Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fire - USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 - 12 Jul 20

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fire - USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 - 12 Jul 20

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jul 2020, 10:14
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Forgive my ignorance but there will be no ammunition on board when works are done pierside?
Less Hair is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 10:22
  #22 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Presume that all ammo etc will have been removed before the maint. work started but fighting a fire on top of 1M gallons of fuel? - braver people than me, thats for sure; please take care. I wonder if they have started to evacuate the docks area, if that lot goes off it will be one hell of a bang.
 
Old 13th Jul 2020, 10:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Uka Duka
Posts: 1,003
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Forgive my ignorance but there will be no ammunition on board when works are done pierside?
It was in dock for a pre-planned 24 month maintenance cycle so hopefully nothing serious aboard apart from some small arms ammo.

Certainly nothing that would go up better than the 1,000,000 gallons of fuel down below. . .




Last edited by Auxtank; 13th Jul 2020 at 10:52.
Auxtank is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 10:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bradfield CO11 2XD
Age: 81
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GeeRam
If she's listing, pressumably its the water from being poured on to her, and not being able to be pumped out............isn't that what caused the SS Normandie to turn over in New York after catching fire during WW2 while being refitted as a troopship.
Also the Empress of Canada in Liverpool in the 1950s and a Danish ferry the Kronprins Frederik at Parkeston Quay (Harwich) also in the 1950s.

Last edited by KING6024; 13th Jul 2020 at 10:59.
KING6024 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 10:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
How about towing her to some remote safe place and let her burn out there? Right now we have a major fire inside some huge military port with many ships next to her.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 10:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,214 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
How about towing her to some remote safe place and let her burn out there? Right now we have a major fire inside some huge military port with many ships next to her.

Why not simply scuttle her where she is, recovery of everything will be a damned sight easier?
NutLoose is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 11:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 768
Received 549 Likes on 199 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Why not simply scuttle her where she is, recovery of everything will be a damned sight easier?
Who in their right mind would go aboard to do that? Same with towing.
Video Mixdown is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 11:30
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 494
Received 41 Likes on 14 Posts
Why would they leave 1,000,000 gallons of fuel on board during a 24 month refit? Doesn't it go off like petrol?
WB627 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 12:00
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown
Who in their right mind would go aboard to do that? Same with towing.

If it’s shallow enough it might prevent a capsize
stilton is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 12:00
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WB627
Why would they leave 1,000,000 gallons of fuel on board during a 24 month refit? Doesn't it go off like petrol?
Nowhere to store it? Is there an issue that you can't just stick it back into a general storage tank without potentially contaminating that fuel somehow? Does seem odd, I agree.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 12:29
  #31 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
https://www.forbes.com/sites/craigho...ety-practices/

USS Bonhomme Richard Burns, Likely A Victim Of Lax Fire Safety Practices
ORAC is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 12:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
The boiler is said to have exploded due to over pressure for some reason. Not sure what that necessarily has to do with fire safety practices? Maybe better wait for the report?
Less Hair is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 13:13
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,214 Posts
Originally Posted by WB627
Why would they leave 1,000,000 gallons of fuel on board during a 24 month refit? Doesn't it go off like petrol?
Possibly to ballast the ship?. after all if it wasn't a reason like that you would expct them to run down the fuel prior to refit.

If it’s shallow enough it might prevent a capsize
That's what I thought as they said it had a list on. At least if its sitting on the bottom it is stable as you rectify the problem, it could also be possible to refloat it in the future
NutLoose is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 13:18
  #34 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
The boiler is said to have exploded due to over pressure for some reason. Not sure what that necessarily has to do with fire safety practices? Maybe better wait for the report?
The main thrust of the article is the litany of previous dockyard fires and mishaps which have preceded this one. To quote:

”....America’s Navy has seen these scenarios play out far too many times. In 2012, America lost the multibillion-dollar attack submarine USS Miami (SSN 755) because a shipyard worker, eager to leave work early, set the sub on fire. Last year, 11 U.S. sailors were injured in a fire aboard the USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7), a critical Marine-toting mini-carrier. USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79) also suffered a fire in November 2018, and subsequent damage will keep the ship out of the fleet for almost two years longer than planned. According to USNI News, the USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62) suffered a shipyard fire as well. In 2011, a fire torched the stacks of the USS Spruance (DDG 111). Other recent shipyard mishaps have included over $30 million worth of damage to the future destroyer Delbert D. Black (DDG 119) after a collision in April 2019. These, along with other avoidable incidents—fires at sea, groundings, collisions and other accidents—have essentially sunk or sidelined an entire U.S. battle fleet.....”
ORAC is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 13:20
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,214 Posts
That looks like its toast..






https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/american-assault-ship-uss-bonhomme-richard-on-fire/ and the Telegraph
NutLoose is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 13:28
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,214 Posts
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...into-the-night
NutLoose is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 13:50
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FlightlessParrot
One answer seems to be the report that there were only about 160 crew on board: https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-...ort-san-diego/

You'd also assume, in any case, that damage control parties, and especially those in command of them, would have different priorities and risk-assessments alongside, compared to at sea in combat.

Fair argument which I also considered.

But the DOD doesn't like losing assets for any reason and will find somebody didn't do their job. Whether it is easy to correct or not, remains to be seen

I'm really not interested in the accidental cause as much as I am in the reasons for the spread (ala the Midway Jap disaster)
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 14:09
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,843 Likes on 1,214 Posts


From roughly when the fire started, go to 3.40 ish the radio conversations says there are munitions on board but not in the fire area but one floor above and some / good distance aft?. Appears to spread awful quick considering its a warship.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 14:10
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Uka Duka
Posts: 1,003
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
The good old Press;

KUSI TV (San Diego TV station) reporting; "Apparently, there are hover-jets on board that can land down horizontally..."
Auxtank is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2020, 14:56
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,012
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Here is an aerial photograph taken sometime yesterday:




Sad to see such a proud vessel in peril.

- Ed
cavuman1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.