Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Electromagnetic guns should be fitted on China’s new destroyer

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Electromagnetic guns should be fitted on China’s new destroyer

Old 5th Feb 2018, 12:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geordieland
Posts: 91
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Electromagnetic guns should be fitted on China’s new destroyer

Headline in China's "Global Times".

This is a state sponsored newspaper I know; bur could someone elaborate on the subject of electromagnetic guns?
Prawn2king4 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 13:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,553
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts
There may well be a mistranslation from the Chinese for Electronic Countermeasures?
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 13:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Nope, they're talking about rail guns or coil guns.

In this particular instance its a rail gun. Recent coverage from Chinese defence observers show that they have fitted one to an LPD ship for trials on its next mission out to the contested islands.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 13:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO, fitting a rail gun on a ship does not mean much. Could well be just a prototype that will then be garbaged.
Even if it is not entirely a hot air balloon, the question is how long will it take to become a real weapon.

I recall that USN and industry experimented with such a facility but it has not advanced yet beyond prototyping. Though current ships like Zumwalt can generate enough megawatts of power, the question is how many shots per min can be produced and how much capacitors will cost (not only in terms of money, but space, weight, maintainability, etc.).
A_Van is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 14:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Yes, the problem is rounds per minute and how many minutes you get per barrel.

A problem of metallurgy.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 14:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Having read a recent paper,the biggest stumbling block would appear to be the size of the extension lead.
woptb is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 16:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Southport
Posts: 1,333
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
They have a nasty habit of destroying themselves, but if they can get it to work it's a fame changer, no nasty explosives to carry around and a shell that goes Mach 5 is impossible to defend against with current technology. It's a very very big if though.....
Think the Zumwalt is a bit different, it uses fancy hybrid shell/missile technology which is why the rounds cost $800k each, and since they're not building many more ships the supply of said rounds has dried up.
andytug is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 17:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by andytug
They have a nasty habit of destroying themselves, but if they can get it to work it's a fame changer, no nasty explosives to carry around and a shell that goes Mach 5 is impossible to defend against with current technology. It's a very very big if though.....
Think the Zumwalt is a bit different, it uses fancy hybrid shell/missile technology which is why the rounds cost $800k each, and since they're not building many more ships the supply of said rounds has dried up.

Well, as ever, part of the massive cost per round was the fact that they'd produce less of the rounds. I'd think laser terminal guidance would be useful for rounds like that but, accelerating to such huge speeds in short distances just kills anything mechanical so steering is always going to be hard work.

I had read that the US rail gun was shelved for cost savings.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/02/photos-show-china-preparing-to-test-naval-railgun/
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 20:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 192
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by andytug
They have a nasty habit of destroying themselves, but if they can get it to work it's a fame changer, no nasty explosives to carry around and a shell that goes Mach 5 is impossible to defend against with current technology. It's a very very big if though.....
Think the Zumwalt is a bit different, it uses fancy hybrid shell/missile technology which is why the rounds cost $800k each, and since they're not building many more ships the supply of said rounds has dried up.
You are confusing the DDG 1000 155mm gun and a rail gun. two completely different things. The 155mm is a guided munition but because the class buy went from 32 down to 3 hulls munitions have become extremely expensive. It is not widely known, but BAE is responsible for the 155mm.
The rail gun is about to get fitted to a littoral support ship for trials and yes, Zimwalt has plenty of Megawatts available from the 4 RR engines.
1771 DELETE is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2018, 21:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Hypersonic wave riders.
Rail guns.
Each time I read one of these stories about the middle kingdom's progress in developing these things - I remind myself - let's see the live fire demonstration and lets see it reliably repeated.
Then I'll be worried.
tartare is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.