Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lt(jg) Maddy Swegle USN

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Lt(jg) Maddy Swegle USN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Aug 2020, 01:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAUDI
Posts: 462
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Back off, sport. Now. Stand the f*** down.

You are crapping on someone who did that hard thing: try to drink through a fire hose. I am painfully familiar with the accountant/bean counter initiative to reduce the T-45 syllabus "length" by "ten percent" due to it being "so costly" to train fast jet pilots.

Her predecessors in Fast Jet Land got to fly T-2 and A-4 (CQing in both) before the bean counting scum tried to make it all more "cost effective" - and the original T-45 syllabus did that due to good use of better sims and syllabus design that applied about 60 years of lessons learned in pilot training.

And then the accountants got involved. They took what "was" in the expensively designed T-45 syllabus and claimed that a 10% (actually, more than 10%) reduction in syllabus length was somehow justified. (morons, and not a one an aviator). Not on aviation grounds, but on fiscal grounds.

You gotta a lotta damn nerve to throw any shade on her or any of her contemporaries.
F*** off.
And stay f**'ed.
I bow to your well-presented, logical, and factual argument. And I understand your frothing at the mouth due to bean counters destabilizing an established and well proven training environment. Just confirm you do live in the land of free speech? Or is it the one where if you don’t agree with me or say something I find disagreeable I’ll blow you away?

Read it again Fred. “Someone” is the giveaway. I did not say Lt(jg) Maddy Swegle USN is only there because she is female.

No specific shade on her but certainly on contemporaries. In our world where due to lack of representation of the population based on gender, race and religion, standards have changed to allow more percentage based representation. I did not specify that this person got where she was without ability. I did state that this is the case in a lot of areas and that this dilutes her achievements when people continually see people given/placed in position not based on their ability but based on positive discrimination. Indefensible? Really what world do you live in if you do not believe that positive discrimination is at work. I have no problem with the situation where there are applicants that are similar in qual’s with the position being given based on this. I do have a gripe with positions being given to people, based on positive discrimination, when there are significantly better applicants that are passed over to meet the Politicians demands. The end result of this is we have people failing, which is good for no-one, not the company (read military) nor the individual. Or people being passed based on rearranged standards. If you do not think this happens, well being blind to reality is to be pitied.
finestkind is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2020, 02:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAUDI
Posts: 462
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Pistons Forever
Hard to say there is positive discrimination if it took over 30 years for the Navy to have ONE black female fast air pilot. As for Lt Hultgreen, why is she vilified when there have been plenty of male pilots with major Fu*kups who got a pass ?
This is the reason for positive discrimination. To open the door for those minorities that have not even considered this career pathway (or in the case of King Hussein to get his people into the mind set of earning via working). But you either ante up and take the hurt by diluting the standards to get people in these careers. Thereby attracting more to walk through the door and acknowledge the considerable risk associated with this from having weaker links in the chain too never being able to re-establish the standard to what it once was. Or stay with the current system.



As for Lt Hultgreen, vilification is totally unjustified. This is where professionalism is supposed to come in by identifying the chain of events that contributed or lead to the accident.

Last edited by finestkind; 4th Aug 2020 at 03:45.
finestkind is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2020, 02:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Petal just wondering why you can't have a reasoned argument without plumbing the dephs and displaying a side of your character you can't control.
E86
eagle 86 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2020, 03:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A time line not checked for accuracy -

Wesley Anthony Brown
(April 3, 1927 – May 22, 2012) was the first African-American graduate of the United States Naval Academy (USNA) in Annapolis, Maryland. He served in the United States Navy from May 2, 1944, until June 30, 1969. He was involved in both the Korean and Vietnam wars.

1944 - The commissioning of the Navy’s first two African-American female officers. WAVES—Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service, or, essentially, the women’s reserve branch of the Navy—selected the two most capable African-American recruits: Harriet Ida Pickens and Frances Eliza Wills, two highly accomplished women of New York City

Jesse LeRoy Brown (October 13, 1926December 4, 1950) was a United States Navy officer. He was the first African-American aviator to complete the U.S. Navy's basic flight training program, was a recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross, and the first African-American naval officer killed in the Korean War.


In Annapolis, Maryland, the United States Naval Academy admits women for the first time in its history with the induction of 81 female midshipmen. In May 1980, Elizabeth Anne Rowe became the first woman member of the class to graduate.

Barbara Ann Allen Rainey (August 20, 1948 – July 13, 1982) was one of the first six female pilots in the U.S. armed forces. Rainey received her wings of gold as the first female to be designated a naval aviator in February 1974 and became the first Navy woman to qualify as a jet pilot. She attained the rank of Lieutenant Commander in the United States Navy

1980 - Brenda E. Robinson, the first Black female naval aviator, who earned her Wings of Gold in 1980.

