Vulcan B2?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vulcan B2?
Hello All
How many hours could a Vulcan B2 fly without been refuelled in midair or on the ground, and what was the longest sortie without been refuelled flown if known?
Glider 90
How many hours could a Vulcan B2 fly without been refuelled in midair or on the ground, and what was the longest sortie without been refuelled flown if known?
Glider 90
*'being' not 'been'
Sorry its one of my bugbears.
Sorry its one of my bugbears.
There is a theoretical distance but your question needs to specify, weight, height flown, weather/air conditions, if it was carrying anything hanging underneath and probably several other parameters as well.
With respect the answer to your question will be meaningless unless you are more specific.
Old Duffer
With respect the answer to your question will be meaningless unless you are more specific.
Old Duffer
You'll find an answer by using Google to search
To make it "easier" for you, Wiki has
The last B.2 XM657 was delivered in 1965 and the type served till 1984. Whilst in service the B.2 was continuously updated with modifications including rapid engine starting, bomb-bay fuel tanks, wing strengthening to give the fatigue life to enable the aircraft to fly at low level (a tactic introduced in the mid-1960s), upgraded navigation equipment, terrain following radar (TFR), standardisation on a common nuclear weapon (WE.117) and improved ECM equipment.[49] The B.1As were not strengthened, thus all were withdrawn by 1968.[50] Nine B.2s were modified for a maritime radar reconnaissance (MRR) role[51] and six for an airborne tanker role.[52] An updated bomb rack assembly allowed the carriage of 30 1,000lb bombs, up from 21[53] and the updated wing profile increased range to 4,000nm (7,400km).[54]
To make it "easier" for you, Wiki has
The last B.2 XM657 was delivered in 1965 and the type served till 1984. Whilst in service the B.2 was continuously updated with modifications including rapid engine starting, bomb-bay fuel tanks, wing strengthening to give the fatigue life to enable the aircraft to fly at low level (a tactic introduced in the mid-1960s), upgraded navigation equipment, terrain following radar (TFR), standardisation on a common nuclear weapon (WE.117) and improved ECM equipment.[49] The B.1As were not strengthened, thus all were withdrawn by 1968.[50] Nine B.2s were modified for a maritime radar reconnaissance (MRR) role[51] and six for an airborne tanker role.[52] An updated bomb rack assembly allowed the carriage of 30 1,000lb bombs, up from 21[53] and the updated wing profile increased range to 4,000nm (7,400km).[54]
With 98% +16, probably a tadge over 7 hr if you really wanted to. Back in 1978 at Sunny Scampton, the 617th Dead Dog Mob and the 27th Geriatric Boat Spotters competed to fly the longest Vulcan sortie... Whereas 'Sweaters', our boss, told us that he'd personally kick the ar$es of any 35 Sqn crew to waste flying time on any such stupidity.
Good man!
Good man!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Old Duffer
"Sir" with not "being" a Vulcan pilot I would not know the all upweight for take off and weather conditions etc, it was just a general question to pass away the time while "being" stuck in the snow!
"Sir" with not "being" a Vulcan pilot I would not know the all upweight for take off and weather conditions etc, it was just a general question to pass away the time while "being" stuck in the snow!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GLIDER90
Firstly, I may be wrong, but my reading of Old Duffers post was not one of sarcasm or of trying to be unhelpful- merely pointing out that there is never one simple answer to such a simple question.
Again, in Old Duffers defence (not that he needs me to fight his battles) it wasn’t him who commented on the Been and Being issue either.
Grammar- the difference between knowing your **** and knowing you’re ****.
Firstly, I may be wrong, but my reading of Old Duffers post was not one of sarcasm or of trying to be unhelpful- merely pointing out that there is never one simple answer to such a simple question.
Again, in Old Duffers defence (not that he needs me to fight his battles) it wasn’t him who commented on the Been and Being issue either.
Grammar- the difference between knowing your **** and knowing you’re ****.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Duchess Driver
Steady on Duchess! I was not having a go at Old Duffer it was just a general question that's all, as regards " being" I think you miss understood in what I was meaning regarding "Turin" comment.
Steady on Duchess! I was not having a go at Old Duffer it was just a general question that's all, as regards " being" I think you miss understood in what I was meaning regarding "Turin" comment.
