Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

IRBM / Cruise Missile Attacks Against US Facilities Throughout Iraq

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

IRBM / Cruise Missile Attacks Against US Facilities Throughout Iraq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2020, 11:40
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like Iran decided to implement a compromised solution. On one hand, they were afraid of making POTUS (or, more generally, Uncle Sam "on the whole") too angry and therefore fired missiles into the sand. On the other hand, after all those cries from their mullahs and top military, they had to shoot at the US troops in one way or another, otherwise they would look weak. And they did fire, and some missiles even hit the territory of a US base.
Let's hope that US would not escalate on the military front. No doubt that economically they are preparing a mortal coil, but that's another story.
A_Van is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 11:51
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 506 Likes on 210 Posts
Or......they were tracking them and knew they would miss and thus no action required.

SASless is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 12:43
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: scotland
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Operation Mincemeat

Genral Qassim Soleimani=Operation Mincemeat.
ericsson16 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 12:45
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,954
Received 144 Likes on 87 Posts
Most international contingents have reported results openly.
Why the long blanket of silence from the U.S. side?
jolihokistix is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 13:22
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 506 Likes on 210 Posts
Perhaps you are not watching American Television very much.

President Trump will address the Nation at 11 AM (East Coast Time).
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 13:32
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Uka Duka
Posts: 1,003
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
Pentagon official line is "Iran missiles were aiming to miss..."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...q-latest-news/
Auxtank is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 13:56
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 506 Likes on 210 Posts
US Intelligence agencies had advance warning of the Iranian Missile attack it appears.

Reports suggest intercepts of "chatter" inside Iraq and Iran gave notice of the coming attack.

That comes as no great surprise considering today's technology and capabilities it provides in certain forms of intel gathering.

Also....no doubt there are Humint Sources available to the various Western Powers that could also be providing useful information.

I wonder if they are reading the posts here at pprune.....to see what the strategic experts among us are saying?
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 13:58
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
BBC reports:

Three missiles hit north-west of Irbil - Iraqi TV

Two Iranian missiles landed in the village of Sidan, in Irbil province, and a third hit the Bardah Rashsh district in neighbouring Dohuk province, Iraqi state TV reported.

Sidan is about 16km (10 miles) north-west of the city of Irbil, while Bardah Rashsh is 47km (29 miles) to the north-west.

Iraq's military said five missiles were fired towards the Irbil base, where US-led coalition forces are deployed

If Irbil was the airfield targetted, how come the missiles missed by 10 and 29 miles? That would explain why they weren't intercepted. It will be interesting to see the impact points at Al-Asad and may give a better clue as to Iranian capability/intel/intent.


just another jocky is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 14:56
  #49 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
President Trump address on the hour
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 15:29
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Somerset
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
Why are civilian aircraft with pax on board still flying along the Iran-Iraq border ? Even for airlines based in countries that have good relations with Iran (e.g. Qatar Airways) I would have thought that pilots as well as airline management would want to keep their aircraft well away from any area with heavy duty missile activity
Money. They won’t fly around until told that they cannot take the shorter route.
John4321 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 15:30
  #51 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
POTUS Statement:

Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon while he is President.
No Americans were harmed - no Iraquis killed.
Only minimal damage sustained at bases.
Iran appears to be standing down.
Early warning system worked.
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 15:46
  #52 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
POTUS Statement in full:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti_dZLZpTXg#t=35m38s
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 16:45
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Great yarmouth, Norfolk UK
Age: 72
Posts: 638
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
The US obviously had good intel to kill the General in the first place. No, I don't want anyone to break OpSec to speculate.
The question on my mind is: who benefits from his demise? The US of course, but what about within Iran.
Will someone there gain from such a 'popular' soldiers death, which they can conveniently blame on 'the great Satan?'

Sorry just been reading Tom Clancy again...…..
bobward is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 17:14
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,808
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
I’m just grateful that, reading between the lines, the score is deemed by Iran to be 1-1. Let us ALL hope that they leave this particular scenario as closed.

Nothing, of course, will stop Iran’s Shi’te/Sunni conflict.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 17:18
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bobward
The question on my mind is: who benefits from his demise? The US of course . . .
I don't think the US benefits in any material way. Soleimani will be replaced by someone with the same goals and intentions and leading the same forces with the same resources. Trump may benefit from approval of the move by his supporters, unless the widespread disapproval outweighs that.

. . . but what about within Iran.
Will someone there gain from such a 'popular' soldiers death, which they can conveniently blame on 'the great Satan?'
Of course. The leadership is already benefiting because this situation has diverted the masses from recent protests against the government. Soleimani, however, was a close associate of the "Supreme Leader," so it's pretty unlikely that the Iranians would have chosen this move if they were seeking a false flag option.
OldnGrounded is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 17:22
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MPN11
I’m just grateful that, reading between the lines, the score is deemed by Iran to be 1-1. Let us ALL hope that they leave this particular scenario as closed.
Yes. Here's fervently hoping. No one should imagine that a full-scale war with Iran and the US as principals would be anything less than a disaster for all concerned and the region in general -- at least.

Nothing, of course, will stop Iran’s Shi’te/Sunni conflict.
Or Saudi's, or Iraq's, or [insert favorite location where both sects live].
OldnGrounded is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 17:30
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
POTUS Statement:

Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon while he is President.
...
He should be cautious. JFK said the same to Israel and lived not even a year longer.
Interflug is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 17:35
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Uka Duka
Posts: 1,003
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by MPN11
I’m just grateful that, reading between the lines, the score is deemed by Iran to be 1-1. Let us ALL hope that they leave this particular scenario as closed.
Yes, I got that impression too.
We can but hope.
Auxtank is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 17:49
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 506 Likes on 210 Posts
When you see your predecessor turned into mince meat....it would tend to focus your mind upon the idea that following his lead might also lead to your own first hand experience with the full power of a Super Power wanting you to leave office with no notice as well.
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2020, 18:26
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Europe
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bobward
The question on my mind is: who benefits from his demise? The US of course, but what about within Iran.
The US is just about to be kicked out of Iraq, many trillion $ down the drain since 2003 for nothing! Leaving the field to the Iranians, the Russians and possibly ISIS. All the anti-iranian protests in Iraq - gone. The anti-government protests in Iran - gone. Iran rebooting their nuclear program. What a waste of money + time... What good intel? Successor to the general named, won't change a thing.

Last edited by onload; 8th Jan 2020 at 18:43.
onload is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.