Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

LM new Fighter - F-22 and F-35 hybrid

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

LM new Fighter - F-22 and F-35 hybrid

Old 21st Apr 2018, 21:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
LM new Fighter - F-22 and F-35 hybrid

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-j...-idUSKBN1HR0MM
typerated is online now  
Old 21st Apr 2018, 22:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds seriously expensive. Can Japan afford this kind of gold plated gear?
etudiant is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2018, 04:33
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,349
Received 1,563 Likes on 710 Posts
A vain punt by LM for the Japanese coproduction contract. the USAF is already looking ahead to the next generation fighter - the Penetrating Counter Air (PCA) fighter with the range and performance to take on China.

With the F-35 in series production it is unlikely that LM would also get the next major contract - particularly with their performance with the F-35 - and Boeing is hungry for something to replace the F-15/F-18.

Boeing's Newest Next-Gen Fighter Concept | Ares

Similarly the USN is also ramping up for the next generation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F/A-XX_Program

Why would the Japanese instead buy into a hybrid of a 40 year design which is proving astronomically expense to upgrade and a 30 year old design bomb truck which is dismally failing to perform and proving so expense to build that even putting the F-22 back into production is starting to look attractive?

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me......
ORAC is online now  
Old 22nd Apr 2018, 06:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,391
Received 179 Likes on 87 Posts
If the US Government was smart, they'd get the Japanese to finance re-opening the F-22 line then get updated F-22s instead of overpriced F-35A's.
So of course that'll never happen...
tdracer is online now  
Old 22nd Apr 2018, 06:54
  #5 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Better still open a new F22/F35 line in Japan and see them delivered on-time, on-budget and fit for purpose.

IG
 
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 02:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, IG. A friend calls them "German-Asians"!
OK4Wire is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 02:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 51 Likes on 32 Posts
Why would the Japanese instead buy into a hybrid of a 40 year design which is proving astronomically expense to upgrade and a 30 year old design bomb truck which is dismally failing to perform and proving so expense to build that even putting the F-22 back into production is starting to look attractive?
Maybe the Japanese are concerned that if they aren’t a plankholder that a USAF lead program will once again be prohibited for export.
West Coast is online now  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 07:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,939
Received 141 Likes on 84 Posts
Pie in the sky?
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 07:47
  #9 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,349
Received 1,563 Likes on 710 Posts
I think autocorrect slightly misspelt your first word.....
ORAC is online now  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 10:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,939
Received 141 Likes on 84 Posts
π⁇


Or they could go in with India and Russia...
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 11:22
  #11 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,349
Received 1,563 Likes on 710 Posts
g............
ORAC is online now  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 11:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,939
Received 141 Likes on 84 Posts
LOL, and pigs will fly.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 12:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,060
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Sounds seriously expensive. Can Japan afford this kind of gold plated gear?


Japan has quite a long history of expensive programs (C-1, F-1, F-2, P-1, US/PS1....) that keep their aviation design and manufacturing programs alive. Over the decades it would have been cheaper to buy off the shelf, but they desired to maintain the jobs and infrastructure. F-2 rumored to be around twice the cost of a F-16.


WHY they want to do this is perhaps another discussion....
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2018, 14:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The concept is not entirely unknown.

The Shah of Iran’s desire to get the latest and greatest resulted in much needed funding for the F-14 which then saw it become the USN Fleet Fighter. This despite Congressional opposition to new technology going overseas.

At the time the Shah had put himself forward as being able to be a stable power in the ME with Britain's retreat. Unfortunate then that he was then hoofed out by radical Islam a short while later.

Does Turkey and the F-35 spring to mind?

Japan one might venture would appear to be a rather more stable ally to the West, is fully committed to the F-35, and is a strategically important ally in that area of the world that has aggressive Chinese expansion.

Could be good.
Brat is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 01:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Skerry
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Shah of Iran’s desire to get the latest and greatest resulted in much needed funding for the F-14 which then saw it become the USN Fleet Fighter.

Errr... do you have any evidence for a causal connection between Iranian interest and the funding of the USN program. Like, actual evidence.
George K Lee is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 04:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
https://warisboring.com/why-iran-rea...-f-14-tomcats/
How F-14 Purchase from US Humiliated Iran?s Monarchy
https://case.hks.harvard.edu/on-the-...buys-the-f-14/
Fact: Iran's Air Force Flies American-Made F-14 Tomcats | The National Interest Blog

Have a read - some contradictory stuff


Incidentally a couple of years ago I stayed at a house in Isfahan that had originally been part of the complex for US staff at the Bell factory

This complex I guess it was: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...=.849f573a8d8b

My Iranian friend had been moved there when the US moved out - they got bombed during the iraq/Iran war - he was only 5 then & his well-connected father had him smuggled out - to India.

Last edited by Load Toad; 24th Apr 2018 at 04:58.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 14:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is an F-22/F-35 hybrid anyway? How does one "combine" the features of a two-engine stealth air superiority fighter with a single-engine stealth attack aircraft? Will the resulting hybrid have 1.5 engines? And which version of the F-35 will they hybridize? The A, B, or C?

Maybe they could scale up the "big wing" F-35C and put two engines in it. Something like that would likely have a large internal weapons bay, huge volume for fuel, and could have excellent stealth. And if they tweeked the aerodynamics, probably have long range super cruise capability
KenV is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 15:16
  #18 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,349
Received 1,563 Likes on 710 Posts
Easier, and better, to start with a clean sheet of paper and design an aircraft around modern engines and avionics - with an open architecture - to meet the required specifications.
ORAC is online now  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 15:17
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,939
Received 141 Likes on 84 Posts
KenV, erm... F-28.5?
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2018, 16:07
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Easier, and better, to start with a clean sheet of paper and design an aircraft around modern engines and avionics - with an open architecture - to meet the required specifications.
Maybe. Maybe not. USN scaled up the classic Hornet to get the Super Hornet and it looks like they're going to keep improving the Super Hornet and keep it in production for another decade or so. And the B-21 by all reports appears to be a down scale of the original B-2 bomber design. (By original I mean the design Northrup came up with decades ago as a high altitude penetrator and then USAF bastardized to give it a low altitude penetration capability.) So clearly there's much to be said for using a mature, known design over an all new clean sheet design. And you don't need a clean sheet aircraft design to use the most modern engine technology available. The same goes with avionics. A mature airframe design can employ both a leading edge engine design as well as leading edge avionics.

And perhaps the best argument for using a mature airframe design is production. The biggest headache in any new aircraft design is maturing the production systems, including all the suppliers.
KenV is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.