Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

B52 in 'emergency alert' over Gloucestershire

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

B52 in 'emergency alert' over Gloucestershire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2020, 08:47
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dead_pan
There wasn't that much drama TBH. When it became apparent they'd have to return to Fairford the original plan was burn fuel by orbiting over the North Sea, then the Brize area, then finally over Gloucester. The frame which had the hatch problem was I believe the same one which had a pressurization issue earlier in the day. The crew did discuss with bomber ops about whether to declare an emergency but presumably decided between them to wait until they were within weight limits before doing so.

I believe the local press got wind of the fact two Buffs were orbiting for nigh on two hours over Gloucs, found out about the hatch issue and put 2 and 2 together to get 11. The Daily Fail then got hold of the story...

What was more interesting was the comms between the two crews as they mused whether they should land, refuel and change cabs in order to get back stateside, as was their original plan. They clearly weren't that enamoured about having to return to Fairford.
Gloucestershire Live will pick up any non story these days, usually with clickbait titles like "You'll never believe why these American bombers were circling for hours" or some other tripe.
BirdmanBerry is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 09:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
'Any reports for someone finding a B52 crew entry hatch in their back garden?'

DH on GCHQ; at the start of the North bound leg of the orbits !
safetypee is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 09:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by sandiego89
That’s saying something if they would rather be at Minot rather than Fairford!
I guess even the bright lights of that throbbing metropolis that is Fairford must eventually lose its appeal over time.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 09:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Any reports for someone finding a B52 crew entry hatch in their back garden?
Currently on eBay, bid running at 50 quid (only joking!)

I'd buy it if is was. Nice little memento.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 10:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 191
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Wonder why the Minot-bound aircraft didn't just knock Poland on the head and head straight to Minot? Would they have needed tanking across the pond?
Stu666 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 10:50
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
[QUOTE]Wonder why the Minot-bound aircraft didn't just knock Poland on the head and head straight to Minot? Would they have needed tanking across the pond?[/QUOTE

Because the lack of tanker problem occurred after the planned Fairford - Poland and back part of the mission. And hence yes, they needed refueling before return to Minot as a result of the fuel burn during the Poland mission.
roger4 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 11:08
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 191
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
[QUOTE=roger4;10893527]
Wonder why the Minot-bound aircraft didn't just knock Poland on the head and head straight to Minot? Would they have needed tanking across the pond?[/QUOTE

Because the lack of tanker problem occurred after the planned Fairford - Poland and back part of the mission. And hence yes, they needed refueling before return to Minot as a result of the fuel burn during the Poland mission.
Thanks roger4, makes sense.
Stu666 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 14:53
  #28 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,175
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by airsound
. How often do you find one, and sometimes two, B52s in a roughly 13nm orbit, at 10,000ft-ish over rural Gloucestershire - for about 1 hour and 20 minutes? Don't you think it would be interesting to hear what they were doing - particularly perhaps for the people they were overflying?
its just practice run for doing the same sort of display over Beijing, just a slightly longer transit to the hold.
swh is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 18:15
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KORR somewhere
Posts: 378
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BirdmanBerry
Gloucestershire Live will pick up any non story these days, usually with clickbait titles like "You'll never believe why these American bombers were circling for hours" or some other tripe.
You said it... two of their Journo’s (a term used VERY loosely) cream their pants any time anything flies into Fairford, Kemble or an A400M flies overhead and they write numerous news articles (another term used VERY loosely) about it.

This is the paper that wrote a ‘news article’ because a plane carrying the Pope flew over the county......

plans123 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.