RAF to scrap twin-seat Typhoons
Join Date: May 2007
Location: upstairs
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EAP
PS as an aside to all, my Google lookup defines 'stochastic' as "having a random probability distribution or pattern that may be analysed statistically but may not be predicted precisely" which works quite well for me.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a point of interest does anyone have an explanation as to why the French Air Force seem to have a roughly equal force of single and two seat Rafales?
I am assuming that the answer is not just the nuclear role as the Naval single seaters are nuclear capable.
I am assuming that the answer is not just the nuclear role as the Naval single seaters are nuclear capable.
Short sighted conservatism?
We will need to un-stick a few potential poo traps but it all depends on the flash-to bang time and fudge factor allowed. Things may end up slipping to the left and, if they do, we will need to run a tight ship. I don't want to reinvent the wheel but we must get right into the weeds on this one. If push comes to shove, we may have to up-stumps and then we'll be in a whole new ball game.
I suggest we test the water with a few warmers in the bank. If we can produce the goods then we are cooking with gas. If not, then we are in a world of hurt. I don't want to die in a ditch over it but we could easily end up in a flat spin if people start getting twitchy.
To that end, I want to get around the bazaars and make sure the movers and shakers are on-side from day one. If you can hit me with your shopping list I can take it to the head honchos and start the ball rolling. I know you're not the sharpest tool in the box and may be a few sandwiches short of a picnic, but together we'll be the best thing since sliced bread.
There is light at the end of the tunnel and I think we have backed a winner here. If it gets blown out of the water, however, I will be throwing a track. So get your feet into my in-tray and give me chapter and verse as to how you see things panning out. As long as our ducks are in a row I think the ball will stay in play and we can come up smelling of roses.
Before you bomb-burst and throw smoke it is imperative we nail our colours to the mast and look at the big picture. We've got to march to the beat of the drum. We are on a sticky wicket, we'll need to play with a straight bat and watch out for fast balls.
I've been on permanent send for long enough and I've had my ten pence worth. I don't want to rock the boat or teach anyone to suck eggs. We must keep this firmly in our sight picture and not under our hats or it will fall between the cracks. If the cap fits, wear it, but it may seem like pushing fog uphill with a sharp stick. Did you all get that?
Two-seat Rafales? Wikipedia is your friend:
Slightly sloppy language in that quote. As has been pointed out the ‘strike’ (nuclear) role can be carried out by a single-seat Rafale; that’s because the targets are (hopefully!) rigorously pre-planned and tend not to move. It’s dynamic conventional missions such as armed recce and interdiction which increase the challenge for a single pilot.
Remember that Typhoon was treated as a ‘pure’ fighter during its development, so the logic invoked by the FAF would not have applied despite the design decisions being taken in a similar timeframe. Back in those days the assumption was that Tornado would be replaced by something else, so if Typhoon grew into attack roles it would be only as a Jaguar (and possibly Harrier) replacement. Fast forward to F35 development, and improvements in sensor and computing technology saw ‘sensor fusion’ finally displace the second crew member for all mission types. This rather begs the question of Typhoon’s current suitability for the full range of air-to-ground missions, having neither the designed-in sensor fusion of the F35 nor the flexible computing power of a second brain. An upgrade from Litening III will probably be needed to ease the pilot’s task while tracking moving targets, which will need to be done very accurately if Typhoon is to be able to replicate Tornado’s Brimstone capability.
We’ll be unlikely to find out whether sensor fusion is sufficiently mature for F35 to have dispensed with a WSO until the type’s first combat results hit the media. No pilot is going to confess publicly to finding targeting a bit tricky! In the meantime, I was intrigued to see on a recent thread a French-German concept drawing of a stealthy combat aircraft... with two seats!