Kara Spears Hultgreen (5 October 1965 – 25 October 1994) was a lieutenant and naval aviator in the United States Navy and the first female carrier-based fighter pilot in the U.S. Navy.


2020 - Lt. j.g. Madeline "Maddy" Swegle - The U.S. Navy's first Black female Tactical Aircraft pilot will receive her "Wings of Gold" during a ceremony in Kingsville, Texas..

Last edited by Islandlad; 4th Aug 2020 at 03:18.
Islandlad is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2020, 12:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Originally Posted by finestkind
I do have a gripe with positions being given to people, based on positive discrimination, when there are significantly better applicants that are passed over to meet the Politicians demands.
Fascinating that you feel secure to make the assumption of not being qualified in her case, and that someone better was, or must have been, overlooked.
But you have no basis for it.
I am all too familiar with the press for affirmative action in flight training and the demands put on the instructors and the training system to support that directive. You still attrite those who can't fly well enough. (Well, we did).
Originally Posted by eagle 86
Petal
Make sure you lube up that cyclic thoroughly before you take a seat on it. It will save your 'rhoids from undue agitation.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2020, 12:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Originally Posted by Islandlad
A time line not checked for accuracy -

In Annapolis, Maryland, the United States Naval Academy admits women for the first time in its history with the induction of 81 female midshipmen. In May 1980, Elizabeth Anne Rowe became the first woman member of the class to graduate.
Your time line is mostly on course and speed.
81 females were sworn in on July 6, 1976. 55 Graduated on 28 May, 1980. Five got the opportunity to head to Pensacola to start flight training. (Along with about 200 of their male classmates).
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2020, 23:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAUDI
Posts: 462
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Fascinating that you feel secure to make the assumption of not being qualified in her case, and that someone better was, or must have been, overlooked.
But you have no basis for it.
I am all too familiar with the press for affirmative action in flight training and the demands put on the instructors and the training system to support that directive. You still attrite those who can't fly well enough. (Well, we did).
Make sure you lube up that cyclic thoroughly before you take a seat on it. It will save your 'rhoids from undue agitation.
How many times does it have to be stated that the post was NOT specifically about this Lt. Can you expand on your " You still attrite those who can't fly well enough".

I do hope you were not in the military as anyone with your emotive and personal style attacks (does not play the ball but the man) would have been hell to have as a superior.

finestkind is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 03:34
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by finestkind
I do hope you were not in the military as anyone with your emotive and personal style attacks (does not play the ball but the man) would have been hell to have as a superior.
Lonewolf has used some interesting language in the last few days but I would say that the above attributes are EXACTLY what is required of a military man and woman there is nothing superior to a fighter pilot - particularly one who does it onto a boat

My little list of firsts has a shocking attrition rate! I wish this young lady well: safe landings and a fantastic career.
Islandlad is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 06:51
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAUDI
Posts: 462
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Islandlad
Lonewolf has used some interesting language in the last few days but I would say that the above attributes are EXACTLY what is required of a military man and woman there is nothing superior to a fighter pilot - particularly one who does it onto a boat

My little list of firsts has a shocking attrition rate! I wish this young lady well: safe landings and a fantastic career.
I hope I have not misconstrued you comments Islandlad, but are you saying that you want an emotive CO for a fast jet SQN that personally attacks his subordinates if they don't see eye to eye?
finestkind is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 16:21
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Originally Posted by finestkind
How many times does it have to be stated that the post was NOT specifically about this Lt.
If you say so. I wonder if we don't agree on a few more things than we don't.
Can you expand on your " You still attrite those who can't fly well enough".
The term attrite refers to disenrolling people from flight training who can't meet standards. Well, it used to anyway.
"Skipper, last quarter we had three attrites and six DORs. {Drop on Request; flight students haning up the cleats voluntarily} Their packages were reviewed by the Wing and CNATRA, except for one DOR. She's undergoing a psych eval with Medical; the other eight are pending orders from the Bureau."
(That is roughly how I briefed our CO one fine Monday afternoon, obviously not verbatim as it's been over 30 years ... ).
Maybe they use a new term now.
As to launching attacks: my best CO's were the ones who went after anyone who tried to go after the people in their squadron.
I retired from active duty 15 years ago.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 18:20
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: cowtown
Posts: 898
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
I wonder when the Olympics will abolish male and female events ? Just the fastest , highest and strongest need apply
fitliker is online now  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 18:40
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,399
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Although Air Force specific, a very good read on the subject at hand:
https://www.airspacemag.com/airspace...ght-180975332/

