Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Old Lockheed "Starfighter" story

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Old Lockheed "Starfighter" story

Old 16th Oct 2020, 15:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: France
Age: 83
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Old Lockheed "Starfighter" story

In the 1970’s the Luftwaffe where operating the Lockheed 104G Starfighter.

Northern Germany was a low level training area sometimes as low as 250 feet !!

A British Army helicopter was flying south with the Chaplain to the Forces as pax.

Out of nowhere two Starfighters went under the helicopter from the right.

“jesus christ !!” shouted the pilot.

A voice from back seat “He heard you”

Last edited by rogerk; 16th Oct 2020 at 15:44. Reason: Bad spelling !
rogerk is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 15:58
  #2 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,589
Received 271 Likes on 150 Posts
I imagine there was a BoE to establish Hooter blame...
treadigraph is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 18:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
They wouldn't have gone underneath a Royal Air Force helicopter.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 20:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,338
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
They wouldn't have gone underneath a Royal Air Force helicopter.
Touche FED. Nice one!

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 20:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,589
Received 271 Likes on 150 Posts
A Buccaneer would...
treadigraph is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 20:21
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,348
Received 1,562 Likes on 710 Posts
250ft?

Jag pilots got nosebleeds that high.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 20:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 50 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
250ft?

Jag pilots got nosebleeds that high.....
Well the'd struggle to get higher without tanking...

PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 20:55
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: France
Age: 83
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As "Crabair" fly sidewise

Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
They wouldn't have gone underneath a Royal Air Force helicopter.
e

.... they would have aborted in utter amazement !!
rogerk is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 21:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 194
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
low level Vulcan

Back in the 1970's I was spraying vineyards with a Bell47 helicopter on the Moselle River near Trier.
Our landing spots were located higher up on the vineyard hills overlooking the river.
During refueling, a Vulcan passed below us along the river.
Amazing...What a sight & sound...Beautiful!
Good Vibs is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 21:37
  #10 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,572
Received 412 Likes on 217 Posts
The air control orders (ACOs) for RAF helicopters in (West) Germany back in those Cold War days usually stated not above 150 feet agl. That was the whole of the country. Fixed wing had to be not below 250 feet, to give a 100 foot separation. In published low flying areas, or areas designated as exercise areas, or areas which crews were deemed to have become familiarised with, we could transit at 50 feet agl. For certain parts of a flight there was no height limit, only a ten metre MSC, minimum (lateral) separation clearance. We regularly trained to fly under wires. Minimum clearances for that were 6 metres above, 3 metres laterally from a pylon, 2 metres below (to avoid the possibility of HT arcing through the airframe).

It was quite normal to get “bounced” by fast jets looking for training targets to play with. F-104s and F-4s were relatively easy to deal with, you could spot them miles away by their trail of black exhaust smoke and even if they saw you they were in the next county by the time they had turned round to get a bead on you. G-91s were more difficult to see, difficult to lose and flown by mad Belgians! Harrier pilots usually had to be told where we were....

Glad to have been part of it, but I wouldn’t want my kids doing it!
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2020, 23:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 61
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew to qualify for the ppl amongst that stuff.....
rifruffian is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 00:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,363
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
Doing powerline inspections in the Blue Mountains of NSW, my normal crew was a front-seat map-reader with all the poles numbered on his map, and a back-seat observer looking for faults, we were just above pole height. On this flight, the dumb fat powerline boss demanded to come along to see how it was done, but I parked him in the rear right of the B206 where he couldn't see much. After an hour or so, as we cruised along a ridge above the wires, DFB shouts, "F**k that was close!"
The rest of us, wondering what DFB was on about, asked "What was close?"
"That jet! It just missed us!"
Yeah, yeah, sure it did, us experts didn't see a thing.
Until the second F-18 scorched across the ridge in front of me.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 03:04
  #13 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 98 Likes on 69 Posts
I can safely say, that, gliding during the week in that era around Germany / Holland / Belgium could be a shade "invigorating " when looking down ( as well as up and around ) because not everybody was playing at low level.....
Krystal n chips is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 08:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 54
Posts: 108
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Later in life I was driving a Beford 4 tonner to Spadeadam. Driving along those narrow roads close to the base, this Tornado with reheat engaged came screaming overhead at what seems 2 foot above the truck. I didn’t see it coming as it was from behind. I instinctively ducked and nearly crashed the newly refurbished £49k leaving the road. Funny now but at the time............
NIREP reader is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 08:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
My RAFC Dick 'Whizzbang' was on a dual LL trip somewhere in LFA17 (as it was then), when his ex-RAFG QFI decided to demonstrate 'real low flying'.

A few minutes later Dick came up with the immortal words "Left, 10 o'clock, high - one Landrover, no threat!"
BEagle is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 08:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Once a Squirrel Heaven (or hell!), Shropshire UK
Posts: 836
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
FED and Treadigraph - I can attest to the Bucc going even lower. Just about 100ft, turning steeply round a hill, looked down to see Buccaneer passing underneath with the back seater looking up - and waving two fingers!
Shackman is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 09:27
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G 91s flown by Belgians? Not the ones we used to fight from Gutersloh, they were the only thing that could live with the Lightning in a turning bout at low level. The Buccs thought they could out turn us but really, get them to roll and pull at the same time and anything could happen aerodynamically, very amusing.
Firestreak is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 09:46
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,734
Received 76 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Firestreak
G 91s flown by Belgians? Not the ones we used to fight from Gutersloh, they were the only thing that could live with the Lightning in a turning bout at low level. The Buccs thought they could out turn us but really, get them to roll and pull at the same time and anything could happen aerodynamically, very amusing.
Yep, G-91 only ever operated by the GAF, IAF and the Portuguese AF.

Interesting you say that about the G-91 and the Lightning, as on a motoring forum the other day, I was mildly amused at an off topic aviation post where by one 'spotter' was trying to tell another that the Lightning had a poor rate of turn and couldn't turn below 300kts.......I don't think either was old enough to have ever seen the beast fly, let alone anything else, but it made me laugh.

GeeRam is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 10:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Reminds me of the comment, IIRC, from “Roger Bacon” the esteemed Flight International contributor. The F104 in GAF service had a pretty dire safety record, so his comment was.,. “ how do you start a scrap metal business? Buy a field in Germany and wait”
airspace alpha is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2020, 10:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Somewhere South
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes the Lightning turned very well. Mind you when flying low level intercepts and dogfighting, the fuel did not last very long!
PaulH1 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.