Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tornado RAPTOR - how much of a capability gap?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tornado RAPTOR - how much of a capability gap?

Old 1st Feb 2019, 19:13
  #21 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,501
UTC was proposing the "slimline" MS-110 pod back in 2015.

Litening 5 is no rubbish, however. Among other things it is intended to help targeting for Spice guided bombs (which use EO scene-matching guidance) beyond the range at which [email protected] designation works, so it has bigger optics than the earlier versions as well as being fused/multispectral. So it may have been decided that the difference between L5 and MS-110 is not worth the cost of buying and supporting a whole new pod.

The current EOTS on the F-35 is not in the same class; the Advanced EOTS is not under contract as far as I know, and even if you have a fabulous sensor it helps to have a way to record its data and get it off the airplane.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2019, 21:27
  #22 (permalink)  
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 51
Originally Posted by Rhino power View Post
I seem to remember reading that the RAPTOR pod won't fit on the centreline station due to clearance issues (u/c doors and/or ground, I forget now...) and can't be hung under wing because of asymmetric load conditions. I believe at one time there was talk of developing a pod specifically for Typhoon, but this seems to have come to nought...

Why do you think this could be?
weemonkey is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2019, 23:27
  #23 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,114
Originally Posted by weemonkey View Post
Why do you think this could be?
Huh? I don't get what you're asking...

Rhino power is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2019, 23:58
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 3,913
It came to naught (if that's what you're asking) because it wasn't considered enough of a priority to justify developing a new pod - acquiring the French pod may have been problematic in that it could have been felt to be a point of differentiation for the Rafale on export markets.

It was looked at, and my sources tell me that so was putting DB-110 or MS-110 on a Voyager or a Herc. That hasn't happened, unless someone else's sensor has been fitted (El-Op?).
Jackonicko is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.