Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35B down.

Old 28th Sep 2018, 17:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-35B down.

The USMC F-35B has crashed in the US. Status of pilot unknown.
2805662 is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 17:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
An expensive day at the office!
newt is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 17:33
  #3 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,596
Received 275 Likes on 153 Posts
https://www.islandpacket.com/news/lo...219182290.html

Hope the reports of a safe ejection are correct.
treadigraph is online now  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 17:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Greater Aldergrove
Age: 52
Posts: 851
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
https://www.islandpacket.com/news/lo...219182290.html

Hope the reports of a safe ejection are correct.
Indeed, The F35 seemed to have turned a corner recently...hopefully this is only a blip. With any military frame it was bound to happen. And hopefully positive news about the pilot soon.
NWSRG is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 19:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also hoping the reports of a successful ejection are correct.

Best regards to all those who have to use the Martin Baker option - and to this pilot today.

Engines
Engines is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 20:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,833
Received 72 Likes on 28 Posts
Update:
The pilot ejected safely, but was being evaluated for injuries, according to Capt. Bob Bromage, spokesperson for the sheriff’s office.
https://www.islandpacket.com/news/lo...219182290.html
MightyGem is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2018, 22:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
I was hoping the thread title was referring to today’s successful landing-on of a Lightning on the CVF...!
Training Risky is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 00:32
  #8 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,951
Received 856 Likes on 256 Posts
Originally Posted by Training Risky
I was hoping the thread title was referring to today’s successful landing-on of a Lightning on the CVF...!

Pilot ejected, undergoing medical examination but in one piece.
fdr is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 00:33
  #9 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,951
Received 856 Likes on 256 Posts
F-35 crashes for the first time in the jet’s 17-year history, pilot ejects safely

By Paul Sonne

September 28 at 3:35 PM

The U.S. military suffered its first crash of an F-35 aircraft in the 17 year history of the high-profile fighter jet program, the same day the Pentagon announced it had struck a deal with defense contractor Lockheed Martin to drive down costs for the next batch of planes to a historical low.

The crash of the Marine Corps variant of the F-35, known as the F-35B Lightning II, occurred Friday at 11:45 a.m. outside Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort in South Carolina, according to the Marine Corps. The service did not give a suspected cause for the crash, saying the incident remained under investigation.

“The U.S. Marine pilot safely ejected from the single-seat aircraft and is currently being evaluated by medical personnel,” the Marines said in a statement. “There were no civilian injuries.”

The aircraft, which cost more than $100 million, belonged to Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501, which trains Marine pilots for combat with the F-35.

In the past, F-35 jets have made emergency landings, experienced in-flight incidents, including oxygen deprivation among crews, and suffered from engine fires and other failures on the ground. But this is the first time the military has suffered a full-blown crash of an F-35 involving the ejection of a pilot.

A U.S. military official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation remained underway, said the Marine Corps initially classified the crash as a Class A mishap, which is defined as an incident resulting in the complete destruction of the plane, more than $2 million in damage or the fatality or permanent total disability of the crew.

The Pentagon’s deal with Lockheed Martin for 141 fighter jets comes amid persistent controversy over a weapons program that has become the most expensive the Defense Department has ever undertaken.

The most common variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, known as the F-35A, dropped below $90 million per unit for the first time, to $89 million, a 5.4 percent decrease from the previous lot. The price per unit for the Marine Corps and Navy versions dropped to $115 million and $108 million, respectively.

President Trump has pushed Lockheed Martin for lower costs and taken credit for hundreds of millions of dollars in savings, though the F-35 unit price was projected to decrease as the fighter jet transitioned from its development phase into production.

The Pentagon has attributed an increase in aviation accidents to a mix of causes, including years of stopgap funding from Congress, aging equipment, strained maintenance crews and reduced flying hours for pilots.

An investigation by the Military Times earlier this year found that Marine Corps aviation mishaps had jumped 80 percent over the last five years, an increase that came alongside similar trends in the Navy and Air Force.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has vowed to sort out the issues using additional funding the Pentagon has received in the coming year’s $716 billion defense budget. Still, U.S. military officials have cautioned the incidents are the result of a range of issues that will take time to fix.

