Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

HMS Queen Elizabeth to exercise with a full deck

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

HMS Queen Elizabeth to exercise with a full deck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2020, 15:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 761
Received 530 Likes on 191 Posts
Originally Posted by JENKINS
My assessment earlier concerned the uniform and the stance of the 'sailors' photographed.
What on earth are you going on about?
Video Mixdown is online now  
Old 23rd Sep 2020, 15:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 522
Received 163 Likes on 87 Posts

Fourteen jets and a couple of helos on deck and you run out of space fairly quickly. There's a reason she's a biggun.....
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2020, 22:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Narfalk
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Shame it is not an air wing. Of British aircraft. When will we be getting what we wanted to order?
Cat Techie is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2020, 23:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cat Techie
Shame it is not an air wing. Of British aircraft. When will we be getting what we wanted to order?
Some time around Two thousand and never....
heights good is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 08:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Union Jack
So very unlike you to make such a graceless post, Nutty, quite apart from the fact that your comment is totally unconnected to the thread - I'm genuinely surprised at you and seriously suggest you reconsider its inclusion.

Jack
​​​​​​

Nutty's post is on topic and makes perfect sense, Jack. It's all about whether or not the Navy are playing with a full deck.
Minnie Burner is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 09:27
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,774
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
Those Yanks need to guard their aircraft while on a British carrier. I once spent an evening with an ex US Marine Phantom pilot who once landed on a British carrier because of a problem. As you can imagine he was well entertained in a fashion not possible on US ships and, the next morning, found that his aircraft had been suitably drafted into the Royal Navy.
pulse1 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 11:22
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Union Jack
So very unlike you to make such a graceless post, Nutty, quite apart from the fact that your comment is totally unconnected to the thread - I'm genuinely surprised at you and seriously suggest you reconsider its inclusion.

Jack
Originally Posted by Minnie Burner
​​​​​​Nutty's post is on topic and makes perfect sense, Jack. It's all about whether or not the Navy are playing with a full deck.
Oh, fair enough.

https://www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk/news/local-news/raf-officer-faces-court-martial-2967101?
FODPlod is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 15:05
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,754
Received 2,738 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Apologies Jack, just saw your post and agree, a bit of drift there...... so have removed it.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 15:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Apologies Jack, just saw your post and agree, a bit of drift there...... so have removed it.
and a bit of a wimpy reply. He didn’t pull you up for thread drift. He pulled you up for what looked like a pretty weak attempt at humour, describing it as graceless!
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 17:07
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: outernet
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pulse1
Those Yanks need to guard their aircraft while on a British carrier. I once spent an evening with an ex US Marine Phantom pilot who once landed on a British carrier because of a problem. As you can imagine he was well entertained in a fashion not possible on US ships and, the next morning, found that his aircraft had been suitably drafted into the Royal Navy.
You mean this one !


twothree is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 19:36
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,270
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
All is fair in love and cross decking,

I'm sure someone willl be along shortly with photos of USN altered FG1s. (please)
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 20:03
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Too close to the M6
Posts: 117
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
1976

I'm sure many will remember 1976 when the USN F4s had 1776 -1976 proudly emblazoned on their fins (vertical stabilisers - OK?)
892's F4s had 876-1976 on theirs. (about the time King Alf started the
Navy, no not 892, Brian)
This was not understood by the cousins.
gzornenplatz is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 01:11
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
All is fair in love and cross decking,

I'm sure someone willl be along shortly with photos of USN altered FG1s. (please)

Ot the Tornado (I think) that left a sleepy desert USAF base in Nevada with some new art on it.
West Coast is online now  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 04:20
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
All is fair in love and cross decking,

I'm sure someone willl be along shortly with photos of USN altered FG1s. (please)
Here you are




John Eacott is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 04:40
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,379
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by twothree
You mean this one !

One of a series of photos I took, so here's the dit

We were operating in the Med and cross-decked with USS Forrestal, but like all good things it came to an end and we brought our toys home to Mother and tried sending theirs back. Unfortunately 207 repeatedly went U/S and things became dire as we were due into Grand Harbour where Dom Mintoff, Malta's PM, had declared all things military associated with the USA to be unwelcome. A last attempt to launch 207 failed so it was rapidly dispatched to the lower hangar before we entered harbour.

All was well, and the US Marine crew thoroughly enjoyed the benefits of being on a warship which allowed grown men to consume alcohol. After the usual Cocker's P, visits from local dignitaries, etc, it was deemed safe to bring 207 up from the Buccaneer hangar into the upper hangar where the 892NAS team could work on the snags. Somewhere along the way the odd 892 sticker zaps became a better idea of a complete repaint on the fin.

This became quite handy when ground runs were required, as all USMC markings were covered with brown paper and the tail seemed quite enough to allow runs on deck, noise to Valletta residents notwithstanding.

Came time to leave harbour and the first call was to Flying Stations, launch the VMFA-531 F4 regardless of servicability. Off it went back to Forrestal where Cdr Bill Quirk, CO of 531, was so taken with the zap that he kept it all the way home and launched to lead his squadron with one of the best zaps of its time

A few more images, including one when I went over to Forrestal to pick up our maintenance guys and return (some) of theirs!

















John Eacott is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 07:39
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,576
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Great story + pics John!
dead_pan is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 08:50
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and then there were 15 (plus 8 helos).


FODPlod is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 11:13
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
A CAG of 14 jets plus some helos is not much compared to 60+ cabs on USN or even the old RN. Why are they saying its a big fleet then?
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 11:45
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 761
Received 530 Likes on 191 Posts
Originally Posted by TBM-Legend
A CAG of 14 jets plus some helos is not much compared to 60+ cabs on USN or even the old RN. Why are they saying its a big fleet then?
That's not what they're saying at all. They're saying "HMSQNLZ embarked the largest air group of 5th generation fighters yet put to sea anywhere in the world." Are you suggesting it's not true?
Video Mixdown is online now  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 13:13
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by John Eacott
One of a series of photos I took, so here's the dit

We were operating in the Med and cross-decked with USS Forrestal, but like all good things it came to an end and we brought our toys home to Mother and tried sending theirs back. Unfortunately 207 repeatedly went U/S and things became dire as we were due into Grand Harbour where Dom Mintoff, Malta's PM, had declared all things military associated with the USA to be unwelcome. A last attempt to launch 207 failed so it was rapidly dispatched to the lower hangar before we entered harbour.

All was well, and the US Marine crew thoroughly enjoyed the benefits of being on a warship which allowed grown men to consume alcohol. After the usual Cocker's P, visits from local dignitaries, etc, it was deemed safe to bring 207 up from the Buccaneer hangar into the upper hangar where the 892NAS team could work on the snags. Somewhere along the way the odd 892 sticker zaps became a better idea of a complete repaint on the fin.

This became quite handy when ground runs were required, as all USMC markings were covered with brown paper and the tail seemed quite enough to allow runs on deck, noise to Valletta residents notwithstanding.

Came time to leave harbour and the first call was to Flying Stations, launch the VMFA-531 F4 regardless of servicability. Off it went back to Forrestal where Cdr Bill Quirk, CO of 531, was so taken with the zap that he kept it all the way home and launched to lead his squadron with one of the best zaps of its time

A few more images, including one when I went over to Forrestal to pick up our maintenance guys and return (some) of theirs!

















There were hangars on two decks ?
stilton is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.