Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lakenheath F-15's in Airprox with parachutists.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Lakenheath F-15's in Airprox with parachutists.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Sep 2019, 19:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Stitchbitch
I seem to remember a Hawk vs Paraglider near miss that happened fairly recently?
It's like trying to hold a conversation with children.

Of course there have been occasions like the one you quote, but you missed my point completely. Whilst I cannot comment on foreign forces, British military are taught from day 1 to always apply good Airmanship. It does not seen the same applies throughout the civilian world when it's absolutely ok to send 100+ gliders through the overhead of a busy military airfield with no warning or R/T contact. And it keeps on happening.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2019, 21:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Momoe
I would say that Class G airspace is a lottery with no winners, it's ridiculous that I could be thermalling, potentially in cloud with no transponder and sharing the same airspace with a FJ doing 500ft a second.
Originally Posted by just another jocky
It's like trying to hold a conversation with children.
Indeed - the though of operating in cloud without a procedural clearance or a radar service is abhorrent to professional aviators. Yet some in the glider community think it is fine to gamble with their live and those of others just to have fun.

There are far too many glider pilots who like to hunt through rules, regulations and laws and any time they find the word 'glider' missing they take as approval to do what they like.

If you cannot maintain safe separation from other aircraft then you are operating illegally. There is zero point learning the rules of the air and who has right of way if you cannot see where you are going and not receiving an appropriate radar service.

Last edited by Just This Once...; 14th Sep 2019 at 21:41.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 08:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Just This Once...
Indeed - the though of operating in cloud without a procedural clearance or a radar service is abhorrent to professional aviators. Yet some in the glider community think it is fine to gamble with their live and those of others just to have fun.

There are far too many glider pilots who like to hunt through rules, regulations and laws and any time they find the word 'glider' missing they take as approval to do what they like.

If you cannot maintain safe separation from other aircraft then you are operating illegally. There is zero point learning the rules of the air and who has right of way if you cannot see where you are going and not receiving an appropriate radar service.
Indeed m8. Meant to acknowledge your points regarding freefall parachuting but it got left out.

To add to the list; at a local airspace meeting a glider pilot representing one of the local sites acknowledged that many of their pilots will turn OFF their FLARM if they find a good thermal to prevent other glider pilots from using it to find the good thermals. It's utter madness.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 10:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 65
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In reply to justanotherjockey.

Please advise what the speed limitation is below10,000ft according to EASA ATS AIRSPACE CLASSES – SERVICES PROVIDED AND FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
Noted that you stated that you generally flew >300kts and 'practiced good airmanship'

Over to you
Momoe is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 10:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: French Alps
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Momoe
In reply to justanotherjockey.

Noted that you stated that you generally flew >300kts and 'practiced good airmanship'
Might be that military airmanship is to airmanship, what military music is to music ;-)

Fly Aiprt is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 11:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Momoe
In reply to justanotherjockey.

Please advise what the speed limitation is below10,000ft according to EASA ATS AIRSPACE CLASSES – SERVICES PROVIDED AND FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
Noted that you stated that you generally flew >300kts and 'practiced good airmanship'

Over to you
I suspect you are more than capable of answering your own questions.

Whilst there is an awful lot of GA traffic <10000ft, there is an awful lot of mil traffic above it. 0-10000ft is usually reserved for visual/radar circuit work (usually working a Traffic or Deconfliction Service), the lower part of ACT (many hours spent at max AoA at base height ) in protected airspace and descending/climbing. It is usually just the training world that spends a lot of time 0-10000ft and we are all mandated to be in receipt of Traffic Service where possible. It's probably a good job most GA pilots don't ask for Traffic Service as the radar frequencies would be blocked out.

To your last point, indeed I did. You seem to be making the assumption that going fast(er) displays poorer airmanship.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 11:24
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: French Alps
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by just another jocky
To your last point, indeed I did. You seem to be making the assumption that going fast(er) displays poorer airmanship.
Generally speaking, adhering to the airspace rules is considered an important part of airmanship.

Fly Aiprt is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 11:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 65
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair comment in that I do know the answer, as do you. My point is that I was in compliance and flying at >250kts below 10,000 isn't. (Whether the rules are robust enough for Class G is another matter entirely),

Accepted that military and GA work to different standards and yes, I fully accept that you would be better trained and have a greater skillset.

This doesn't alter the fact that we can both be compliant and and in conflict,

I'm not commenting further as I believe we both have genuine concerns about safety albeit from different ends of the spectrum.
Momoe is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 12:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,785
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Fly Aiprt
Generally speaking, adhering to the airspace rules is considered an important part of airmanship.
Generally speaking, knowing the rules is considered an important part of making snide comments about others’ adherence to the rules. Article 22 of the ANO specifically excludes military aircraft from the scope of all but a tiny proportion of the legislation (including the Rules of the Air). The military equivalent to the Rules is RA2307, which even has a note specifying visibility requirements for flight above 250kts below 10,000ft in Class G (and other classes; note 3 on page 5). You’re welcome.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 18:38
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,155
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy Street


Generally speaking, knowing the rules is considered an important part of making snide comments about others’ adherence to the rules. Article 22 of the ANO specifically excludes military aircraft from the scope of all but a tiny proportion of the legislation (including the Rules of the Air). The military equivalent to the Rules is RA2307, which even has a note specifying visibility requirements for flight above 250kts below 10,000ft in Class G (and other classes; note 3 on page 5). You’re welcome.
Damn, beaten to it.

Last edited by just another jocky; 15th Sep 2019 at 19:02. Reason: None.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 19:34
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Momoe
in compliance and flying at >250kts below 10,000 isn't..
Somewhat predictably the Professional Pilots Rumour Network has the odd professional pilot / aircrew amongst its numbers. Strangely enough the Mil Aviation bit has a few military dudes dotted about too.

If you remained VFR perhaps you could avoid your repeated foot vs mouth collisions.

Military flying is highly regulated, studiously supervised and rigorously debriefed for each and every tactical sortie, usually with an electronic replay or 2. So yes, military fast jets do indeed operate at fast speeds. Legally and professionally.
Just This Once... is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.