Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK Strategic Defence Review 2020 - get your bids in now ladies & gents

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK Strategic Defence Review 2020 - get your bids in now ladies & gents

Old 3rd Dec 2019, 18:57
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,937
Countdown begins and BVRAAM - are you the same person???
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:15
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 49
LJ, thatís a negative. Weíre both outlaws on here though, as non conformist, lateral thinkers.í
Countdown begins is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:20
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by Whenurhappy View Post
Too late - the big consultancies are over SDSR like a tramp on chips. All are offering their 'visioneering' and 'imagineering' across the services and the other SDDR players. At £1200 per consultant per day...

...Oh, and just to point out, SDSR is not conducted by the MOD. MOD and the three Services are active bystanders.
Thats not expensive when you look at nearly 1000 Wg Cdr and above on a directionless self licking lollipop.
Where is the ĎFocus on personnelí? Great in a pamphlet, but not over on Ops.
People first... anyone got any examples?
Ive recently left, so Iím not going to be quietened down by a boss that has no bullocks. I think an army of Deloitte etc would be worth paying, rather than have a load of pension calculators grinding the guys down with no tangibles to demonstrate to Ben Wallace.
Countdown begins is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:34
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,937
Originally Posted by Countdown begins View Post
LJ, thatís a negative. Weíre both outlaws on here though, as non conformist, lateral thinkers.í
LOL - so another couple of Edward de Bonos who think Marmite is the answer to world peace???

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/d...t-1133338.html
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:37
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Down South
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by Countdown begins View Post
The PoW and QE are future artificial reefs, nothing more.
Letís put them near... China for example. A years ago some clever Navy spokesman said about the acoustic range of QE... Ď doesnít matter as itís not an ASW assetí. Thatís maybe because itís the target, so... maybe itís acoustic range does matter?
Lions led by donkeys! We donít have enough P8s, helicopter canít do wide area surveillance and the RAF answer is to replace experience willingly for cheaper people. It will end in tears. When 20t of water floods in, itís a minor problem?!
I recall the article just 2 weeks ago when a helpful MOD spokesman told the papers the F35 had a 20:1 advantage. So 20 Chinese stealth, or Russian for that matter, and we offer SEAD or DEAD?
At the end of the day, thereís no getting real, thereís flag waving and euphoria, for whatever reason.
Time for the SDSR? YES. Time to outsource to Deloitte? YES, the MOD cannot be trusted, itís too much jobs for the boys, and little comprehension of the stakes the pilots face.
Our next war may not be against a country of tribes, but one against overwhelmingly stiff odds and a less belligerent canopy.
As opposed to the advantage ratio for the Typhoon?

They lose 20 assets, we lose one. Who has been disrupted the most?

Respectfully, it looks like Diane Abbott has done your maths for you.
BVRAAM is online now  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:44
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Down South
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by Mr. Vice View Post
In answer to a couple of your points:

1) The UK is leaving the EU yet is getting involved in Tempest with Italy and Sweden. Both nations who have no interest in the sort of expeditionary warfare we have been carrying out for decades. How will you develop and expand the platform to suit your needs when the partner nations share no interest in spending money to increase the capability? This is often seen in the Eurofighter Program.

2) I would be interested to see your figures on how the US spend a lot more 'item by item' than the UK does. I am pretty sure that given scales of economy the Australian procurement of US Hornets works out cheaper than the Typhoon purchase for the UK.

The US would not have total control over your kit and equipment and where you use it, that is nonsense. What it would give you is access to spares and combined development. As I mentioned before, UK industry could benefit from integrating great UK weapons on to US platforms and offering the US the benefit of our weapons if they did decide to purchase.

Finally, on what planet do you think we would ever get involved in an independent war. Look at the state of our current government and national appetite for overseas Operations. Get real, we are no longer a global super power. Lets move forward and integrate with the US, they have been involved in every single conflict we have been in for the past 30 years and we could not have done without them, the sooner we get over the notion of the UK as an independent Global Military Power the better.

Lets accept where we are, channel our funding to buy the best capability we can in order to seamlessly integrate with our preferred partner for the greatest combined effect.

