Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

IUR ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Nov 2018, 17:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
IUR ?

Just wondering if anyone can answer the following, does anyone know what the initials IUR stand for in relation to the Panavia Tornado? i.e. UE is made up of 12 GR1s plus one IUR.

Best Regards,

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2018, 17:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
In Use Reserve
pr00ne is online now  
Old 6th Nov 2018, 17:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
As in not counted in Unit Establishment, so no allocation of support resources, funding or people, aircrew or groundcrew, who are a multiple of the total UE.
pr00ne is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2018, 10:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
In days of yore IUR (and TAE, half TAE, IR6, etc) were fully fitted, unless specifically stated in the LTC 'C Sheets' issued by Main Building. The support allowances (Distributed Allowances) were based partly on allowable flying rate and all aircraft counted; although clearly non-FAE (Front Line Aircraft Establishment) contributed less to the calculation as their flying rate was much lower. Much of this changed as a result of swingeing savings measures in the late 80s; but no support resources for IUR is, some might say, a step too far. I know at the same time AMSO decided to scrap War Reserves to save money, which someone probably got a gong for but it didn't half explain problems in the GW1 build up. There are other ways of 'adjusting' the formula (called 'STOCKCAL') to protect reserves and still meet the dreaded targets. The RN posts that did this disappeared completely in about 1990, by which time the RAF's had already gone. The nearest you've got now is the Requirements Manager but I never knew one who understood that maintaining the integrity of STOCKCAL is one of his primary jobs.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2018, 12:50
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Many thanks Gents, I had an idea in the context that the initials appeared that it would be something along these lines. I thought perhaps a two-sticker over and above the UE.

Best Regards,

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.