The idiots I see are indeed taking over the asylum
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,074
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
The idiots I see are indeed taking over the asylum
The following users liked this post:
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,816
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
I must try calling my wife 'It' and see what happens.
The following users liked this post:
A Royal Navy spokesman said: “The Royal Navy has a long tradition of referring to its ships as ‘she’ and will continue to do so.”
Whoever vandalised the museum might benefit from being introduced to 'The Captain's Daughter'!
I'm in a minority who have generally referred to aircraft as "it" rather than "she", but I have absolutely no objections to "she". I think it can go a bit far, though. On the Facebook V Bomber group, some of the XH 558 groupies on there have taken to referring to it as "Our Delta Lady" which I find a bit much. As an aside, there have been several candidates for "Queen of the Skies" over the years (Canberra, Boeing 747 etc), but no kings as far as I know.
Incidentally I don't think the defaced sign should be restored - it should be left as a monument to stupidity.
Incidentally I don't think the defaced sign should be restored - it should be left as a monument to stupidity.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,074
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
You just know that some poleclimber is thinking of setting up a Sexist Historical Investigation Team to get those naval aviators who have used 'mother' or 'mum' in radio transmissions when operating off a deck. But it's ok, the defence budget will get a hike to pay for retraining.
Damn, Teeters beat me to it - although I thought it was the Whirlwind that took that particular accolade while the mighty(!) Wessex held sway.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 61
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everyone has the right to be addressed as they wish, but getting offended at the proffered or perceived gender of an object is pure bollo**s (or should that be ovaries)? Far too many people trying far too hard to find offence. Good luck with your outrage if you live in France, Spain or other countries which ascribe gender to objects, inanimate or otherwise.😁
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 61
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don’t hold your breath...there’s an ongoing campaign for either more flexibility or gender neutral French, especially in some areas of the language, e.g when it comes to the use of the masculine gender in many job titles, but it’s a long way off being “binned”.
Thud and Blunder
.
If it's a Whirlwind here's two Queen Mothers together at Biggin Hill - April 1955.
Damn, Teeters beat me to it - although I thought it was the Whirlwind that took that particular accolade while the mighty(!) Wessex held sway
If it's a Whirlwind here's two Queen Mothers together at Biggin Hill - April 1955.
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Missouri
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, really HARD! They only have masculine and feminine articles. So, everything has to have SOME gender assigned. Spark plugs are feminine (la bougie) the earth is masculine (le Monde). Some of them actually make sense, but most make NO sense at all.
Jon
Jon
We are in the year 2019 and the Royal Navy has had mixed gender surface ship crews for years, and the submarine fleet is about to follow.
Why would a female onboard a ship want to call it she, why not he?
Why would a female onboard a ship want to call it she, why not he?