Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Marshalls of Cambridge rules out move to Duxford

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Marshalls of Cambridge rules out move to Duxford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2020, 17:08
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ashwell
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Gone for housing. Covered with containers last time I flew over.
VictorGolf is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2020, 10:53
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In a world of my own.
Posts: 380
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What if Bassingbourn could be wrestled from the MoD? Just saying.

Aaron.
AARON O'DICKYDIDO is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2020, 11:48
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by medod
Quite so however developers are very careful not to build so many houses that prices (and thus profits) might fall.

Only social housing would or could reduce the cost of houses and that's not going to be happening anytime soon.
Got that right. A 250-property housing estate near me is being built at a rate of 25 homes a year. At one every two weeks the developers can practically name their price.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2020, 14:02
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Herod
Weathersfield would make quite a bit of sense. It's still owned by the MOD, and I believe the runway is in pretty good shape. Not a lot of built -up area around, and transport links are pretty good. About an hour by road from Cambridge, and the M25 isn't that far away. Possibly too logical?
Too close to Stansted, which was the reason it was closed in the first place.

Base leg for 22 runs parallel and half a mile north at 4000’ and “over the top” inbounds from the West pass directly overhead.
Company Message is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2020, 15:25
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by AARON O'DICKYDIDO
What if Bassingbourn could be wrestled from the MoD? Just saying.
Wouldn't be cheap to reinstate the runway and taxi ways though.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2020, 15:56
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brighton
Posts: 967
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
What about Bourn Airfield, it's close to Cambridge. Rural location and it's in use as an airfield so less issues in some respects. Relatively good road links too.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]

Bourn is already earmarked for housing
kenparry is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2020, 08:52
  #67 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,614
Received 289 Likes on 158 Posts
How about Manston? Good runway, fair bit of space for site development, don't how it fits in with their location requirements.
treadigraph is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2020, 09:43
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,532
Received 85 Likes on 57 Posts
I would imagine that for continuity purposes they would want to stay within commuting distance of Cambridge. If not I'm sure there are a whole host of potential sites that would be interested. Some of them are even active airfields.
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 01:14
  #69 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,836
Received 2,805 Likes on 1,195 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
I would imagine that for continuity purposes they would want to stay within commuting distance of Cambridge. If not I'm sure there are a whole host of potential sites that would be interested. Some of them are even active airfields.

Then surely the answer is Cambridge airport which is already developed sufficently for their needs and shove the bloody houses on those disused / closed airfields within commuting distance that everyone has discounted as unsuitable for flying operations, or am I being too logical.



..

Last edited by NutLoose; 5th Feb 2020 at 16:30.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 07:45
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,401
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
Nut - the Great British Public only see a large open area with a few aircraft wandering around every so often - and no-one likes commuting

TBH I could see the Council weighing 4000 jobs or so and saying "we can get 10,000 new jobs and a load of houses on that site" - on your way

Even more worrying is to look at the Marshall Group website - it lists their Property division as second to their Aerospace division...............
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 13:19
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
CM,
If Marshall's did relocate to Wethersfield I would imagine their traffic density would be low and relatively straightforward to co-ordinate with Stanstead arrivals/departures - certainly easier than Northolt/LHR due to numbers (though it may require yet another airspace grab). However, Wethersfield is, IIRC, fairly basic nowadays so there would need to be considerable infra investment which may well be beyond Marshall's means. Bentwaters / Woodbridge (if the upcoming SDSR closes it) are likely better options - though with a load of anti-flying locals - but at least other tenants to shoulder some of the costs. Still think Cranfield is favourite. Is North Weald too small?
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 13:39
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
Still think Cranfield is favourite. Is North Weald too small?
Probably more space at Weald than there is at Cranfield.
Probably more grumpy locals though, which will be the issue wherever they go these days.

Other than the mutual benefit maybe from the college and industry co-located in one place, I can't see there being enough space at Cranfield to build new facilities to replace what they have at Cambridge?
Unless the intention is to significantly reduce facilities once moved because of eventual C130 OSD?
GeeRam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.