Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

USN Commissions VRM30 - first CMV-22B Squadron for COD

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

USN Commissions VRM30 - first CMV-22B Squadron for COD

Old 26th Dec 2018, 09:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
USN Commissions VRM30 - first CMV-22B Squadron for COD

The US Navy (USN) has begun the transition from the C-2A Greyhound carrier onboard delivery (COD) aircraft to a modified variant of the Bell-Boeing MV-22 tiltrotor with the commissioning of Fleet Logistics Multi-Mission Squadron 30 (VRM 30) as its first CMV-22B squadron.

The USN in 2015 selected the CMV-22B tiltrotor to meet its Airborne Resupply/Logistics for Seabasing (AR/LSB) requirement, eschewing the alternative option of a life extension for the legacy C-2A Greyhound COD aircraft. Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) awarded the Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office a USD151 million contract in March 2016 for nonrecurring engineering associated with CMV-22B development/engineering change proposal (ECP) embodiment.

According to the navy, the CMV-22B acquisition approach is based on the re-use of a mature platform - in the shape of the MV-22B Block C aircraft - adapted with ECP modification to integrate a series of navy-specific subsystems/requirements: the ECP will add extended range capability with aft/forward external conformal fuel tanks on wings and sponsons, a public address system for use while transporting passengers, fuel jettison capability, cargo bay and loading ramp lighting, and secure beyond-line-of-sight communications with a high frequency (HF) radio.

The main driver for the CMV-22B is to transport the Pratt & Whitney F135 engine - the powerplant for the US Marines Corps' (USMC's) F-35B and the USN's F-35C variants - direct from shore bases to carrier decks. Being able to put the F135 power module inside the tiltrotor is significant because the capability to transport the load internally extends range out to 1,000 n miles. In addition, the CMV-22B will enable direct delivery to amphibious ships as well as carriers.

VRM 30 was formally established on 14 December in a ceremony at Naval Base Coronado in San Diego, California. The first CMV-22B aircraft are scheduled to be delivered to the squadron in fiscal year 2020 (FY 2020).
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 09:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
How does the UK intend to move F-35B spares to the QE-class carriers?
BEagle is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 12:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
Assuming tthe UK can afford any spares I guess it will be alongside in Portsmouth... no budget for COD I believe and you wouldn't want to transfer at sea - the USN certainly won't
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 12:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
How does the UK intend to move F-35B spares to the QE-class carriers?
I believe this will not be an issue as they intent to have everything on board. Trawl F35 cancelled thread ...
weemonkey is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 12:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,808
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
See this post by Engines on the Future Carrier thread.
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 13:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 466 Likes on 190 Posts
Wee, Just how good are Aircraft Engineers at forecasting spares usage?

If the assumed spare usage is correct for the planned operational period....fine.

What happens when the deployment gets extended....remembering some of our Carriers have stayed at sea and operational for very long times....what then?

Can the UK Carriers conduct underway replenishment to transfer those lacking Spares?

Does the RN have the cargo carrying capacity to do a re-supply to the carrier for those odd items that might be missing from the Carrier stocks in a timely fashion?

It is a long way from Plymouth to the Persian Gulf.

Are your carriers capable of 159 days at sea without a Port Call....without being resupplied with aircraft spares, food, fuel, armament, etc?

https://products.kitsapsun.com/archi...rier_to_d.html
SASless is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 14:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Wee, Just how good are Aircraft Engineers at forecasting spares usage?

If the assumed spare usage is correct for the planned operational period....fine.

What happens when the deployment gets extended....remembering some of our Carriers have stayed at sea and operational for very long times....what then?

Can the UK Carriers conduct underway replenishment to transfer those lacking Spares?

Does the RN have the cargo carrying capacity to do a re-supply to the carrier for those odd items that might be missing from the Carrier stocks in a timely fashion?

It is a long way from Plymouth to the Persian Gulf.