Mr Vice.
I couldn't agree more.

The U.S. is the only country I fully trust. Integration means we can have more for less, as well. Win, win.
BVRAAM is online now  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:46
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,937
Originally Posted by Countdown begins View Post


Thats not expensive when you look at nearly 1000 Wg Cdr and above on a directionless self licking lollipop.
Where is the ĎFocus on personnelí? Great in a pamphlet, but not over on Ops.
People first... anyone got any examples?
Ive recently left, so Iím not going to be quietened down by a boss that has no bullocks. I think an army of Deloitte etc would be worth paying, rather than have a load of pension calculators grinding the guys down with no tangibles to demonstrate to Ben Wallace.
So what 1,000 Wg Cdr+ are these then? Also, have you any idea the amount of tripe that has been espoused by your suggested outsourced consultants that effectively regurgitate what they have been told after consulting with Service personnel? The average spend was over £5,000 per consultant per day back in 2011 - what have we got to show for that investment?(rhetorical question)

https://spendmatters.com/uk/mod-payi...ants-evidence/

You want some Ďlateral thinkingí? Empower your personnel with at least 15 years of experience to inform your leadership without diluting their message. Also, trust your people and delegate until you start to feel uncomfortable; then back it off a bit (just a bit).

By the way, ďpeople firstĒ is an invention just as much in the private sector as it is in the public sector. It just makes people feel good!
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 20:07
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 1,668
LJ

I read your post and it made me think of something I have thought about for several years.

We have the CASWOs conference where WOs tell CAS about the state of the nation.

Sqn bosses also have the opportunity to feed back to CAS quite regularly.

The one group who has no direct conduit (and I mean unfiltered without the spin of the Sqn Boss) to CAS is the JOs. And, since Iím a pilot, what I really mean here is the JO pilots.

There are roughly 30000 currently in the RAF. From memory I think there are just shy of 2000 pilots of all ranks. Most of the flying (both operationally and locally) is done by JO pilots. They are the ones who are keeping the ĎAirí in the name of the organisation. They are also basically ignored wholesale.

Iím not suggesting a Union but what I am suggesting is that maybe there should be a CASJOs conference. An opportunity for each flying unit (by all means expand it to all trades but that is not my area of expertise) to pick a genuine representative (not a thruster chosen by the powers that be but a Ďgood ladí who will say it how it is) who gets a chance to tell CAS exactly what is affecting those on the shop floor without fear of reprisal.

I think we ignore the JO cadre at our peril. Especially in the flying branch. For it is they who are doing our fighting (flying) and appear to be becoming more and more disillusioned. Denying them a voice is not helping.

Just my take on things. Obvs.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 20:33
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by BVRAAM View Post
As opposed to the advantage ratio for the Typhoon?

They lose 20 assets, we lose one. Who has been disrupted the most?

Respectfully, it looks like Diane Abbott has done your maths for you.
You miss the point, do we really think it has that advantage? 🤣
I feel itís more than just a tad over optimistic, perhaps even a little too arrogant.

Last edited by Countdown begins; 3rd Dec 2019 at 20:46.
Countdown begins is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 20:44
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet View Post
So what 1,000 Wg Cdr+ are these then? Also, have you any idea the amount of tripe that has been espoused by your suggested outsourced consultants that effectively regurgitate what they have been told after consulting with Service personnel? The average spend was over £5,000 per consultant per day back in 2011 - what have we got to show for that investment?(rhetorical question)

https://spendmatters.com/uk/mod-payi...ants-evidence/

You want some Ďlateral thinkingí? Empower your personnel with at least 15 years of experience to inform your leadership without diluting their message. Also, trust your people and delegate until you start to feel uncomfortable; then back it off a bit (just a bit).

By the way, ďpeople firstĒ is an invention just as much in the private sector as it is in the public sector. It just makes people feel good!
For the 1000+?? I suggest you google the word Ďlistí and do some detective work. It shouldnít take long! Adding RAF will shorten the time spent.
You hit the nail later in your post, though. Experience is key, and not understood. Once you have their views where should it go? The top wonít take it unstaffed, so whatever you do it will not be served fresh.
If Ďpeople firstí is just an invention, why waste the electrons and ink. If itís a fantasy then you lose your people, surely better to say nothing, then you never actually fail?
I do thank you for your 8 year old link though, from the age of serious austerity, Iím sure itís useful and relevant. Just for my benefit, could you tell me what the total cost for Project Gateway was? That was a well run, though late project that hacked us all off at the time, but now I hear itís working well.