On Friday, the Marines said they were working with authorities in South Carolina to secure the crash site and guarantee the safety of all personnel in the surrounding area. The service did not give any details about the pilot or what happened ahead of the crash.
fdr is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 09:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdr
F-35 crashes for the first time in the jet’s 17-year history, pilot ejects safely

By Paul Sonne

September 28 at 3:35 PM

The U.S. military suffered its first crash of an F-35 aircraft in the 17 year history of the high-profile fighter jet program, the same day the Pentagon announced it had struck a deal with defense contractor Lockheed Martin to drive down costs for the next batch of planes to a historical low.

The crash of the Marine Corps variant of the F-35, known as the F-35B Lightning II, occurred Friday at 11:45 a.m. outside Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort in South Carolina, according to the Marine Corps. The service did not give a suspected cause for the crash, saying the incident remained under investigation.

“The U.S. Marine pilot safely ejected from the single-seat aircraft and is currently being evaluated by medical personnel,” the Marines said in a statement. “There were no civilian injuries.”

The aircraft, which cost more than $100 million, belonged to Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501, which trains Marine pilots for combat with the F-35.

In the past, F-35 jets have made emergency landings, experienced in-flight incidents, including oxygen deprivation among crews, and suffered from engine fires and other failures on the ground. But this is the first time the military has suffered a full-blown crash of an F-35 involving the ejection of a pilot.

A U.S. military official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation remained underway, said the Marine Corps initially classified the crash as a Class A mishap, which is defined as an incident resulting in the complete destruction of the plane, more than $2 million in damage or the fatality or permanent total disability of the crew.

The Pentagon’s deal with Lockheed Martin for 141 fighter jets comes amid persistent controversy over a weapons program that has become the most expensive the Defense Department has ever undertaken.

The most common variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, known as the F-35A, dropped below $90 million per unit for the first time, to $89 million, a 5.4 percent decrease from the previous lot. The price per unit for the Marine Corps and Navy versions dropped to $115 million and $108 million, respectively.

President Trump has pushed Lockheed Martin for lower costs and taken credit for hundreds of millions of dollars in savings, though the F-35 unit price was projected to decrease as the fighter jet transitioned from its development phase into production.

The Pentagon has attributed an increase in aviation accidents to a mix of causes, including years of stopgap funding from Congress, aging equipment, strained maintenance crews and reduced flying hours for pilots.

An investigation by the Military Times earlier this year found that Marine Corps aviation mishaps had jumped 80 percent over the last five years, an increase that came alongside similar trends in the Navy and Air Force.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has vowed to sort out the issues using additional funding the Pentagon has received in the coming year’s $716 billion defense budget. Still, U.S. military officials have cautioned the incidents are the result of a range of issues that will take time to fix.

On Friday, the Marines said they were working with authorities in South Carolina to secure the crash site and guarantee the safety of all personnel in the surrounding area. The service did not give any details about the pilot or what happened ahead of the crash.
Initially, the Marine Corps was developing its own aircraft to replace the AV-8B Harrier, but in 1994, Congress mandated that the Marine effort be merged with the Air Force/Navy program in order to avoid the higher costs of developing, procuring, and operating and supporting three separate tactical aircraft designs to meet the services’ similar, but not identical, operational needs.

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL30563.pdf

^^^
JSF


So where does 18 +6 = 17?


Hopefully the AAES has operated without detriment to the pilot.

Marham jets grounded yet?


"who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation remained underway"

Quite sinister......unauthorised or just telling porkies ?

Last edited by glad rag; 29th Sep 2018 at 09:19. Reason: Adding congress reference
glad rag is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 11:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be amazed (but accept that I have been amazed before) if someone making an authorised public statement insisted upon anonymity.

Best to the boy or girl with the stiff neck.
orca is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 12:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,578
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
A U.S. military official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation remained underway, said the Marine Corps initially classified the crash as a Class A mishap, which is defined as an incident resulting in the complete destruction of the plane, more than $2 million in damage or the fatality or permanent total disability of the crew.

