Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

P8 Infrastructure at Lossiemouth

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

P8 Infrastructure at Lossiemouth

Old 23rd Apr 2018, 10:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 505
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Being former Kipper Fleet' I do have some understanding of the environment in which the P8 will operate and the difficulty of maintaining the complex kit' inside the hull. Perhaps the Norwegian P8s' and "Visitors" will also be maintained at Lossie? In which case it begins to make sense'.

A.D.
aw ditor is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 10:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
Was the aircraft wash facility relocated from Kinloss?

Or has it been left so that the pongos can wash their lorries?
BEagle is online now  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 12:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 49 Likes on 18 Posts
I thought Boeing were meant to be building a P-8 logistics and maintenance facility at Boscombe Down?
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 12:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Frozen North
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing Support

Boeing have different military and civic fleets operating which will require different servicing infra, so military 700s will be serviced at Lossie with RW (Apache etc) at BD.
Also the press show Boeing upfronting a LOT of their own money in, so makes sense to build in some ‘non-UK’ P8 capabilility at Lossie AS LONG AS the MOD can find the space...plus would support the UK MOD should they look to provide non-UK crew training...
All the MOD has to do is recruit all those new crews and engineers....I refer to the other threads for that one...
PostMeHappy is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 18:09
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“Aircraft packed with avionics systems...”. Presumably these are located INSIDE the fuselage?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 06:13
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,929
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
Reworked to provide P8 sim. Seriously? I thought we were short of cash! Proposed fleet size doesn’t even begin to justify such a facility.
Oh really? Why would a front-line, multi-role, multi-man, weapons platform not need a simulator? 🙄
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 06:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^

To amplify RP, it does not matter whether your fleet is one aircraft or one hundred; you cannot train maritime crews without a simulator (or for the sake of accuracy, a static "procedures" trainer, which is what the old MCT actually was).

I'm guessing ShotOne does not really understand long-range maritime patrol or he would know this.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 09:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
That’s interesting, all reports state the P-8A will operate from above 10,000ft up to FL300. How much salt spray do you get at 10,000ft?
10,000'?? I suspect there's one too many noughts in that, for a maritime aircraft.
thunderbird7 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 09:23
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it your position, TOFU that discussing the suggestions/demands from this thread: all aircraft hangared due salt enriched environment, reopen Kinross because they need their own airfield, three hangar bays for nine a/c, new-build dedicated admin offices & workshops, is exclusively for those who "understand maritime patrol" ? If this represents current insider thinking it goes some way to explaining why our defence budget doesn't seem to stretch far. If some of this is for training/maintenance shared with other NATO members it begins to make sense but is that the case?

Last edited by ShotOne; 24th Apr 2018 at 10:05.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 09:56
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: avro country
Age: 72
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Old Grey Ladies stood the test of time out on Delta in the salty breezes when I was on 8.
Linedog is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 12:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,799
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
Kinloss?
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
Full of Brown Jobs, I'm afraid.
Another airfield ruined then.
chevvron is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 12:07
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,799
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by A and C
There are a number of reasons for the hangar space needed for the RAF P8 fleet, the aircraft have to operate in a salt rich environment, spend far more time at low level in a high fatigue regime and the aircraft are packed with Avionic systems in the place that Ryanair has seats.

All of this requires far more mainanace per flight hour hence the requirement for what at first glance seemed to be a lot of hangar space for a small fleet.
Nice big hangar at Ballykelly and the brown jobs haven't succeeded in wrecking the entire airfield (yet). The main runway could easily be re-furbished (was re-built from its WW2 layout in about '63 so as to take V-bombers on dispersal) and might even be long enough without using the bit across the railway line.
chevvron is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 15:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,921
Received 137 Likes on 62 Posts
chevvron,

Ballykelly was sold off years ago and has been fully redeveloped.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 16:08
  #34 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,229
Received 1,500 Likes on 678 Posts
Thunderbird7,

No, that figure is correct, for the vast majority of the time the P-8 is supposed to operate no lower than 10,000ft. In fact it’s supposed to spend most of its time up around FL300 using its radar which optimised for that sort of height. It is, supposedly, able to lay sonar buoys accurately from that height.

In order to prosecute submar8ne targets it is to be equipped with a UAV with a MAD which be deployed to prosecute anything detected (no idea how it is recovered).

http://www.militaryaerospace.com/art...ing-drone.html

It also supposed to be equipped with the HAAWC ALA to attack anything it, or it’s UAV, detect.

http://www.militaryaerospace.com/art...g-torpedo.html
ORAC is online now  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 17:05
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Marlow
Age: 76
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The current order for 9 aeroplanes is woefully inadequate. I think 20 is the minimum and then some more before Boeing stop making the P8. Lossie cannot accommodate that many aeroplanes so the St Mawgan facility should be reopened. As far as man power I despair.
I maintain that there should be 45 complete crews for 20 aeroplanes and we are now talking about where they and the supporting ground crew could be basedlet alone where these aeroplanes will be maintained. Waddington? No chance.
Look out for VR Crew as well.
5aday is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 17:09
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are Boeing going to stop making the P8?

It's the only show in town '.......
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 17:38
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Marlow
Age: 76
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Indeed they are. They will resume 737 construction for the airlines once these P8s are built. We have to get in with the order as soon as possible or we wont get more than the current amount of 9.
But somehow the whole thing will be thrown out of the pram - little or insufficient staff
no accommodation, no airfield to base them at, and no funds for the extra aeroplanes.
Work it out - because at the current levels of people involved nobody can take any leave, nobody can man the sims, and the R.A.F. cannot sustain people living in Hotels with all the costs that will take. I can see Kinloss reverting to Blue uniforms again.
5aday is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 17:45
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Marlow
Age: 76
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How many Nimrods do you think we had from Woodford? I think it was about 51 and the powers to be think 9 B737 Poseidon P8s will suffice.
Get a life. It's about time the powers that are supposed to be running this show grew up.
5aday is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 17:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: avro country
Age: 72
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5aday
.
Get a life. It's about time the powers that are supposed to be running this show grew up.
And pay for it with what???
Linedog is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 18:05
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Marlow
Age: 76
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Linedog - of course you are absolutely correct,
The Boeing production of the P8 will finish in 2022. Any increase in orders
has to be done by Q2 2019.
5aday is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.