Last edited by Countdown begins; 3rd Dec 2019 at 21:32.
Countdown begins is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 21:07
  #51 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 73
Posts: 3,016
BV. Nail, head. Agreed. Some things never change. I left, as a JO aircrew, over 40 years ago, and it was the same then.
Herod is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 22:11
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Down South
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by Countdown begins View Post

You miss the point, do we really think it has that advantage? 🤣
I feel itís more than just a tad over optimistic, perhaps even a little too arrogant.
It surely can't be that far off.
BVRAAM is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 09:21
  #53 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 852
"At £1200 per consultant per day..."

That's another problem - they're getting rubbish consultants if they're only charging £1200 a day - a decent management consultant is on over £ 500 an hour
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 10:51
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 829
Originally Posted by Bob Viking View Post
I read your post and it made me think of something I have thought about for several years.

We have the CASWOs conference where WOs tell CAS about the state of the nation.

Sqn bosses also have the opportunity to feed back to CAS quite regularly.

The one group who has no direct conduit (and I mean unfiltered without the spin of the Sqn Boss) to CAS is the JOs. And, since Iím a pilot, what I really mean here is the JO pilots.

There are roughly 30000 currently in the RAF. From memory I think there are just shy of 2000 pilots of all ranks. Most of the flying (both operationally and locally) is done by JO pilots. They are the ones who are keeping the ĎAirí in the name of the organisation. They are also basically ignored wholesale.

Iím not suggesting a Union but what I am suggesting is that maybe there should be a CASJOs conference. An opportunity for each flying unit (by all means expand it to all trades but that is not my area of expertise) to pick a genuine representative (not a thruster chosen by the powers that be but a Ďgood ladí who will say it how it is) who gets a chance to tell CAS exactly what is affecting those on the shop floor without fear of reprisal.

I think we ignore the JO cadre at our peril. Especially in the flying branch. For it is they who are doing our fighting (flying) and appear to be becoming more and more disillusioned. Denying them a voice is not helping.

Just my take on things. Obvs.

BV
Mate, don't over estimate the CASWOs conference, prime example of self licking lollipop. It is attended (largely) by people more interested in notionally creating 4 levels of WO... CASWO, Gp WO, SWO, WO. Hardly giving it to the man. I've met the last 3 CASWOs and despite giving it large about sitting at the top table none of them could provide an example of where they had influenced a decision for the betterment of personnel.
downsizer is online now  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 11:37
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sleaford
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by downsizer View Post
Mate, don't over estimate the CASWOs conference, prime example of self licking lollipop. It is attended (largely) by people more interested in notionally creating 4 levels of WO... CASWO, Gp WO, SWO, WO. Hardly giving it to the man. I've met the last 3 CASWOs and despite giving it large about sitting at the top table none of them could provide an example of where they had influenced a decision for the betterment of personnel.
Could not agree more. It is window dressing at best. The current incumbent brandishes a stick in photographs, why? Reaching WO/MACR was always the pinnacle for the non-commissioned ranks, apparently no longer......
OldnDaft is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 12:51
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,156
As some one who you guys defended or defended it saddens me to hear how the UK forces get treated especially at the individual level. Living where I do near Camberley there are a great many retired service personnel and have heard quite a few stories of the difficulties faced by service families and therefore service personnel.

it seems to me if you like as an end user in the defence world that we really must refocus on what our military objectives are. Forget the foreign involvment unless its aprt of a large multinational force and by that i dont mean 90% US and 10% us.

