Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK orders Boeing E7...

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK orders Boeing E7...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2020, 15:42
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
I have lost track of this a bit. Was it ever confirmed that the order is only for 3? And is that the final number or more to come (Like F35B/A ???)
Timelord is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2020, 18:06
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,270
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
I don't think it is official (yet), I have seen a story that Boeing is trying to convince HMG they can afford four. Recent press releases from Boeing UK and STS don't include a fleet number unlike some earlier ones. Speculation suggests no maintenance contract was put in place and the likely costs of it plus training are the issue. A side issue is that the E-3 OSD is 12 months before E-7 Entry into Service.

MoD seems to have been avoiding answering the question.

Written Question on 22 SEP 2020 reply 28 SEP 2020
[QUOTE]Kevan Jones MP (Labour) (ex Defence Minister and Shadow Defence Minister), Member of the Defence & Intelligence and Security Committees

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what capability gap would be created for the Royal Air Force in the event that the order for five E-7 Wedgetail aircraft is reduced to three?

Jeremy Quin MP, Minister of State (MoD)
Reply
None. The E-7 Wedgetail is a step change in capability and reliability and meets the urgent need for an Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) capability as a critical enabler to UK military capability.

The transition from Sentry to E-7 Wedgetail will not result in any reduction in current capability.[/QUOTE]

If the existing capability is as f**ked as some have said then dragging Shacks and Gannets out of museums wouldn't represent a reduction in capability. Yes, I'm being facetious but 3 clapped out E-3s replaced by 3 new E-7s obviously wouldn't be a reduction in a capability which is severely degraded.
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2020, 18:22
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
Thanks. “The current capability” sounds like a very dubious yardstick.
Timelord is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2020, 16:42
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by BVRAAM
Ok, so this thing is being assembled here, which is good news for UK industry.

S?

As I read the press release, the empty airframes will be flown here, then STS will remove S 46 in the rear fuselage, fit the new section 46 (with the radar mount) then re-assemble the fuselage and install the mission systems.

So 'conversion' rather than assembly

I don't think the 'used' airframes for the UK have been publically identified yet, not whther they will be -700 airframes (As per RAAF) or -800 (as rumoured). Wouldn't be like us to screw things up by having a different airframe :-)
Davef68 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 09:30
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
Just confirmed by local MP that E7 to be based at Lossie alongside P8. Makes sense I suppose but Lossie is going to be one hell of a base. Is this all part of a negotiating ploy when Nicola gets her way?
Timelord is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 09:48
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Too far South
Age: 50
Posts: 120
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Timelord
Just confirmed by local MP that E7 to be based at Lossie alongside P8. Makes sense I suppose but Lossie is going to be one hell of a base. Is this all part of a negotiating ploy when Nicola gets her way?
It's been on the BBC news for about 45 minutes (as I type)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...tland-55351077
Lomon is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:00
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must say, didn't see that one coming although it makes some sense.

Whither Waddo?

Runway's too short for the RJ, Shadow doesn't need 9,000', Sentinel's off, Reaper et al probably won't fly from there. So just the Arrows...
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:14
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Willard Whyte
Must say, didn't see that one coming although it makes some sense.

Whither Waddo?

Runway's too short for the RJ, Shadow doesn't need 9,000', Sentinel's off, Reaper et al probably won't fly from there. So just the Arrows...
Indeed, the reds will be happy but I fail to see how the base will be maximised now the wedgetails are not coming. With Sentinels being stood down, this will leave 3 RJ’s and a few Shadows, all very strange!
SKOJB is online now  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:14
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Timelord
Just confirmed by local MP that E7 to be based at Lossie alongside P8. Makes sense I suppose but Lossie is going to be one hell of a base. Is this all part of a negotiating ploy when Nicola gets her way?
And here’s the official RAF press release, like everyone else no saw that coming ...but makes sense with co locating with P-8 sharing resources.

https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles...ased-in-moray/

chopper2004 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:20
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SKOJB
Indeed, the reds will be happy but I fail to see how the base will be maximised now the wedgetails are not coming. With Sentinels being stood down, this will leave 3 RJ’s and a few Shadows, all very strange!
Not forgetting Protector!
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...8nv7zDBfJPIjAu
LincsFM is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:31
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SKOJB
Indeed, the reds will be happy but I fail to see how the base will be maximised now the wedgetails are not coming. With Sentinels being stood down, this will leave 3 RJ’s and a few Shadows, all very strange!
Waddington will have to have a few more detached squadrons going in to make full use of the base!!
Boeing Jet is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:34
  #152 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lossie's going to be busy then. Kinloss would give them some room for manoeuvre though ie circuit bashing. I wonder if any cabs would be based at ISK?
 
Old 18th Dec 2020, 11:44
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,197
Received 114 Likes on 51 Posts
That decision will p1ss a few people off.
downsizer is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 12:03
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Where the heart belongs
Age: 55
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Green Flash
Kinloss would give them some room for maneuver though ie circuit bashing.
Not really, due to runway proximity, a certain amount of deconfliction was always required.
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 12:10
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know what the sim situation is going to be but a lot of circuit bashing is going synthetic anyway these days. It should be possible to have one front-end sim for both types, just flick a switch to go from P-8 to E-7. Depends on how common the flight deck is obviously.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 12:21
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,270
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
Idle Friday Speculation

Although it seems to make sense from the point of view of airframe commonality and being slightly more up threat, is this further signalling a reduction in the E-7 order?

With 8 going back to Lossie and 5 for the chop, if 51 go elsewhere as speculated, does it make operational sense to consolidate 14 and 54 at Lossie so the 'Locally Piloted' ISTAR force isn't split over three stations? Waddo then becomes the centre for RPAS and when 216 becomes fully operational swarm technology with RAFAT for company. (My naughty thought was they are a piloted swarm)

Does anyone know if XIII or 39 will disband once 31 becomes fully operational on Protector or will it be in addition to the existing squadrons?

Last edited by SLXOwft; 19th Dec 2020 at 09:58. Reason: missing -al
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 12:30
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dead Dog Land
Age: 77
Posts: 531
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by downsizer
That decision will p1ss a few people off.
Especially paying higher taxes. OK, they get it back but it's still extra buggeration.
The Oberon is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 12:34
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Oberon
Especially paying higher taxes. OK, they get it back but it's still extra buggeration.
Possibly more a case of not wanting a posting that far North.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 13:14
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Too far South
Age: 50
Posts: 120
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Green Flash
Lossie's going to be busy then. Kinloss would give them some room for manoeuvre though ie circuit bashing. I wonder if any cabs would be based at ISK?

Not without serious money being spent on properly refurbishing the place. It cost millions just to get it fit enough to use for limited Poseidon and Typhoon Ops during Lossie bolthole.
Lomon is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2020, 13:44
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hoofddorp The Netherlands
Age: 70
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read the link, and find the mistake:

https://thelincolnite.co.uk/2020/12/raf ... LBgDsNKyyM
spitfirek5054 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.