Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Soldiers, Sailors and ...?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Soldiers, Sailors and ...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
For inclusivity, what about, 'airthey'? Does it not cover all 64 genders?

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 79
Posts: 542
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
I always thought civilians aviated and we flew.
Barksdale Boy is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:24
  #23 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
Can’t use aviators because there are aviators and aviatrix....
ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:30
  #24 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
You could just refer to crew - as in aircrew, ground crew, supernumerary crew etc.

It has a suitable naval ring - “the officers and crew prepared for battle”.
ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
Soldiers, Sailors and Air People. Leading Air Person, Senior Air Person etc ?.
Timelord is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:39
  #26 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,141
Received 223 Likes on 65 Posts
NCOs obviously being Archangels.
And the SWO?
Herod is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:41
  #27 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
The RAF obviously is remiss and has to adjust to modern culture and catch up with the times and vernacular.....

ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 14:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
My mother married an RAF Pilot, and from that day on my maternal grandfather invariably referred to the British air force as "that rabble".

I offer this as the very obvious collective noun that the OP is looking for.
old,not bold is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 15:14
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Country
Posts: 17
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
What about "soldiers, sailors and woke"
Wyntor is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 15:25
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Here 'n' there!
Posts: 589
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
....... Surprised our fishy friends haven't suggested 'Crabs'....
That, dear BEags, is coz we Navy types have been using that phrase routinely (and most effectively) to refer to anyone in the RAF for, well, probably since the RAF was dreamed up out of the RNAS, so there is really no need for any further discussion.

On that basis, we rather fail to see the point of this Thread.......... Toodle pip! H 'n' H
Hot 'n' High is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 15:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,837
Received 2,805 Likes on 1,195 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
You could just refer to crew - as in aircrew, ground crew, supernumerary crew etc.

It has a suitable naval ring - “the officers and crew prepared for battle”.
It has a suitable RAF ring -"The crew prepared to send the the officers to battle. "

NutLoose is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 15:46
  #32 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
And the SWO?
No change, obviously - GCMG...
ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 15:47
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,837
Received 2,805 Likes on 1,195 Posts
Soldiers, Sailors and Guardians of the Atmosphere has a nice ring to it... we can move onto the Galaxy in a few light years...
NutLoose is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 15:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,275
Received 130 Likes on 84 Posts
Ah, the joys of Anglo-Saxon exceptionalism - in other parts of the world feminists campaign for feminine titles to avoid being obscured by the masculine ones. In France there was a drawn out debate was whether female doctors should be la docteure or la doctoresse earlier it was common to use la docteur. Being a grumpy, older, ex-dark blue, white male I should probably exclude myself from this debate.

However: not wanting to disappoint BEagle and very much in jest...

Army - Solidier derives ultimately from the latin solidus (aka shilling) referring to their pay
Navy - Sailor derives from sailer i.e. someone or thing that sails
So,
Airforce - my ideas are Geographer - someone who uses maps to their own service's advantage, Boaster - someone who celebrates their own achievements, PPensioner - someone who uses PPrune to discuss pension schemes and PVR... other suggestions welcome.



SLXOwft is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 16:05
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Soldiers, Sailors and Airforce. It describes exactly whats on the tin..
Ding! Ding! Nutty wins...
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 16:11
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pba_target
I can assure that as far as a significant number of females are concerned, "man" is very gender specific and they do not wish to be described as such.
If man as a suffix to crafts or midship is non-PC, then surely male as a suffix to fe is equally inappropriate? Perhaps even worse?
Cyberhacker is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 16:18
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,788
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Is it really too much of a mouthful to say “airmen and airwomen”? It’s only two syllables longer than the awful ‘aviators’.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 16:55
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,837
Received 2,805 Likes on 1,195 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Line Entry
So a lot of discussion ongoing about finding a collective noun to equate to soldiers and sailors. I agree that ‘officers, airmen and airwomen’ is somewhat clunky but what to use instead?

‘Aviator’ seems the favourite at the moment, but before you all start quoting dictionaries, you do have to then accept an interpretation of the word that is:

a. Gender neutral by discounting the word aviatrix (in the same way the term actor now applies to women rather than actress).

b. Applicable to all those involved in the business of aviation (ie in the RAF), rather than just those who actually fly.

Or is there a better term?


The second issue revolves about the rank of Aircraftman (and LAC and SAC) which officially applies to women too - I believe their rank is not, bizarrely Aircraftwoman. It’s the only rank we have that is gendered, so how about changing that too, in the same way that the RN moved away from Able Seaman to Able Rate. One proposal is to change the term to ‘Specialist’ (or for the techies, ‘Technician’)

Now this is Pprune, so I fully expect the usual suspects to tell me that this is Political Correctness gone mad and how in the 80’s even the women were real men, but FWIW, my view is that it is both an easy thing to change and something that we ought to do. The test to me is that, as a bloke, would you want your rank to be ‘Aircraftwoman’?
My question is are they actually looking at this? With shrinking budgets, And the country with Covid in debt up to the eyeballs. If there is a serious attempt to rename our service personnel you would be a fool to imagine it does not come without a cost. The simple and unfashionable reasoning behind changing Junior Tech to SAC Tech required new rank tabs producing, all the rank posters redoing, all paperwork relating to ranks replacing and the list goes on, Pensions, pay etc, one would like to know how much that exercise cost and for what benefit? The current system has been in place for decades, why change it now?
NutLoose is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 17:28
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 282
Received 30 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Hot 'n' High
probably since the RAF was dreamed up out of the RNAS, so there is really no need for any further discussion.
Of course, prior to 1914 the RNAS was the Naval Wing of the RFC.
ExAscoteer2 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2020, 17:36
  #40 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,141
Received 223 Likes on 65 Posts
No change, obviously - GCMG...
OK ORAC; can't argue with that.
Herod is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.