Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US to Buy Back Swiss F-5s

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US to Buy Back Swiss F-5s

Old 16th Dec 2019, 07:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
US to Buy Back Swiss F-5s

Aggressor aircraft or as incentive/part eco change for new aircraft? Can’t think it anything to do with technology.....

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/bloomberg/switzerland-plans-to-send-its-old-fighter-jets-back-to-the-u-s-/45437142

Switzerland Plans to Send Its Old Fighter Jets Back to the U.S.


Bloomberg) -- The U.S. is expected to buy 22 aging fighter jets from Switzerland, a country that’s struggling to modernize its own air force.

U.S. Navy representatives and the Swiss defense procurement agency, known as Armasuisse, discussed the deal in July, an agency spokesman said by email on Sunday. The contract is expected to be signed once U.S. lawmakers approve the fiscal 2020 defense budget, he said.

President Donald Trump is seeking $718 billion in Pentagon funding for 2020, including $39.7 million for the F-5s, an aircraft first delivered to Switzerland in 1978. Nowadays, the U.S. uses the F-5 to simulate enemy planes in aerial combat training.

Switzerland has been trying to buy new warplanes for years. Voters in 2014 rejected a 3.1 billion-franc ($3.2 billion) order for Saab AB Gripen fighter jets. Switzerland now plans to spend about 6 billion francs on new fighter jets, according to SonntagsZeitung newspaper and previous Swiss media reports.

“If the Americans want to take over the scrap iron, they should do it,” Beat Flach, a Green Liberal lawmaker, told SonntagsZeitung, which reported on the planned sale on Sunday. “It’s better than having the Tigers rot in a parking lot.”

ORAC is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 08:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably an(other), or renewed, attempt to sell the Swiss F/A-18 E/Fs.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 08:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,370
Received 359 Likes on 208 Posts
The Swiss are nearly as bad as India as a country that can never come to a decision on military aircraft
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 08:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its what you get if you leave democracy to the uneducated public...
hoss183 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 09:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 410
Received 26 Likes on 15 Posts
Probably in good condition. Might make a useful addition to either a Mil or commercial aggressor outfit......
57mm is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 09:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 521
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by 57mm
Probably in good condition. Might make a useful addition to either a Mil or commercial aggressor outfit......
They are in very poor condition, which is why the Swiss are getting rid of them. Will likely be used for spares to support Taiwan's fleet and also the US Aggressor fleet.
Mil-26Man is online now  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 10:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Asturias56
The Swiss are nearly as bad as India as a country that can never come to a decision on military aircraft
LOL... You can add Canada to that list.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 10:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Drain Bamaged
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 56
Posts: 536
Received 32 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
The Swiss are nearly as bad as India as a country that can never come to a decision on military aircraft
And Canada as well.
Not sure why Swiss and Canada (try to) keep a front line jet fighters, they should ditch that the way New Zealand did.
ehwatezedoing is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 12:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Been around the block
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
They are in very poor condition, which is why the Swiss are getting rid of them. Will likely be used for spares to support Taiwan's fleet and also the US Aggressor fleet.
they are most certainly not in poor condition. Even the Jordanian ones were pretty good. I see them almost daily coming back from sorties, landing at NAS Boca Chica. They’ll get avionics upgrades and standardized. The ROC can produce their own spares, they built most of theirs.

Last edited by 4runner; 16th Dec 2019 at 12:45.
4runner is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 13:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 521
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by 4runner


they are most certainly not in poor condition. Even the Jordanian ones were pretty good. I see them almost daily coming back from sorties, landing at NAS Boca Chica. They’ll get avionics upgrades and standardized. The ROC can produce their own spares, they built most of theirs.
They are in a terrible condition. Just Google 'Swiss F-5 cracks' and/or 'Swiss F-5s grounded' - it's all there for you.

The ROC cannot build their own spares, which is why the US is trying to source them itself - https://www.janes.com/article/88184/...or-taiwan-f-5s

Now don't come back to me until you've done some research...
Mil-26Man is online now  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 17:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,576
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
The Swiss are nearly as bad as India as a country that can never come to a decision on military aircraft
Nowt wrong with a capability gap to save the tax paying public some moolah. I mean, we've done alright in the UK without an aircraft carrier and maritime patrol capability for going on a decade. Makes one wonder what all the fuss is about.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 18:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 521
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by dead_pan
Nowt wrong with a capability gap to save the tax paying public some moolah. I mean, we've done alright in the UK without an aircraft carrier and maritime patrol capability for going on a decade. Makes one wonder what all the fuss is about.
I'm minded to agree, though not sure how long the patience of our NATO allies who covered the MPA gap in particular would have lasted had a replacement not been on the horizon.
Mil-26Man is online now  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 18:08
  #13 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
It’s the same argument as for paying for safety.