You'll find an answer by using Google to search
To make it "easier" for you, Wiki has
The last B.2 XM657 was delivered in 1965 and the type served till 1984. Whilst in service the B.2 was continuously updated with modifications including rapid engine starting, bomb-bay fuel tanks, wing strengthening to give the fatigue life to enable the aircraft to fly at low level (a tactic introduced in the mid-1960s), upgraded navigation equipment, terrain following radar (TFR), standardisation on a common nuclear weapon (WE.117) and improved ECM equipment.[49] The B.1As were not strengthened, thus all were withdrawn by 1968.[50] Nine B.2s were modified for a maritime radar reconnaissance (MRR) role[51] and six for an airborne tanker role.[52] An updated bomb rack assembly allowed the carriage of 30 1,000lb bombs, up from 21[53] and the updated wing profile increased range to 4,000nm (7,400km).[54]
To make it "easier" for you, Wiki has
The last B.2 XM657 was delivered in 1965 and the type served till 1984. Whilst in service the B.2 was continuously updated with modifications including rapid engine starting, bomb-bay fuel tanks, wing strengthening to give the fatigue life to enable the aircraft to fly at low level (a tactic introduced in the mid-1960s), upgraded navigation equipment, terrain following radar (TFR), standardisation on a common nuclear weapon (WE.117) and improved ECM equipment.[49] The B.1As were not strengthened, thus all were withdrawn by 1968.[50] Nine B.2s were modified for a maritime radar reconnaissance (MRR) role[51] and six for an airborne tanker role.[52] An updated bomb rack assembly allowed the carriage of 30 1,000lb bombs, up from 21[53] and the updated wing profile increased range to 4,000nm (7,400km).[54]
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Back in Blighty
Age: 73
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree with Timelord.
Long duration would entirely depend on how much was in the bomb bay and what the minmum landing fuel for diversion was that day. Longest in my log book was 6 hours 30 minutes, which felt far too long. Cruise climb technique wouls have got a bit more.
Long duration would entirely depend on how much was in the bomb bay and what the minmum landing fuel for diversion was that day. Longest in my log book was 6 hours 30 minutes, which felt far too long. Cruise climb technique wouls have got a bit more.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
There was a GroupEx in 1967 when alternative aircraft in the stream were diverted from UK to Akrotiri and required to bomb El Adem range outbound. The following day they were ordered to repeat the exercise bombing El Adem before heading home. I wasn't on this exercise but think homebound 6.45 due to headwinds and they were very much on minimums. The distance is about 2400 nm.
My longest sortie was a hilohi, 5.45, which included a primary nav leg about one hour, a 360 mile low level, 1.30, and a high level secondary navex about 2 hrs. We had to make straight in approach to Pershore from high level over the Lake District. We landed just below minimums.
Both these instances were without internal bomb bay fuel.
Another time a crew calculation they could fly home from Chicago but permission was denied.
The much quoted 4000 mile unrefuelled range would have equated to about 8 hrs 40 min and that was in the same ball park as the supersonic Jaguar.
I think the Mk 1 had a much greater range, much lighter airframe, lower powered engines with lower fuel consumption. The very powerful 301 engines were optimized to lift two Skybolt missiles to 50,000 feet plus. They were least suitable for low level missions.
My longest sortie was a hilohi, 5.45, which included a primary nav leg about one hour, a 360 mile low level, 1.30, and a high level secondary navex about 2 hrs. We had to make straight in approach to Pershore from high level over the Lake District. We landed just below minimums.
Both these instances were without internal bomb bay fuel.
Another time a crew calculation they could fly home from Chicago but permission was denied.
The much quoted 4000 mile unrefuelled range would have equated to about 8 hrs 40 min and that was in the same ball park as the supersonic Jaguar.
I think the Mk 1 had a much greater range, much lighter airframe, lower powered engines with lower fuel consumption. The very powerful 301 engines were optimized to lift two Skybolt missiles to 50,000 feet plus. They were least suitable for low level missions.
Last edited by Pontius Navigator; 2nd Mar 2018 at 17:41.
As a spotty young rigger on E Dispersal, Scampton 1965, my recollection is the B2's (Blue Steel) would be seen-off to disappear into the wide, not very blue yonder only to reappear some five hours later and interrupt our bridge (or Uckers) pastime. 
