Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

B52 in 'emergency alert' over Gloucestershire

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

B52 in 'emergency alert' over Gloucestershire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Sep 2020, 10:37
  #1 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,017
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
B52 in 'emergency alert' over Gloucestershire

Gloucestershire Live reporting this
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.u...-alert-4551362

The report says "The US Air Force B-52 bomber transmitted a ‘squawk code 770" sic. Flightradar (below) says 7700. The report also talks about Minot air force base stating that there had been a 'general in flight emergency'. Flightradar earlier showed the orbits over Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury taking place at 10,000ft.


Flightradar24 coverage just after BAL0052 landed at Fairford

airsound
airsound is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 11:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Just happened to be watching this live on ADS-B yesterday, as a mate had sent a photo through of the 4 of them passing over him in Wellingborough....

It was the last of the 4 to land that squawked 7700....one of the pair to spend an hour or so orbiting Gloucester, the previous 3 to land had all also done a run and break to land as well at Fairford, but the last one landed straight in, but it didn't start squawking 7700 until after it ended the orbits of Gloucester and had started its decent.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 12:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trying to work out where the story is here - or is it just me?
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 13:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Kebab
Trying to work out where the story is here - or is it just me?
No, there isn’t one.
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 14:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were circling for more than an hour I'm sure, kept coming over our office, a pair together then one broke off and went low over our house as I got home just after 5.30pm.

Didn't I read they weren't squawking the emergency code and in fact the 'papers' got it wrong? GL is a cesspit of a local rag so wouldn't surprise me!

They have done these circuits in pairs before too a few weeks back. I just assumed they had too much fuel to land and therefore were burning it off?
BirdmanBerry is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 14:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The version on Fighter Control is that four of the six B-52 currently on deployment at Fairford went out on a mission over Poland yesterday. Two were due to return to Fairford, and the other two were scheduled to return to Minot direct from Poland. However their refueling tankers were out of crosswind limits (Mildenhall presumably) and couldn't launch, hence a late decision to return all four to Fairford. However the Minot-bound pair were overweight for landing and hence orbited Gloucester for an hour and a half burning off fuel. During this, one of the pair picked up a crew entry hatch warning light and declared an IFE and corresponding squawk of 7700. It landed safely and was met by the airfield rescue services.

Five of the six have departed today back to Minot, with yesterday's IFE aircraft the one left at Fairford for now.
roger4 is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 14:37
  #7 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,017
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
salad-dodger, Kris Kebab
Actually, I think there is a story. How often do you find one, and sometimes two, B52s in a roughly 13nm orbit, at 10,000ft-ish over rural Gloucestershire - for about 1 hour and 20 minutes? Don't you think it would be interesting to hear what they were doing - particularly perhaps for the people they were overflying?

As far as the 7700 squawk goes, BirdmanBerry, you're correct - they were only squawking that for not long before landing, according to flightradar24.

airsound
airsound is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 14:39
  #8 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,017
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
Crossed with roger4 - thank you very much for that. Sounds very plausible.

airsound
airsound is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 14:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airsound
salad-dodger, Kris Kebab
Don't you think it would be interesting to hear what they were doing - particularly perhaps for the people they were overflying?

airsound
no

(extra letters to submit)

salad-dodger is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 15:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 410
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Orbiting their Fail-Safe points......😉
57mm is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 17:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airsound
salad-dodger, Kris Kebab
Actually, I think there is a story. How often do you find one, and sometimes two, B52s in a roughly 13nm orbit, at 10,000ft-ish over rural Gloucestershire - for about 1 hour and 20 minutes? Don't you think it would be interesting to hear what they were doing - particularly perhaps for the people they were overflying?

As far as the 7700 squawk goes, BirdmanBerry, you're correct - they were only squawking that for not long before landing, according to flightradar24.

airsound
However this isn't the first time they've done this orbit. As I say a few weeks back they did the same, one then broke off to head to Fairford and the other circled a little longer and then went too, assuming to give the first one time to land.
BirdmanBerry is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 17:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Beds
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Perhaps they had engine trouble and had to land just using the remain seven . . .
Yarpy is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 18:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hoofddorp The Netherlands
Age: 70
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Yarpy
Perhaps they had engine trouble and had to land just using the remain seven . . .
Not the dreaded 7 engine approach,having to to do an asymmetric approach and landing.
spitfirek5054 is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 21:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spitfirek5054
Not the dreaded 7 engine approach,having to to do an asymmetric approach and landing.

7 engine approach used to be scary, then they remembered they can move the gear in line with the assymetry...
Meester proach is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 22:34
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
There wasn't that much drama TBH. When it became apparent they'd have to return to Fairford the original plan was burn fuel by orbiting over the North Sea, then the Brize area, then finally over Gloucester. The frame which had the hatch problem was I believe the same one which had a pressurization issue earlier in the day. The crew did discuss with bomber ops about whether to declare an emergency but presumably decided between them to wait until they were within weight limits before doing so.

I believe the local press got wind of the fact two Buffs were orbiting for nigh on two hours over Gloucs, found out about the hatch issue and put 2 and 2 together to get 11. The Daily Fail then got hold of the story...

What was more interesting was the comms between the two crews as they mused whether they should land, refuel and change cabs in order to get back stateside, as was their original plan. They clearly weren't that enamoured about having to return to Fairford.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 23:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,061
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by dead_pan
..... They clearly weren't that enamoured about having to return to Fairford.
That’s saying something if they would rather be at Minot rather than Fairford!
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 01:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 79
Posts: 542
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Why not Minot?
Barksdale Boy is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 06:06
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by salad-dodger
no

(extra letters to submit)

Hint. Need less than 10 characters? Type a series of whatever you want (dots for example) for the extra characters and colour them white. I'm not sure if they appear when being quoted though, so keep it clean.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 06:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Barksdale Boy
Why not Minot?
Freezins the reason
West Coast is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2020, 07:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roger4
<snip>
During this, one of the pair picked up a crew entry hatch warning light and declared an IFE and corresponding squawk of 7700. It landed safely and was met by the airfield rescue services.
</snip>
It's going to be quite interesting to see how well the B52s last. I know they're all pretty old already, and look to be carrying on indefinitely, but as they age then all sorts of things could crop up. There must be quite a lot of things on an aircraft that the original designers didn't necessarily determine a service life for because they were, so they thought, over engineered. But after 25, 50, 75 years of use, perhaps some of these things will start becoming a significant availability nuissance. I'm sure they've got a good grip on the aging of the airframe structure and everything to do with safe flight, but there's bound to be various items that could just wear out and hinder mission readiness.

Time will tell. Though these days efficiently dealing with problems like this is much easier than previously. The classic car world has been revolutionised by 3D laser scanners, 3D printing, CNC machining, etc, which has made parts reproduction very easy.

Any reports for someone finding a B52 crew entry hatch in their back garden?

(Apologies for the thread drift)
msbbarratt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.