If you think paying for a military capability is expensive - just wait till so see the cost of not having it when you need it.....
ORAC is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 19:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,601
Received 39 Likes on 26 Posts
The buyback of 22 F-5E/F aircraft is in 2020 DoD Budget for USN / USMC aggressor units.

"Moving on to the Navy, one unique item in today's budget materials was the inclusion of acquiring 22 F-5E/Fs Tiger IIs from the Swiss Air Force to fulfill fleet adversary support duties. The 44 F-5N/Fs that are currently flying with two US Navy and one Marine adversary squadrons came from surplus Swiss Air Force stocks. The delivery and refurbishment of those jets wrapped up roughly a decade ago and the fleet continues to age while demand for its services continue to rise."

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...budget-request

I expect that some / all will get modified to the current F-5N/F standard with updated avionics and other improved systems that the other ex-Swiss AF aircraft bought in 2006 got.
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2019, 19:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 521
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
The buyback of 22 F-5E/F aircraft is in 2020 DoD Budget for USN / USMC aggressor units.

"Moving on to the Navy, one unique item in today's budget materials was the inclusion of acquiring 22 F-5E/Fs Tiger IIs from the Swiss Air Force to fulfill fleet adversary support duties. The 44 F-5N/Fs that are currently flying with two US Navy and one Marine adversary squadrons came from surplus Swiss Air Force stocks. The delivery and refurbishment of those jets wrapped up roughly a decade ago and the fleet continues to age while demand for its services continue to rise."

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...budget-request

I expect that some / all will get modified to the current F-5N/F standard with updated avionics and other improved systems that the other ex-Swiss AF aircraft bought in 2006 got.
My understanding is that these latest buy-back aircraft will indeed 'support' the Agressor fleet, but will not increase the fleet. They will be used for spares.
Mil-26Man is online now  
Old 17th Dec 2019, 00:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: pluto
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I once flew a Swiss big cheese in the back of a jet they were thinking about buying. He gave me a watch as he got out as a thank you. They're still in the market I think.
blimey is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2019, 00:45
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Usually on top
Posts: 176
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
hoss183 Switzerland is the only truly democratic country in the world, and to rag their decision not to spend money on fighter jets because it contravenes your opinion is, well, undemocratic. The wisdom of the masses more often than not supersedes an individual's or small group's wisdom (or lack thereof). It also leads to economic stability. Just look at how strong the Swiss Franc remains, despite the absence of any natural resources in that country. They're doing something right. There are more important things to spend money on than fighter jets in a country whose borders are 60 seconds of afterburner time across, and whose air force only works office hours (c.f. Ethiopian hijack intercept a couple of years or so ago).
physicus is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2019, 00:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 608
Received 67 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by blimey
I once flew a Swiss big cheese in the back of a jet they were thinking about buying.
Was it damaged when they strapped it in?
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2019, 03:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Been around the block
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
They are in a terrible condition. Just Google 'Swiss F-5 cracks' and/or 'Swiss F-5s grounded' - it's all there for you.

The ROC cannot build their own spares, which is why the US is trying to source them itself - https://www.janes.com/article/88184/...or-taiwan-f-5s

Now don't come back to me until you've done some research...
any fighter will need structural repair/inspection over its lifetime. Just because they are due for parts replacement, isn’t a function of poor mx. It is a function of use. The contractor will overhaul the aircraft. The Swiss don’t want to overhaul theirs. Like our A-10’s. Our B-1’s and EA-6B’s also have g load limits and/or altitude limits imposed due to longer than anticipated use. It doesn’t mean they’re junk, it’s use.
4runner is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2019, 08:21
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 521
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
any fighter will need structural repair/inspection over its lifetime. Just because they are due for parts replacement, isn’t a function of poor mx. It is a function of use. The contractor will overhaul the aircraft. The Swiss don’t want to overhaul theirs. Like our A-10’s. Our B-1’s and EA-6B’s also have g load limits and/or altitude limits imposed due to longer than anticipated use. It doesn’t mean they’re junk, it’s use.
I don't think a metric exists by which you can claim that aircraft being grounded due to cracks are "most certainly not in poor condition".
Mil-26Man is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.