UK orders Boeing E7...
Fuselage Sections for First RAF E-7 Wedgetail Aircraft Arrive at Conversion Site in Birmingham
News of progess in the UK acquiring 'the world’s most effective AEW&C aircraft'.
Boeing UK issued a press statement on 2 November Boeing: Boeing UK - News Release
News of progess in the UK acquiring 'the world’s most effective AEW&C aircraft'.
Boeing UK issued a press statement on 2 November Boeing: Boeing UK - News Release
BIRMINGHAM, November 2, 2020 - Fuselage sections for the first two E-7 Wedgetail Airborne Early Warning (AEW) Mk1 aircraft for the Royal Air Force (RAF) have arrived to the United Kingdom and are on site at STS Aviation Services in Birmingham.
Section 46 is the part of the fuselage where the aircraft’s Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) radar will be installed. Later this month the first Section 46 will begin preparation for inclusion into a 737 Next Generation airliner. The conversion work – turning commercial 737s into a modern airborne battlespace management fleet – will create more than 100 highly skilled jobs in Birmingham with STS Aviation Services and Boeing.
Section 46 is the part of the fuselage where the aircraft’s Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) radar will be installed. Later this month the first Section 46 will begin preparation for inclusion into a 737 Next Generation airliner. The conversion work – turning commercial 737s into a modern airborne battlespace management fleet – will create more than 100 highly skilled jobs in Birmingham with STS Aviation Services and Boeing.
"News of progess in the UK acquiring 'the world’s most effective AEW&C aircraft'.
You should use the words "World Beating"
You should use the words "World Beating"
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Down South
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, so this thing is being assembled here, which is good news for UK industry.
So does this mean that we're putting our own avionics in it from scratch? Our very own AESA radar? Any open source information on this?
I did hear a rumour that this jet is going to be very similar in capability to the E-2D?
So does this mean that we're putting our own avionics in it from scratch? Our very own AESA radar? Any open source information on this?
I did hear a rumour that this jet is going to be very similar in capability to the E-2D?
Ok, so this thing is being assembled here, which is good news for UK industry.
So does this mean that we're putting our own avionics in it from scratch? Our very own AESA radar? Any open source information on this?
I did hear a rumour that this jet is going to be very similar in capability to the E-2D?
So does this mean that we're putting our own avionics in it from scratch? Our very own AESA radar? Any open source information on this?
I did hear a rumour that this jet is going to be very similar in capability to the E-2D?
Swapping out electronics on such an aircraft would hugely increase the costs. Just because new kit does the same task doesn't mean it works the same way, or even has the same inputs/outputs requirements.
A huge portion of the cost of these sorts of aircraft is in the integration of the electronics, and making sure not only due they play together but they don't interfere with each other. HIRF is a major problem - not so much external threats, but the frequencies coming from the other onboard equipment.
The beauty of using the same electronics as the Australian version is that the difficult integration stuff has already been done.
A huge portion of the cost of these sorts of aircraft is in the integration of the electronics, and making sure not only due they play together but they don't interfere with each other. HIRF is a major problem - not so much external threats, but the frequencies coming from the other onboard equipment.
The beauty of using the same electronics as the Australian version is that the difficult integration stuff has already been done.
Swapping out electronics on such an aircraft would hugely increase the costs. Just because new kit does the same task doesn't mean it works the same way, or even has the same inputs/outputs requirements.
A huge portion of the cost of these sorts of aircraft is in the integration of the electronics, and making sure not only due they play together but they don't interfere with each other. HIRF is a major problem - not so much external threats, but the frequencies coming from the other onboard equipment.
The beauty of using the same electronics as the Australian version is that the difficult integration stuff has already been done.
A huge portion of the cost of these sorts of aircraft is in the integration of the electronics, and making sure not only due they play together but they don't interfere with each other. HIRF is a major problem - not so much external threats, but the frequencies coming from the other onboard equipment.
The beauty of using the same electronics as the Australian version is that the difficult integration stuff has already been done.
It is also my understanding that the commonality with the RAAF Wedgetails is extremely high - wise heads want(ed) to ensure the UK was on the same upgrade pathway as the RAAF so the E-3 divergence fiasco isn't repeated.
However, the UK Defensive Aids System will be delivered by Leornado, with Thales sub-contracting for its Elix-IR Threat Warning System. The Leonardo system is, I understand, a newer version of the Electronic Warfare Suite Controller already fitted to the RAAF's Wedgetails. So I would think/hope that at some point that both AFs will be using the same version.
Asturias - Boeings words not mine hence the quote marks. I am in no position to make such an assessment.
However, the UK Defensive Aids System will be delivered by Leornado, with Thales sub-contracting for its Elix-IR Threat Warning System. The Leonardo system is, I understand, a newer version of the Electronic Warfare Suite Controller already fitted to the RAAF's Wedgetails. So I would think/hope that at some point that both AFs will be using the same version.
Asturias - Boeings words not mine hence the quote marks. I am in no position to make such an assessment.

Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Down South
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After all, 'Rivet Joint' is a pretty cool name but the RAF managed to make it seem lame by naming ours 'Airseeker.'

I initially thought Bruce...
But then it was originally Australian, it sticks its nose into other peoples' business and tells everyone about it so either the Pilger AEW Mk 1 or the Greer AEW Mk 1,
But then it was originally Australian, it sticks its nose into other peoples' business and tells everyone about it so either the Pilger AEW Mk 1 or the Greer AEW Mk 1,