Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Heads Up! Fighter Pilot: The Real Top Gun

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Heads Up! Fighter Pilot: The Real Top Gun

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2019, 14:25
  #301 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sneaking up on the Runway and leaping out to grab it unawares
Age: 61
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet again you show youself up to be a total pillock.

As it happens I was a qualified CSRO so I know quite a bit about SERE. Generally speaking the girls were better than the boys at E & E, certainly at Camouflage and Concealment. In terms of R2I / CAC that's dependent upon personality and has damn all to do with one's sex.

SERE has **** all to do with being Infantry.
ExAscoteer is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 14:30
  #302 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAR dangerous ?

I once had to stay plugged in for 35 minutes at 33,000ft in thick cloud.

Tiring yes - dangerous certainly not - and it was in a real Lightning.

...hat...coat...door...
dook is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 15:51
  #303 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 36
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just thinking back to last night's episode, I think I remember there being five pictures on the role disposal board - other than Lightning and Typhoon I'm guessing Hawk and Texan creamie and 100 Sqn? But casting my memory back to the last (BBC?) series about Valley (Combat Pilot?), wasn't the favourite option for singlies a posting to Cold Lake for tactics and weapons training on the Hawk? In other words, was role disposal previously done between AFT and TWU, before a syllabus change? More to the point, I'm sure in that series a thumbs down meant starting the 'ceremony' again, including downing in one, which could get very messy if the powers-that-be saw a very different future in your stars.
Underbolt is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 16:04
  #304 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 545 Likes on 147 Posts
Underbolt

What you saw on the BBC Combat Pilot Programme was a ‘Creaming and Streaming’. That used to happen after AFT. Nowadays everyone moves from AFT straight to TW (standby for ENJPPT to reappear) so the C and S is redundant.

The role disposal has always happened after TW. The game is at the discretion of the graduates or their course commander or both. The only constant is that alcohol will be involved and someone will get spoofed at some point.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 16:15
  #305 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 798
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was really pleased to see daft games and loadsa booze still allowed in these PC days!
oldbeefer is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 16:24
  #306 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,707
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Interesting that it mentioined the young RAF pilot had had a prior posting in the States.
Davef68 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 17:28
  #307 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Alderaan System
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dook
AAR dangerous ?

I once had to stay plugged in for 35 minutes at 33,000ft in thick cloud.

Tiring yes - dangerous certainly not - and it was in a real Lightning.

...hat...coat...door...
I guess that, in a real Lightning, you needed to be plugged that long to take enough fuel to get back to Binbrook. From the Waddington o’head.

....hat.....coat....door

Last edited by Homelover; 4th Sep 2019 at 22:04. Reason: Grammar
Homelover is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 18:09
  #308 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually it was a six hour flight.

And I ask all contributors here to refer to Lightning 2 and not Lightning.
dook is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 18:22
  #309 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was a good series.
Im not sure I understand the RN lady going to a typhoon and the RAF chap to an F35 off a carrier but ho hum I’m sure they’ll do well.

Those parties must be a bit dull now as there’s not many options.

the other thing that struck me was the valley instructors seemed either 25 .....or 60.....how old do they let you carry on pulling G or is it a yearly medical or something ?
Meester proach is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 20:45
  #310 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,141
Received 223 Likes on 65 Posts
It seems I need to re-visit my RAF history. Some nice archive shots of Gibson and 617's Stirlings.
Herod is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 21:09
  #311 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 54
Posts: 206
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dook
Actually it was a six hour flight.

And I ask all contributors here to refer to Lightning 2 and not Lightning.

Well.....if you want to be picky, the English Electric Lightning was the Lightning II as the Lockheed P38 Lightning was Lightning ‘I’ for the RAF....

However the (US designation F35) is just known as ‘Lightning’ in RAF service, presumably Lightning GR1, or FA1?
DCThumb is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 21:16
  #312 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,262
Received 644 Likes on 233 Posts
Originally Posted by dook
Actually it was a six hour flight.

And I ask all contributors here to refer to Lightning 2 and not Lightning.
It is of course the 3rd Lightning ............
did the RAF have any of Lightning 1 in service?
langleybaston is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 21:29
  #313 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 20
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
It is of course the 3rd Lightning ............
did the RAF have any of Lightning 1 in service?
Evaluated, ordered, then cancelled. A couple were delivered to the UK, but were ultimately transferred to the USAAF.
Lono is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 21:34
  #314 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,660
Received 68 Likes on 43 Posts
lb, 3 were tested at B-D and rejected,returned to USA...no turbochargers fitted....
sycamore is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 22:23
  #315 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
I've only just managed to see it, having been watching the Johnson ar$e-kicking events for much of the last 2 days. But what an excellent last programme in the series!

Typhoon or F-35B....what a choice!
BEagle is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2019, 22:54
  #316 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sneaking up on the Runway and leaping out to grab it unawares
Age: 61
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly the 3rd program was the best of the 3.
ExAscoteer is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 05:03
  #317 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Choose typhoon.
I’d want more than one engine over a war zone.

And it’s more pointy .....faster....
Meester proach is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 05:57
  #318 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 520
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
presumably Lightning GR1, or FA1?
FGR1 I'd imagine
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 06:07
  #319 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 545 Likes on 147 Posts
Meester

The twin engine vs single engine issue is a perennial argument.

I remember posting a link on another thread about it a while ago. The thrust of which (you see what I did there?!) was that the USAF had conducted a study of aircraft losses due to engine failure between F15 and F16. Guess which had more losses? Answer: F15.

The reason given is that if an engine were to fail catastrophically it will most likely destroy the other engine and probably the airframe with it. Two engines means twice the chance of failure.

In this day and age, engine reliability is so good (and the F35 engine is a serious bit of kit) that statistics will show that you can rely sufficiently on one engine to keep you safe.

Typhoon is an awesome aircraft in every respect and is getting better all the time. F35 is also an awesome aircraft but their roles are subtly different. If I were a student at Valley I would be delighted to be sent to either aircraft. As things stand right now though, given a choice I would take F35 purely because it’s the new kid on the block.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 11:43
  #320 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Not far from EGPH.
Posts: 117
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
FGR1 I'd imagine
I've never seen any official source refer to the F-35B in RAF/FAA service with any "mark number". The RAF website (never a reliable source for official designations anyway) calls it the "F-35B Lightning"; the RN website calls it the "F-35 Lightning". Note the "II" seems to have gone missing over the Pond, but strangely not the "F-35".

Last edited by XR219; 5th Sep 2019 at 11:55.
XR219 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.