Service numbers old or recent?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dark Side of West Wales
Age: 85
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In summer 1956 the basic number ranges were for regulars 418xxxx and national service 503xxxx. These were applied to all trades air and ground. Exceptions were Boy Entrants, Apprentices and Cranwell entrants having separate number ranges.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
In WW1 the army did not have a system of unique service numbers until some time in 1916. Prior to that they had regimental numbers which in fact started at 1 and were duplicated across the regimental system. Thus there could be a number 456 in the Suffolk Regiment and another in the Norfolk Regiment, and so on. The same applied to corps, although as these tended to be larger than line regiments their numbers often contained up to five digits. The unique service number came in to assist in admin when the army grew in size to several millions. The old gentleman at Catterick would have lost his original three digit number when the new system came in.
In the medal collecting world medals to individuals with low numbers are highly prized. I once had 1914-15 Star named to a number 10, an NCO in the Royal Warwicks, and a chum who specialises in this field has several "number 1s" in his collection. Although army and RAF officers have always had service numbers, these never appear on medals named to officers (check your own!)
In the medal collecting world medals to individuals with low numbers are highly prized. I once had 1914-15 Star named to a number 10, an NCO in the Royal Warwicks, and a chum who specialises in this field has several "number 1s" in his collection. Although army and RAF officers have always had service numbers, these never appear on medals named to officers (check your own!)
Unique army service numbers were not issued until 1920 +/- a year. Regimental number series had [from memory] seven iterations, the first c. 1836. The Great War Series began in 1881 for all regiments and corps but was generally subject to upper limits 9999 after which a new series should have begun. Many regiments were allowed past 10,000 by 1914, and there was not a new topping after that. Again, many regiments had:
a single series shared by both regular battalions,[or all four, in a few cases]
a separate series for each of their SR/Extra SR battalions
a separate series for each of their TF battalions.
Wartime Kitchener men were deemed to be regulars and used that series. It was quite possible for a slack handful of soldiers, wearing the same cap badge, to have the same number.
I co-wrote the definitive article [so far] on numbering, and the above is from memory. I can, if asked nicely, email copies to interested parties. There is also an internet site which benefits fully from modern connectivities and I can dig that out also.
Very interesting, L-B, I had always thought the unique service number came in during the war, but happy to be corrected. I am sending you a PM with my email address as I would appreciate a copy of the article you refer to. I have been in touch with my medal collecting chum and he tells me he has a fair sized collection of WW1 medals to recipients with 3 digit numbers, including Z-204 to the RFC and 800 to the RAF. He also has quite a few "number ones" including to the RA, RAMC, Rifle Brigade and The Queens,as well as several Indian Army units.
RAF Service numbers are fascinating, as Haraka pointed out there was an algorithm for deducing which letter was allocated as a prefix to the seven numbers.
Step one
Multiply the first number by 8
“ the second by 17
“ the third by 4
“ the fourth by 16
“ the fifth by 2
“ the sixth by 13
“ the seventh by 1
Add them to get ‘Answer A’.
Step two
Divide Answer A by 23 and reduce the number to the nearest integer to ger Answer B.
Step three
Take away Answer B from Answer A,
the result is then applied to the alphabet.
0 = A, 1 = B, 2 = C, 3 = D, etc until 23 = X.
There was a code in the first two digits which defined, Airman (Ground), Airman (Aircrew), Officer (Direct) and Officer (from the ranks). There may have been other codes, but if so, I’ve forgotten them.
My dad was a National Serviceman on entry 109 his number was 2349032 (1947 – 1949)
Mine was in the 8102*** group September 1972.
Step one
Multiply the first number by 8
“ the second by 17
“ the third by 4
“ the fourth by 16
“ the fifth by 2
“ the sixth by 13
“ the seventh by 1
Add them to get ‘Answer A’.
Step two
Divide Answer A by 23 and reduce the number to the nearest integer to ger Answer B.
Step three
Take away Answer B from Answer A,
the result is then applied to the alphabet.
0 = A, 1 = B, 2 = C, 3 = D, etc until 23 = X.
There was a code in the first two digits which defined, Airman (Ground), Airman (Aircrew), Officer (Direct) and Officer (from the ranks). There may have been other codes, but if so, I’ve forgotten them.
My dad was a National Serviceman on entry 109 his number was 2349032 (1947 – 1949)
Mine was in the 8102*** group September 1972.
My service number, issued in March 1971 was A8093***. When I was commissioned as a VR(T) officer in 1988 I was given the same number but the 'A' was moved from the front to the back.
RAF Service numbers are fascinating, as Haraka pointed out there was an algorithm for deducing which letter was allocated as a prefix to the seven numbers.
Step one
Multiply the first number by 8
“ the second by 17
“ the third by 4
“ the fourth by 16
“ the fifth by 2
“ the sixth by 13
“ the seventh by 1
Add them to get ‘Answer A’.
Step two
Divide Answer A by 23 and reduce the number to the nearest integer to ger Answer B.
Step three
Take away Answer B from Answer A,
the result is then applied to the alphabet.
0 = A, 1 = B, 2 = C, 3 = D, etc until 23 = X.
There was a code in the first two digits which defined, Airman (Ground), Airman (Aircrew), Officer (Direct) and Officer (from the ranks). There may have been other codes, but if so, I’ve forgotten them.
My dad was a National Serviceman on entry 109 his number was 2349032 (1947 – 1949)
Mine was in the 8102*** group September 1972.
