Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Miss Velma's engine failure and crash landing at Duxford from the cockpit

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Miss Velma's engine failure and crash landing at Duxford from the cockpit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th May 2018, 07:43
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Northants
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Indeed although not quite 90 off as he wasn’t due south when he made the decision to return. The M11 was an unwelcome complication. Not easy no matter what he chose. Glad he walked away.
Flap62 is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 08:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Part of the issue with emergencies in expensive Warbirds is that there could be a temptation to try and save the aircraft till the bitter end. Consider Gliders on cross country flying. They regularly make safe off-site landings for several reasons. Their landing speed is lower but, they always make a glide approach anyway so their handling skills are practiced. They generally have well considered plans for setting-up and executing a "forced landing", so they use the plan and land safely. I have never seen a Mustang make or practice a glide approach. The usual is a powered approach with a high RPM for engine response. This is the best way to operate them but, any serious loss of power may present the pilot with a scenario he is unable to deal with on approach. Generally, loss of power sufficient to continue normal flight in Piston warbirds would lead to a wheels-up forced landing in the original flying manual and, this is can the safest way if the pilot is trained for it.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 15:37
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onceapilot
<snip>
Consider Gliders on cross country flying. They regularly make safe off-site landings for several reasons. Their landing speed is lower but, they always make a glide approach anyway so their handling skills are practiced.
<snip>
And very importantly gliders despite their fragile appearance are designed to land in fields.
cats_five is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 16:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,245
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
Excellent video and discussion within it. Not sure why posters are discussing the circuit - they were not flying a circuit to land but were positioning for a run in and break, so clearly it would be wider than normal. That’s why he had just moved to echelon starboard.
212man is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 17:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strangely enough, at the same show, there was a mid air between 2 other P-51's (prop strike during a formation change resulting to damage to the tailplane IIRC). This did result in an emergency downwind landed (uneventful).
Treble one is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 18:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cats_five
And very importantly gliders despite their fragile appearance are designed to land in fields.
Yes. Thanks cats. I would add then: "gliders despite their fragile appearance can successfully land in fields"

OAP.
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 20:56
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Northants
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
212man,

If your comment refered to me I didn’t think that the formation were trying to fly a formation circuit. They were obviously positioning for a RIAB (although very early to echelon if they were) when the first power loss occured. This left him with the option of going straight towards finals for the easterly runway with a right base to land downwind or joining (as he did) in a more conventional downwind position for left base to finals with M11 in the undershoot. Wasn’t there so not at all criticising but I think it’s perhaps helpful after videos like this are published to examine the what ifs.
Flap62 is offline  
Old 20th May 2018, 21:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,245
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
Not aimed at you F62 - there were other comments before that seemed to be general in nature about circuit dimension, e.g.

He doesn't seem to mention but I wonder if he did a standard circuit and if so would he have preferred to do a tighter one?
212man is offline  
Old 21st May 2018, 07:55
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,576
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Problem with that scenario is you would then be approaching 90 degrees to the runway with the crowdline on the other side of it.
Not necessarily. He did have more speed/height to play with at this point, which may have allowed him to position for this. Maybe we need to do a "Sully" simulation to see if it was possible....

Have to say he was a very lucky boy - must have come within an ace of digging a wingtip in.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 21st May 2018, 08:23
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
212 - I think you have the wrong end of the stick.

I was talking about the path taken after the Engine trouble started.
typerated is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.