Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Boeing wins T-X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jun 2021, 07:21
  #21 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,367
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
Here we go again….

p.s. 10 years from first squadron stand-up to FOC? A combat jet with lots of complicated EW and other systems and weapons I can understand, but a trainer?

https://www.airforcemag.com/technica...tion-decision/

Technical Problems Push T-7A Production Decision Back At Least One Year

The Air Force is requesting limited funding for its T-7A Red Hawk next-generation trainer because of technical issues uncovered in testing, which have pushed back the full-rate production decision on the aircraft by at least a year.…..

The Air Force, in a statement, said multiple issues are inhibiting the Red Hawk’s progress toward production. For example, the Milestone C decision, or full-rate production, slipped from 2022 to 2023 because of supplier-side critical parts shortages, initial design delays, and the need for more testing after the “discovery of aircraft wing rock,” which means the T-7 can be unstable in the roll axis when flying at high angles of attack.….

Boeing said in February that the first production aircraft will roll out in early 2022. The first airworthy T-7 will be delivered in 2023, and the first squadron is expected to be operational in 2024, with full operational capability in 2034. The company wants to build up to five deliveries per month, with the Air Force planning to buy 351 T-7As.

The Air Force, in an April acquisition report, said the aircraft had flown more than 250 test sorties, and it was expected to enter Phase 2 of developmental testing in 2021.

ORAC is online now  
Old 17th Jun 2021, 17:01
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Red Hawk?
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2021, 20:39
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
I assume FOC in this case means all the airframes delivered - so the Red Hawk program (rather than the airframe) is delivering at FOC.

Either that or 2034 is a typo!
typerated is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2021, 22:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Arrow

Probably won’t be long before they add a light fighter version with a radar and some weapons fit, drop tanks etc. 🤔
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 25th May 2023, 04:45
  #25 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,367
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
It never rains but it pours for Boeing…..

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2023...-relationship/

GAO blasts T-7 delays, cites ‘tenuous’ Air Force-Boeing relationship

WASHINGTON — Boeing’s effort to build a new trainer aircraft for the Air Force is plagued by safety problems, schedule and testing delays, and the risk the T-7A Red Hawk could fall even further behind schedule, the Government Accountability Office said in a scathing report.

Boeing’s relationship with the Air Force has also been strained by the T-7′s issues, GAO said in the May 18 report, with service officials describing their ties as “tenuous.”….

ORAC is online now  
Old 25th May 2023, 06:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
The aircraft could well have been on schedule and test flying today if the airforce and Boeing had chosen the other seat on offer. Despite improvements with the escape system the delays from the supply chain will no doubt impact delivery severely.
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 25th May 2023, 15:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
nd while the Air Force usually oversees production through its contracting processes, it can't do so because the planes currently being built aren't yet under contract.


What could possibly go wrong.....
Davef68 is offline  
Old 25th May 2023, 20:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
"We are building these aircraft on spec; surely someone will want to buy them ..."
Well, that's what it seems like to me.
(I hope they sort this out, T-38s are getting a bit long in the tooth)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.