One question was directed at Leavitt in particular. A reporter asked if by going into fighter training so soon, she was “leapfrogging” over qualified men. When she tried to explain that she was following the same process as everyone else, the reporter asked McPeak to step in and clarify. “Jeannie graduated number one in her class,” he said. “She’s been in a holding pattern for six months. She’s not leapfrogging anyone. She’s been delayed.”
This thread is a shining example of the problem I have with so called "Affirmative Action" - it cheapens the accomplishments of those that get the job based on merit - not because of their gender or color of their skin - and reinforces the discriminatory belief that that they are inferior.
tdracer is online now  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 19:16
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
I would imagine Lt. Swegle is rightfully proud of her accomplishment. I truly hope she doesn’t stumble upon pprune and some of the posts here that attribute her success to her gender and skin color.
West Coast is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2020, 23:52
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,338
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
I truly hope she doesn’t stumble upon pprune and some of the posts here that attribute her success to her gender and skin color.
Or her parents/family, who really don't need the shine taken off their immense pride in a child who has done something that only very few can.

CG
charliegolf is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2020, 06:21
  #35 (permalink)  
MG
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 593
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Although Air Force specific, a very good read on the subject at hand:
https://www.airspacemag.com/airspace...ght-180975332/
An interesting article but, wow, what an unhappy looking bunch of aviators in that last photo. I’m guessing that they really didn’t want to be there. If that’s going to be use for recruitment, as it suggests, it’s no going to do the Air Force any favours.
MG is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2020, 08:38
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
An interesting article but, wow, what an unhappy looking bunch of aviators in that last photo.
Standing around on a damp, dreary flight line whilst a snapper fiddles with his f-stops would probably tax the patience of a saint!

I would imagine Lt. Swegle is rightfully proud of her accomplishment. I truly hope she doesn’t stumble upon PPRuNe and some of the posts here that attribute her success to her gender and skin color.
Absolutely, Westie!
BEagle is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2020, 09:11
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,338
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
An interesting article but, wow, what an unhappy looking bunch of aviators in that last photo.
Staged rufftie-tufftie pic.

CG
charliegolf is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2020, 12:53
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SAUDI
Posts: 462
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
If you say so. I wonder if we don't agree on a few more things than we don't.
The term attrite refers to disenrolling people from flight training who can't meet standards. Well, it used to anyway.
(That is roughly how I briefed our CO one fine Monday afternoon, obviously not verbatim as it's been over 30 years ... ).
Maybe they use a new term now.
As to launching attacks: my best CO's were the ones who went after anyone who tried to go after the people in their squadron.
I retired from active duty 15 years ago.
Really. What a nonsensical thing to say or just what are you saying. That I cannot state that my post is not about whatever and you are going to say yes it is????

Disenrolling not even certain that’s a word. We suspend students from course.

If your CO is protecting his people than that’s what a good CO does. My point which you seem to miss on other numerous occasion’s is if you have superior that target people because they don’t like the way they “part their hair” are unprofessional and would be very unpleasant to work for.

I am pleased you where a member of the military. I retired from active service 24 months ago.


finestkind is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2020, 14:42
  #39 (permalink)  
MG
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 593
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Standing around on a damp, dreary flight line whilst a snapper fiddles with his f-stops would probably tax the patience of a saint!
A bit of a daft statement. Any decent photog can get a bit of a smile and then chose the best to publish.
MG is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2020, 15:31
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Originally Posted by finestkind
Really. What a nonsensical thing to say or just what are you saying. That I cannot state that my post is not about whatever and you are going to say yes it is?
How about you focus on this bit - we may agree about more than we don't - and we can leave it at that.
Disenrolling not even certain that’s a word.
It became one when the personnel types wanted a less harsh sounding word than attrite. I did a double-take the first time the Student Control officer used the term in a meeting, and I recall seeing it in various training administrative regulations but that goes back abou a couple of decades.
You can call it a version of US Navy 'Newspeak'.
Aside: There is this never ending fiddling with jargon that can be a pain. We used to have the Replacement Air Group (RAG) for taking newly winged aviators and training them on the fleet type: F-14, CH-46, P-3, etc. We referred to it as "the rag" in conversation. Well, that apparently offended some of our more precious higher ups/congress critters as more ladies joined our ranks during the 80's. The Navy had to change the name. The units were reclassified as "Fleet Replacement Squadron" (FRS). As far as I can tell, that's still the proper term.
I am sure someone got a medal or a letter of commendation for coming up with that brilliant piece of word smithing.
We may have had it inflicted upon us - disenroll for remove from training - during the nascent USAF/USN JPATS development period. USAF uses a lot of strange terms, or so it seemed to me from a Naval perspective.
I am pleased you were a member of the military. I retired from active service 24 months ago.
As above, I suspect we may agree on more than we don't.

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 6th Aug 2020 at 15:42.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.