Are your carriers capable of 159 days at sea without a Port Call....without being resupplied with aircraft spares, food, fuel, armament, etc?

https://products.kitsapsun.com/archi...rier_to_d.html
I don't think the RN have ever had the ability to air move large items from the UK directly to a deployed carrier at sea so it's not exactly a new problem set.
The carriers in the Falklands war managed a significant period at sea without a port call, so again not a new problem.
Different to the USN doesn't necessarily mean worse, acquiring a CMV-22B capability for the UK would be a significant cost for a limited increase in capability due to the small numbers involved.
Bing is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 15:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,060
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Agree with those above that this is not as huge an issue that some insist it is. How did Phantom, Sea Harrier, SeaHawk etc. main engines get aboard? While COD is indeed nice to have, carrying spare engines to the air wing is not the main need.

Last edited by sandiego89; 26th Dec 2018 at 18:35.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 15:45
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
I think we need to keep in mind that the QE's are not meant to replicate the Nimitz/Ford CVN's in either role or capacity.

Better to think of them as upgraded "thru deck cruisers" - I do have a horrible worry that this distinction may "go missing" with the passage of time and there'll be repeat of the WW1 "Battle Cruisers are as good as Battleships" disaster

The UK can't afford all the bells and whistles so there will be (necessary) adjustments and lack of capability cp the USN vessels
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 18:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 466 Likes on 190 Posts
What is the expressed Operational Use is envisioned for the two Carriers?

How would they be used to supplement/augment the US Navy Carrier fleet?

As you Brits and the French seem quite friendly these days I suppose there would be some common use for the two Nations as well.

Are the two British Carriers decks hardened to enable Osprey landings?
SASless is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 18:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An Osprey has already landed on the Queen Elizabeth.
Lynxman is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 18:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 466 Likes on 190 Posts
Any damage to the deck from the hot exhaust?
SASless is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 19:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Nelson didn’t need Carrier OnBoard Delivery / Maritime intra theatre Lift , so why would we need it now?

UK MITL via V-22 is most likely to be a complementary capability to the strategic benefits tiltrotor would provide to a Carrier Strike Group.
Autorev is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 19:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 466 Likes on 190 Posts
An Osprey has already landed on the Queen Elizabeth.

That is much different from being embarked and operating from the Carrier.....much akin to the following video.

https://www.boldmethod.com/blog/vide...craft-carrier/


COD.....you say you want a COD....well boyo....here's a COD for you!
SASless is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2018, 21:10
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,268
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Remember that a US carrier has upwards of 80 aircraft embarked so logistics is very different from the half squadron that the UK is used to and the QE carriers wont have many more. the CMV-22 can uplift Hornet engines as well as helo and E-2 engines which are modular...
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2018, 01:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fife
Posts: 271
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With apologies for stirring up the thread drift, a chap I once knew in naval stores was influential in getting a replacement gearbox down to Invincible during her passage south in '82.

I do know that it was flown down by Herc (and I believe sourced from Gib), but I've often wondered how did they ever actually get the thing aboard? Flown to Ascension and barged across? Or was a Chinook able to lift it?

But in answer to the modern day quandry, I suspect UK jets out on sandy ops would simply be rotated, all be it shipped home rather than trailed if U/S.

Quite happy to be contradicted though

Cooch
Coochycool is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2018, 07:50
  #17 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,225
Received 1,495 Likes on 677 Posts
I imagine if a sudden emergency arose the RN would able to, perhaps, ask the USN to delver the cargo?

The QE will, after all, be hitting a USMC F-35B squadron for at least the first couple of years of her operational life; and, who knows, perhaps on an ongoing perhaps more permanent basis.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 27th Dec 2018, 10:50
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 858
Received 33 Likes on 16 Posts
It's been a few years since I worked on aircraft and when I did, it was not unusual for the aircraft to return with a multitude of faults. However theses days, I believe that the serviceability rate is significantly higher.

So although there will be a need for spares, I assume that the amount or range required will not be as great as previous deployments.
Saintsman is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2018, 17:42
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 466 Likes on 190 Posts
The F-35 rotates its nozzle(s) up away from the deck after landing....not so the Osprey with those rather awkward Prop Rotor things either whacking the Deck or Grooming the Marshaller's Top Knots.
SASless is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2018, 15:40
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,254
Received 329 Likes on 194 Posts
"That is much different from being embarked and operating from the Carrier..."

true - but it doesn't have to - it operates from where the engines are stored , drops in, unloads engine and goes home ..... Amazon really......
Asturias56 is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.