I do agree that some sort of deal with the US on Airforce hardware seems to work well enough for many EU countries but I dont think we can ever fully trust the USA -its always been America first and in terms of any serious land conflict we always have to be aligned with EU countries just because of Geography so in or out of the Eu we are tied to our neighbours -if a country threatens France it threatens us and vv . On the other hand would Trump trust Corbin or a Democrat trust Johnson
So for me cut back strategic spending-the carriers were a joke from the start and invest properly in people to prevent high wastage rates and in new technology be that smart agile weapons system which may in the end be air or ship-mounted and also take a decision over whether cyber threats are a police or Military/Security matter .

Russia if it is an enemy-I dont think it is personally -thats an EU /Euromatter because of Geography as to Iran if they want to attack Iraq again what can we do about it anyway. Its a matter of adjusting to resources and reality and most important is keeping a dedicated and motivated cadre of military personnel and equipping them to deal witht he 21st Centruy not the cold war or colonial past
pax britanica is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2019, 23:25
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Down South
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by pax britanica View Post
As some one who you guys defended or defended it saddens me to hear how the UK forces get treated especially at the individual level. Living where I do near Camberley there are a great many retired service personnel and have heard quite a few stories of the difficulties faced by service families and therefore service personnel.

it seems to me if you like as an end user in the defence world that we really must refocus on what our military objectives are. Forget the foreign involvment unless its aprt of a large multinational force and by that i dont mean 90% US and 10% us.

I do agree that some sort of deal with the US on Airforce hardware seems to work well enough for many EU countries but I dont think we can ever fully trust the USA -its always been America first and in terms of any serious land conflict we always have to be aligned with EU countries just because of Geography so in or out of the Eu we are tied to our neighbours -if a country threatens France it threatens us and vv . On the other hand would Trump trust Corbin or a Democrat trust Johnson
So for me cut back strategic spending-the carriers were a joke from the start and invest properly in people to prevent high wastage rates and in new technology be that smart agile weapons system which may in the end be air or ship-mounted and also take a decision over whether cyber threats are a police or Military/Security matter .

Russia if it is an enemy-I dont think it is personally -thats an EU /Euromatter because of Geography as to Iran if they want to attack Iraq again what can we do about it anyway. Its a matter of adjusting to resources and reality and most important is keeping a dedicated and motivated cadre of military personnel and equipping them to deal witht he 21st Centruy not the cold war or colonial past
You personally don't think the Russian Federation is an adversary?

How does the murder and attempted murder of former Russian security services agents on UK soil sound to you, using 'weapons' that even the most sophisticated organised criminal just can't get?

They're an enemy. Just because they aren't recruiting people in to throwing on a suicide IED, and walking in to shopping centre, doesn't make them less of a threat. The UK needs to equip its military with that threat in mind.
BVRAAM is online now  
Old 5th Dec 2019, 04:06
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,546
Originally Posted by Asturias56 View Post
"At £1200 per consultant per day..."

That's another problem - they're getting rubbish consultants if they're only charging £1200 a day - a decent management consultant is on over £ 500 an hour
that might be for a one-off consultancy, but across the big 4, thatís about the going rate for each consultant on an enduring contract. On top of that there is the cost for the assignment manager and partner involvement. A principal consultant is about £1500 per day; an analyst under £1000.

Of course thatís not what the individual receives in his or her pay packet, unless you are a freelancer.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2019, 04:45
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by BVRAAM View Post
You personally don't think the Russian Federation is an adversary?

How does the murder and attempted murder of former Russian security services agents on UK soil sound to you, using 'weapons' that even the most sophisticated organised criminal just can't get?

They're an enemy. Just because they aren't recruiting people in to throwing on a suicide IED, and walking in to shopping centre, doesn't make them less of a threat. The UK needs to equip its military with that threat in mind.
Russia is definitely a threat, no doubt.

Are they credible, not really.
Are they likely to do anything significant, I REALLY doubt it.
Am I worried about them, not in the slightest.

Ask me about the big country to the South of Russia....

Different league and will be the single biggest threat to the entire world and a true existential threat to the West within the next 2 decades. They scare me a LOT!
heights good is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2019, 06:46
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Bob Viking...

"Most of the flying (both operationally and locally) is done by JO pilots. They are the ones who are keeping the ĎAirí in the name of the organisation."

No other aircrew in the RAF then?... I take it you're a pointy driver then...
TwoTunnels is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.