Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Does Blackbird successor Lockheed SR-72 Aurora actually exist?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Does Blackbird successor Lockheed SR-72 Aurora actually exist?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2018, 15:47
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: River Thames
Age: 69
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Considering the secrecy and security levels for Groom Lake/Area 51...and knowing its background....one must wonder why it continues yet today.

There must be some very sensitive programs going on there for sure.
​​​​​​FWIW some chums stopped by Area 51 a couple of months ago and believe that they were watching some sort of drone demos with a 'parent' aircraft, very similar to
; they were very impressed with the performance of the objects that they watched. I guess that if what's shown in the video is a vision of 2030, it's not unreasonable that such things are being tested now.
Janet Spongthrush is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2018, 23:04
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Misformonkey

I don’t see the link between the x-37 and x-47?
My typo.
I meant X-37c.
Apologies.
tartare is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 04:02
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
Boeing patent

chopper2004 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 08:12
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wilds of Warwickshire
Posts: 240
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
X37b

One of the possibilities is that the X37b is the ‘mother ship’ and carries a LO vehicle which can manouver independently to overhead areas of interest.
This gets round the ‘you can see it coming’ problem and would explain the long mission times.
KiloB is online now  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 13:22
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Perhaps this story has passed its 'sell by' date. The claims have been around for the past 30 years and nothing has shown up.
In contrast, the SR 71 broke cover within much less than a decade, during the height of the cold war, when security mattered.
Even the core design aspects of the H bomb were leaked within a 30 year time frame, despite diligent security efforts.
It may be that the intelligence bang for the buck is so much greater in digital snooping than in overflight that the resources were shifted, but the USAF still benefits from the mystery.
etudiant is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 19:03
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm pretty certain Gerry Anderson had the concept first.
Harley Quinn is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2019, 23:17
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
That was doing the rounds back in 2003-2004 time frame (the patent rather than the watercolors). I remember because I was annoyed that the flight sim X-Plane couldn't handle that configuration.

As I recall, only the fruitloop sites thought it was anything other than IP protection.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 17:54
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by The AvgasDinosaur

Perhaps, the Mach 5 wondership gets you to the point of interest quickly, then slows down to do its 'observations' then gets its take home quick
Serious question how long would the heat soak take to cool down sufficiently to avoid IR detection?
thanks for your time and trouble.
Be lucky
David
Any one got any ideas yet ?
Thanks for your time and trouble
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 18:02
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SpeedFanatic
Hello,

First time poster/long time lurker here. This thread has lot of beautiful ideas and tidbits, some of them I can confirm with the things I know.
Gulf War I - F-117s flew along with another, yet undisclosed, bird. The unknown aircraft played as an "door-opener" for Nighthawks during their bombing runs. The situation happened again in the early 2000's during the first few nights of OIF. The unknown bird was supposed to be around a few years back, way after they retired F-117. So it is more like just "Nighthawk's helper". It is EW jet with little strike potential, too. It was built in smaller numbers than F-117.

A question to Ewan Whosearmy:


Could you provide name of the pilot's autobiography? Would love to read it!
I understand that some of the first F-117 crews deployed in GW1 had team stealth patches with two dissimilar silhouettes on them. These were hastily replaced by standard patches. Could the other aircraft be the oft rumoured TR-3 ? Developed from the YF-23 which was stealthier than YF-22 but much more expensive, and built in much smaller numbers ?
I too would like details of that autobiography.
Please.
Be lucky
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 18:59
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,526
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
Could the other aircraft be the oft rumoured TR-3 ?
Or maybe somebody was having a laugh?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 22:34
  #91 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
I'd love to know what the bright light was that I saw in formation with the ISS a few years ago as it passed over the northern hemisphere. There was nothing published about a re-supply mission yet there it was, in trail.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 07:39
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,576
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
I'd love to know what the bright light was that I saw in formation with the ISS a few years ago as it passed over the northern hemisphere. There was nothing published about a re-supply mission yet there it was, in trail.
Somehow I doubt it was anything that secret seeing as the Russians would have had a front row seat from their section of ISS...

An experiment maybe? Also they do fly microsatellites from ISS on occasion.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 07:49
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,576
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
According to Ben Rich "Aurora" was a Pentagon name allocated for funding the B-2 programme... Or something like that.
I attended an academic conference in the US last year when a delegate stated with all seriousness that Ben RIch had found an error in Einstein's famous formula, and that the US military were in cahoots with forces beyond our planet. How the rest of us laughed.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 08:58
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,761
Received 2,742 Likes on 1,168 Posts
Of course it exists, only a fool...... or the British Government..... would withdraw a strategic asset without having a replacement ready to enter service.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 09:23
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,372
Received 360 Likes on 209 Posts
"a fool...... or the British Government..... would withdraw a strategic asset without having a replacement ready to enter service. "

Nut - I think you need to add "if it is still needed"

remember how the RAF built up a very useful front-line capability of in the '30's of fast, two seat army co-operation aircraft?

When they needed replacement it was done without thinking it through and they bought the Fairey Battle - but times had changed................ You could argue the same about buying the B-58 - the mission was still there but the means of achieving it changed
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 10:12
  #96 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 415 Likes on 218 Posts
Originally Posted by dead_pan
Somehow I doubt it was anything that secret seeing as the Russians would have had a front row seat from their section of ISS...

An experiment maybe? Also they do fly microsatellites from ISS on occasion.
I have no idea but whatever it was, there seemed nothing “micro” about its size - it was almost as bright as the ISS itself and I saw it without a telescope.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 10:59
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,761
Received 2,742 Likes on 1,168 Posts
Asturias56.......... One was thinking Nimrod.


Of course it exists, only a fool...... or the British Government..... would withdraw a strategic asset, if it is still needed, without having a replacement ready to enter service.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 12:39
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 628
Received 192 Likes on 107 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
I have no idea but whatever it was, there seemed nothing “micro” about its size - it was almost as bright as the ISS itself and I saw it without a telescope.
I believe that they occasionally detach a Soyuz to move it from one docking port to another; maybe something like that? Or the highly classified alien spaceship, obviously....
pasta is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 13:27
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/wei...craft-19336512


Davef68 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 15:15
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,761
Received 2,742 Likes on 1,168 Posts
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...act=mrc&uact=8
NutLoose is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.