Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

AMI Leonardo HH-101 CEASAR successful AAR

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

AMI Leonardo HH-101 CEASAR successful AAR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2020, 10:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
AMI Leonardo HH-101 CEASAR successful AAR

rifornimento tanker record sei ore in volo per HH101





chopper2004 is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2020, 11:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A bit high in that last shot. Lucky they didn't take the probe tip off.

They would have done if they were doing 250 knots.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2020, 11:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
A bit high in that last shot. Lucky they didn't take the probe tip off.

They would have done if they were doing 250 knots.
What point are you trying to make? How could you take probe tip off?
A 101 can't do 250kts...
Surely for RW AAR if you're a bit high then less chance of taking drogue off with rotors...
switch_on_lofty is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2020, 13:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 523
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
The tip of the probe on a Merlin is actually angled down, so with the 'pole' angled up in this image the tip itself is actually level.
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2020, 12:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Too high or too low could lead to excessive bending moment on the probe, even if the tip is in the correct orientation.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 29th Feb 2020, 21:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,833
Received 72 Likes on 28 Posts
How could you take probe tip off?
Admittedly, a longer probe, but...

MightyGem is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2020, 15:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perfectly normal

pic 1 is in pre contact
Pic 2 is at contact
Pic 3 is in refuelling position, in line with wing tip dump pipe ( normal for RW AAR behind a KC130 )
​​​​​
nice to see it being done in service though

DM

Last edited by dangermouse; 1st Mar 2020 at 15:19. Reason: Predictive text issues!
dangermouse is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2020, 16:31
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
I have done AAR courtesy of the 551st but I wouldn't consider myself an expert by any means. However, sitting a bit high would help keep the helicopter rotors out of the C-130's downwash, which can be quite intense, especially if refuelling from the starboard side. As per the CH-53 video, turbulence leading to PIO can be very dangerous. The Americans lost another CH-53 some years ago, in a similar accident when the main rotors contacted the hose.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2020, 21:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
It's surprising that the RAF didn't convert a few short J models into special ops aircraft including tanking given the Chinook and Merlins that could have had AAR...
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 08:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£££££££££££

see above

DM
dangermouse is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 11:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by TBM-Legend
It's surprising that the RAF didn't convert a few short J models into special ops aircraft including tanking given the Chinook and Merlins that could have had AAR...
The Merlins have always had an AAR capability, and the first HC4 roll-out had the probe refitted. the problem comes from the Airtanker agreement and who can AAR UK military aircraft.

https://www.flightglobal.com/helicop...128245.article
Davef68 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 18:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 509
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Air Tanker only have exclusivity if they can provide the facility. Can the Merlin tank at 260 KIAS ? (Hose limit on pod) or 180 (FRU limit).

The RJ manages AAR without Air Tanker .
vascodegama is online now  
Old 3rd Mar 2020, 07:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no low speed drogues on a UK tanker

and none planned is the issue. Refuel speed must be somewhere in the 120-130kts range as thats the drogue limit. Technically UK Merlin is cleared for AAR but without a Kc130 fleet or pods on the Atlas there is no hope of CHF getting to use the facility, let alone retain currency. Shame but unless we can obtain enough access to foreign tankers (very unlikely imho) it just ain't gonna happen
DM
dangermouse is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.