Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

USAF looks for new ejector seat

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

USAF looks for new ejector seat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2019, 14:54
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
You are mistaken.
We say eject on aircraft with ejection seats.
We say bail out on aircraft without them.
Just so that you understand the difference, for over 30 years the USN's primary trainer was the T-34C, which required a bail out under various conditions. For 20 or so years before that, the T-28 B and C were also bail out/parachute equipped primary training aircraft.
At the same time, the advanced trainers -- T-2, TA-4, then T-45, were all ejection seat aircraft.

Likewise the T-37/Tweet. Primary training, ejection seat, and we still say eject. Likewise in the T-6 Texan II.

Old adage among the American carrier pilots: "There are those who have ejected, and those who will."

@Herod: Our military has DOPMA, yours does not.
After 25 years, my up or out choice was to choose to stay until 28, one last assignment somewhere else, or to hang up the cleats and stay where I was.
With the kids settled in schools, and the wife finishing her degree, it was time. I was never going to be an admiral.
Bring it.
any premature ejeculation, ehm... I mean ejection?
Blohm is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 14:59
  #22 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,368
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
I am reminded of the old joke of the Englishman who walks up and ask an American standing in a hotel lobby, “excuse me, is this the express lift?

”Elevator”, replies the American, “we invented the elevator”.

“Lift”, responded the Englishman, “we invented the language”.
ORAC is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 15:27
  #23 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,368
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
The first ejector seat was patented by the British inventor Everard Calthrop who patented a pneumatic ejector seat in 1916.....
ORAC is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 16:10
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fresno
Age: 74
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
According to Martin-Baker (who, I think we all agree, should know) they make Ejection Seats.
Thud105 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 16:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,197
Received 114 Likes on 51 Posts
I think it's safe to say this thread sums up the uselessness of this forum these days.....
downsizer is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 16:55
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,060
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Tankertrashnav
Lonewolf - ejector/ejections seats? You say flight suit, we say flying suit, you say airplane we say aeroplane, you say (eg) 214th Squadron, we say 214 Squadron, etc. Does it really matter? We both know what the other is talking about.
I can live with most of those differences, but "afterburner" sounds so much better than "reheat". Reheat sounds like something you do when your tea gets cold....

And don't get me started on how to spell tires....
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 18:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Thud105
According to Martin-Baker (who, I think we all agree, should know) they make Ejection Seats.

indeed, and very very good they are too!

oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2019, 18:31
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Blimey, I didnt think I'd start all this when I posted my light-hearted comment above!

Lonewolf; Expect incoming from TTN. I suspect he has more military time than you. And on a real aeroplane (English spelling) to boot.
We say eject on aircraft with ejection seats.
We say bail out on aircraft without them.
Ironically, on the V Force, as is well-known, only the pilots had ejector (sic) seats, we second-class citizens down the back had to bail out!

And don't get me started on how to spell tires....
I remember seeing an advert for "tires" in an British magazine from the 1890s. I think a lot of these so-called "American" spellings are in fact old English spellings which we have changed but which the ever conservative Americans have retained.

Anyway, bye for now, I'm "tired"
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2019, 09:09
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sleaford
Posts: 80
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by downsizer
I think it's safe to say this thread sums up the uselessness of this forum these days.....
Almost as useless as E-Goat.....
OldnDaft is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2019, 09:40
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
You are mistaken.
We say eject on aircraft with ejection seats.
We say bail out on aircraft without them.
Who's 'we'?

I've flown with the USAF, and it uses "Bailout" as the command to eject. It uses "Egress" as the command to unstrap and get out in a ground emergency.

I have also flown with the US Navy and seem to recall they used the exact same terminology, but I stand ready to be corrected.

The RAF uses "Eject".

Honestly, if you're going to be such a pedant, get your own stuff right first!
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2019, 09:42
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
I think it's safe to say this thread sums up the uselessness of this forum these days.....
Indeed. What we need is a good-going ejection/ejector seat thread about the HSE's new admission that it did not review the exculpatory evidence in the Red Arrows/Cunningham case, but told the Judge it did and it was 'irrelevant'; why the Judge is happy with this; and why MoD denied having the information that would have saved Sean, knowing that it did and had instructed maintainers not to use it. Oh, and why Lincolnshire Police, faced last month with this fresh evidence, now deny all involvement - which might puzzle the MAA who had to wait 10 months before convening the Service Inquiry while Plod carried out their investigation. Somebody's lying, and it ain't Martin-Baker. Who happen to make very fine products and I hope win the US competition. That's if they run one.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2019, 12:23
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,197
Received 114 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by OldnDaft
Almost as useless as E-Goat.....
True enough, not what it once was, but then you still drop by.
downsizer is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2019, 17:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Originally Posted by Ewan Whosearmy
I've flown with the USAF, and it uses "Bailout" as the command to eject. It uses "Egress" as the command to unstrap and get out in a ground emergency.
I have also flown with the US Navy and seem to recall they used the exact same terminology, but I stand ready to be corrected.
The RAF uses "Eject".
Honestly, if you're going to be such a pedant, get your own stuff right first!
I already explained the difference, explicitly, in that very post. (Yeah, egress is indeed a commonly used term for ground exit).
As far as the USN goes, I know I am correct. Last time I was in a T-45 it was a briefing item. The call being "eject, eject, eject."
If the USAF has for some reason chosen to call for "bail out" rather than "eject" in ejection seat aircraft, that would be a surprise to me.
It's been over a decade since I last worked a joint training program. That (alleged) difference never came up, though a variety of other differences did.
I am going on my memory over yours. How long ago is your reference from?

As thud105 pointed out:
According to Martin-Baker (who, I think we all agree, should know) they make Ejection Seats.
@tucumseh: Martin Baker has a long and well established rep on this side of the pond. For good reasons. I have quite a few friends who have enjoyed an E-Ticket ride for real in a Martin Baker seat.
In a box somewhere, I've got a small caterpillar pin, and a card that shows that I have joined the caterpillar club. But that was a long time ago.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2019, 19:39
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
I am going on my memory over yours. How long ago is your reference from?
USAF F-15 and F-16 starting 2002 and ending 2015.
USN F/A-18 2010 (once only, hence my willingness to stand corrected).

The Air Force doesn't use 'Eject' because it doesn't want confusion on the ground when 'Egress' is called. I believe they moved that model in the 1980s when an F-4 A/C called "Egress!" during a ground emergency, but the back seater heard "Eject" and pulled the handles. Sadly, the pilot had already started to unstrap and did not survive the ejection.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2019, 02:50
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Originally Posted by Ewan Whosearmy
USAF F-15 and F-16 starting 2002 and ending 2015.
USN F/A-18 2010 (once only, hence my willingness to stand corrected).

The Air Force doesn't use 'Eject' because it doesn't want confusion on the ground when 'Egress' is called. I believe they moved that model in the 1980s when an F-4 A/C called "Egress!" during a ground emergency, but the back seater heard "Eject" and pulled the handles. Sadly, the pilot had already started to unstrap and did not survive the ejection.
Interesting perspective. My first brief on that was in 1978, in a T-2.
The brief was that if after I heard the third "eject" I was still in the aircraft, I was late already.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.