We're in trouble when flacks demand anonymity when stating the bleeding obvious.
LowObservable is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 13:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 497 Likes on 206 Posts
Let's hope it was not Pilot Error....otherwise that Gyrene has just enlisted for Life if he has to reimburse the Guvmint for the loss.
SASless is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 16:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best regards to all those who have to use the Martin Baker option - and to this pilot today.
I have, but don't the Americans use Aces seats.
dook is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 16:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,853
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Is it only the B variant which has been beset with trouble? If so, I wonder if the RAF will feel more compelled to buy 90 F-35As to complete the order and at a cheaper unit cost!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 17:23
  #16 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
I have, but don't the Americans use Aces seats.
No, all 3 models of the F-35 use a MB seat - though there is a continuous and ongoing campaign by certain parties both within the DoD and US industry get the F-35A to switch over to a modified ACES seat.

The modifications done to the MB seat to remove the pilot weight restrictions and neck injury issues should have put those to rest - but I wouldn’t bank on it.
ORAC is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 17:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
Is it only the B variant which has been beset with trouble? If so, I wonder if the RAF will feel more compelled to buy 90 F-35As to complete the order and at a cheaper unit cost!

FB
You know what caused the loss of this aircraft then?

Please do tell us.
Harley Quinn is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2018, 19:27
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,853
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Harley Quinn
You know what caused the loss of this aircraft then?

Please do tell us.
I've no idea I'm sure you'll be utterly surprised to hear. I simply asked if there was a trend affecting the B and not the other two, it could be a common fault or it could be simple bad luck! That's the extent of my technical knowledge, but you sound like you have far greater insight! Could it be that there is a problem, yet to be determined, affecting the drive shaft for the great rotating dustbin which hoovers up internal capacity and re-shapes the airframe? I don't know.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2018, 08:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
Is it only the B variant which has been beset with trouble? If so, I wonder if the RAF will feel more compelled to buy 90 F-35As to complete the order and at a cheaper unit cost!

FB
F-35As couldn't operate from QNLZ and PWLS so hardly a starter.

Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
I've no idea I'm sure you'll be utterly surprised to hear. I simply asked if there was a trend affecting the B and not the other two, it could be a common fault or it could be simple bad luck! That's the extent of my technical knowledge, but you sound like you have far greater insight! Could it be that there is a problem, yet to be determined, affecting the drive shaft for the great rotating dustbin which hoovers up internal capacity and re-shapes the airframe? I don't know.

FB
Over 320 F-35s have been built to date. So far, they have clocked up more than 130,000 flying hours. One F-35B has now crashed.

F-35B is certainly the most complex version but it seems somewhat premature to ask whether a single crash constitutes being "beset with trouble" or signifies "a trend", especially as we won't know the cause of the crash until it is reported.

To put the F-35B accident rate in perspective, 337 Harrier AV-8Bs have been built and this is its crash record according to Wikipedia:
Accidents

During its service with the USMC, the Harrier has had an accident rate three times that of the Corps' F/A-18s. As of July 2013, approximately 110 aircraft have been damaged beyond repair since the type entered service in 1985,[163] the first accident occurring in March that year.[164] The AV-8 was dubbed a "widow maker" by some in the military.[100] [165] The Los Angeles Times reported in 2003 that the Harrier family had the highest rate of major accidents among military aircraft in service at that time, with 148 accidents and 45 people killed.[166] However, Lon Nordeen notes that several other USMC single-engine strike aircraft, like the A-4 Skyhawk and A-7 Corsair II, had greater accident rates.[167]

Accidents have in particular been connected to the proportionate amount of time the aircraft spends taking off and landing, which are the most critical phases in flight.[100] Further analysis shows that US Marine senior officers never understood the uniqueness of the aircraft, that the Harrier design was more complex, like that of helicopters. Cutbacks in senior maintenance personnel and pilot mistakes had a disastrous effect on the safety of the American-operated AV-8B, which gained it a negative reputation in the US press that was not deserved.[169]
By all accounts, the F-35B is a comparative doddle to land and take off. I'm just relieved that the pilot of the crashed aircraft appears to be unharmed.
FODPlod is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2018, 13:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fod. I think we can all agree that the Harrier wouldn't get off the drawing boards today..

Let's wait and see what the jets capabilities are after the 2023 deliveries commence [providing there are no more slippage to the program ] and see if the RAF decide to drop the B for the longer ranged and vastly more capable A...
glad rag is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.