply because it was so fast, and the F117 simply because it was barely an aeroplane but still flew, was also stealthy, and was also so incredibly cheap (I’m not talking sticker price). $30million for two flying prototypes, even in late 70’s money, was very cheap indeed.

Last edited by msbbarratt; 26th Oct 2020 at 07:20.
msbbarratt is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 07:21
  #46 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 98 Likes on 69 Posts
The Sunderland.......on the basis there was plenty of room to walk about / space to sleep in, and, by far the most essential item....had a very well equipped galley.

It's all about priorities and creature comforts you understand
Krystal n chips is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 07:43
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: in the sky
Posts: 154
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would go for the MiG-25 Foxbat.
Yes it was built as well as a BL car, yes it was crude and yes it was Soviet. But it was stupidly fast 2.8M climbed like a fallen Angel, looked evil.
I am a bit biased, I had a back seat ride in one 15 years or so ago thanks to a broker and lots of my childrens inheritance.
But by God it was just bloody awesome, then again when you drive a Boeing for work, I suppose any fast jet is!
Brian Pern is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 07:55
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
SR71 BlackBird, F14 Tomcat, Harrier
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 08:11
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 54
Posts: 108
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I’m stuck in the 70’s & 80’s so if I could pause time, all of them.
NIREP reader is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 08:16
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EGOS Field 24
Posts: 1,111
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by WB627
Come on chaps & chapesses, we all know what we realy need ........ Kirby Cadet MkIII
No, no, no. We need the mighty Vigilant, with a glass cockpit and re-engined with a Rotax...er...
ACW599 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 08:48
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-130K. Preferably at Lyneham, or better still Thorney Island!
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 09:00
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
DeHavilland Venom, specifically the FB4.

We all have our quirks.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 10:05
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by c52
VC-10 without a doubt - well, maybe quite a lot of doubt.
For long range maybe, but for short range (domestic) flights it has to be the Trident; equally fast if not faster.
Both aircraft were faster than modern day airliners.
chevvron is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 10:07
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by sharpend
A re-engined refurbished VC10. Fast, the right size to take an army company somewhere and a great tanker (3 hoses).
In the mid '70s, the Chinese wanted 'em re-engined with a pair of RB211s having seen the RB211 testbed.
chevvron is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 10:10
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by pulse1
How about T21 and T31 gliders? Let's get the kids all over the country flying solo again.
I'll drink to that; already suggested in the 2 Air Cadet gliding threads.
I spent many hours flying both types and introducing younger cadets to flying.
chevvron is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 10:45
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,576
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Can't believe no-one has mentioned the Wiggins Aerodyne yet...

dead_pan is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 10:47
  #57 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 413 Likes on 218 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
For long range maybe, but for short range (domestic) flights it has to be the Trident; equally fast if not faster.
Both aircraft were faster than modern day airliners.
That's "progress"!
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 10:56
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grumman F2F - just a big radial engine with fins.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 11:10
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Eastbourne
Age: 85
Posts: 84
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mosquito PR

My vote goes with a PR Mosquito. Cheap, fast at low level, very small radar signature. Flying PR Canberras in early 60s Germany we reckoned that a Mossy could do all that we could - and come back several times.
Four Turbo is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2020, 11:19
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,753
Received 2,731 Likes on 1,163 Posts
Originally Posted by NIREP reader
I’m stuck in the 70’s & 80’s so if I could pause time, all of them.
You fool... Not everything in the 70's was great......... flares, kipper ties and Jaguar..
NutLoose is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.