Step one
Multiply the first number by 8
“ the second by 17
“ the third by 4
“ the fourth by 16
“ the fifth by 2
“ the sixth by 13
“ the seventh by 1
Add them to get ‘Answer A’.
Step two
Divide Answer A by 23 and reduce the number to the nearest integer to ger Answer B.
Step three
Take away Answer B from Answer A,
the result is then applied to the alphabet.
0 = A, 1 = B, 2 = C, 3 = D, etc until 23 = X.
There was a code in the first two digits which defined, Airman (Ground), Airman (Aircrew), Officer (Direct) and Officer (from the ranks). There may have been other codes, but if so, I’ve forgotten them.
My dad was a National Serviceman on entry 109 his number was 2349032 (1947 – 1949)
Mine was in the 8102*** group September 1972.
Applying it to my service number answer A is 190, Answer B is then 8. How do you get 6 (check character G) from that?
One other service number I know, my best mate in training, gives Answer A to be 261, Answer B as 11. We need a 5 for him as his number had F as a check character.
Or are my arithmetic skills letting me down?
When the check digit (letter) for officers was introduced, I was told it was all to do with computing time - the search starts with the letter, which means you are only looking at 1/26 of the records. If you then work backwards through the number, it then apparently only takes 3 or 4 turns of the handle to produce a result. At that point I lost interest!
L-B, I have sent you a PM requesting your article. One of my grandfathers and his brother both had four digit numbers beginning with 2 having joined up on the declaration of war in 1914.
TTN, My grandfather left me his brother's medal set Pip, Sqeak and Wilfred plus the DCM - unfortunately they went missing while on loan to familly member who died suddenly. I regularly visit my great uncle's grave in France, I greatly regretted not having the medals with me when I did so on the 100th anniversary of his death in action.
TTN, My grandfather left me his brother's medal set Pip, Sqeak and Wilfred plus the DCM - unfortunately they went missing while on loan to familly member who died suddenly. I regularly visit my great uncle's grave in France, I greatly regretted not having the medals with me when I did so on the 100th anniversary of his death in action.
When I joined in 1972 as an airman my Number like all others at the time started H8100, then when I was commissioned in 2002 the prefix letter moved to the end of the number. Before I retired in 2010 however the dreaded JPA had arrived and my number disappeared from the computer system. So when I joined the ATC as VR(T) in 2011 I was issued a completely different number with no letter, the strange thing was that if I substitute the 4 with the letter H and rearrange the other numbers I still have the same number.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middlesbrough U.K.
Age: 86
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Cornish Jack;10885391]Oddly perhaps, I remember my late brother's number as well as mine. He was ex-Air Training Corps so started 351 xxxx.
Are you sure it started 351? I was ex A.T.C and my R.A.F number started 315---- I was told this was for all ex A.T.C.
Are you sure it started 351? I was ex A.T.C and my R.A.F number started 315---- I was told this was for all ex A.T.C.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wilts
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My service number was preceded by a D and ended in 6. The lad before me had letter C and ended in 5 and the lad after me was E ending in 7. I can remember discussing it at Swinderby.
My late father was in the RAF from 1921 to 1927 in Egypt and Iraq (Mespot, as it was known), as an aircraft fitter on DH9As and Vickers Victorias. His number was 353xxx. I joined in 1956. Mine was 681xxx. That's progress for you.
Are you sure that the algorithm is correct?
Applying it to my service number answer A is 190, Answer B is then 8. How do you get 6 (check character G) from that?
One other service number I know, my best mate in training, gives Answer A to be 261, Answer B as 11. We need a 5 for him as his number had F as a check character.
Or are my arithmetic skills letting me down?
Applying it to my service number answer A is 190, Answer B is then 8. How do you get 6 (check character G) from that?
One other service number I know, my best mate in training, gives Answer A to be 261, Answer B as 11. We need a 5 for him as his number had F as a check character.
Or are my arithmetic skills letting me down?
Answer A was 144, then divide it by 23 = 6.26. Then multiply that integer (6) by 23 to get 138. Take that away from 'Answer A' to get 6 which = G.
"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
The joys of an earlier, simpler system. I joined in '64, starting at South Cerney. 423****. Left in '76, and re-enlisted in the VR(T) to fly AEF Chippies, in '84, retiring in '90. Retained the same number; none of this modern "check-letter" nonsense.
TTN, My grandfather left me his brother's medal set Pip, Sqeak and Wilfred plus the DCM - unfortunately they went missing while on loan to family member who died suddenly.
A few months ago I went in for surgery. The anaesthetist knew I was ex-service, and as I was going asked "last three". A bit of a surprise, but I told him, just before I went out. Not been asked that for well over thirty years
With that step the algorithm does indeed return the expected results.
Just back online. Don't ask.
Will send the promised article to supplicants in the next few days.
Will send the promised article to supplicants in the next few days.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Carlisle
Age: 70
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One more wrinkle to take into account. Previous postings stated "the result is then applied to the alphabet. 0 = A, 1 = B, 2 = C, 3 = D, etc until 23 = X." This is not quite true. I and O (India and Oscar) are omitted from the sequence to avoid confusion so H=7 and J = 8, then N=12 and P = 13, ending up with Z=23 (which is, of course, why 23 is the divisor).
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks olddog. I wonder if shackman is Ray C...? Excellent student and it seems Cathay management thought he was excellent as well!
Quite a few of these names I remember with some pleasure as they came to Leeming where I was a QFI.
Quite a few of these names I remember with some pleasure as they came to Leeming where I was a QFI.
Numbering article sent by email to those who requested and gave an email address!