Initially, the Rafale B was to be just a trainer, but the Gulf War showed that a second crew member was invaluable on strike and reconnaissance missions. Therefore, in 1991 the Air Force switched its preferences towards the two-seater, announcing that the variant would constitute 60 percent of the Rafale fleet
Remember that Typhoon was treated as a ‘pure’ fighter during its development, so the logic invoked by the FAF would not have applied despite the design decisions being taken in a similar timeframe. Back in those days the assumption was that Tornado would be replaced by something else, so if Typhoon grew into attack roles it would be only as a Jaguar (and possibly Harrier) replacement. Fast forward to F35 development, and improvements in sensor and computing technology saw ‘sensor fusion’ finally displace the second crew member for all mission types. This rather begs the question of Typhoon’s current suitability for the full range of air-to-ground missions, having neither the designed-in sensor fusion of the F35 nor the flexible computing power of a second brain. An upgrade from Litening III will probably be needed to ease the pilot’s task while tracking moving targets, which will need to be done very accurately if Typhoon is to be able to replicate Tornado’s Brimstone capability.
We’ll be unlikely to find out whether sensor fusion is sufficiently mature for F35 to have dispensed with a WSO until the type’s first combat results hit the media. No pilot is going to confess publicly to finding targeting a bit tricky! In the meantime, I was intrigued to see on a recent thread a French-German concept drawing of a stealthy combat aircraft... with two seats!
Last edited by Easy Street; 1st Feb 2018 at 20:53.
There were no 2 seat F117s or F22s were there?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2 Seats vice 1 Seat
The FAF operate their Rafales very, very well indeed. Their MC will more often than not be found sitting in one of the back seats, running the mission without having to try and lead his four ship.
Equally, the Super Hornets thoroughly embarrassed the Typhoon guys out on exercise recently, not least down to the flexibility that 2 seats offer. Pilot in the front concentrating on the air picture whilst the guy is able to prosecute ground targets at the same time. They are significantly better at multirole than Typhoon is.
Sensor fusion is much improved now and both F22 and F35 probably take away the need for a guy in the back but, I think Typhoon could have done with someone in the back on multirole stuff. I’m sure the Typhoon mates will disagree!!
Equally, the Super Hornets thoroughly embarrassed the Typhoon guys out on exercise recently, not least down to the flexibility that 2 seats offer. Pilot in the front concentrating on the air picture whilst the guy is able to prosecute ground targets at the same time. They are significantly better at multirole than Typhoon is.
Sensor fusion is much improved now and both F22 and F35 probably take away the need for a guy in the back but, I think Typhoon could have done with someone in the back on multirole stuff. I’m sure the Typhoon mates will disagree!!
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flash to bang time is actually quite important if you are walking away from a blind having lit the safety fuse. And you would be surprised at how useful the stochastic modelling of explosive sensitivity is.
However, mentioning such things on this forum is never that wise as it introduces the concept that other people know clever stuff- and a small element of the 2 -winged master race just can't handle that.
The FAF operate their Rafales very, very well indeed. Their MC will more often than not be found sitting in one of the back seats, running the mission without having to try and lead his four ship.
Equally, the Super Hornets thoroughly embarrassed the Typhoon guys out on exercise recently, not least down to the flexibility that 2 seats offer. Pilot in the front concentrating on the air picture whilst the guy is able to prosecute ground targets at the same time. They are significantly better at multirole than Typhoon is.
Sensor fusion is much improved now and both F22 and F35 probably take away the need for a guy in the back but, I think Typhoon could have done with someone in the back on multirole stuff. I’m sure the Typhoon mates will disagree!!
Equally, the Super Hornets thoroughly embarrassed the Typhoon guys out on exercise recently, not least down to the flexibility that 2 seats offer. Pilot in the front concentrating on the air picture whilst the guy is able to prosecute ground targets at the same time. They are significantly better at multirole than Typhoon is.
Sensor fusion is much improved now and both F22 and F35 probably take away the need for a guy in the back but, I think Typhoon could have done with someone in the back on multirole stuff. I’m sure the Typhoon mates will disagree!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
Interesting that so much jeering was triggered by a single use of the word "stochastic", yet no one commented on the clearly B/S use of "Sensor fusion" in respect to Typhoons. I went over to the hangar and checked - none of the sensors are fused to anything, and none of them are driven by (or in any way connected to) fusion reactors.
PDR
PDR
Interesting that so much jeering was triggered by a single use of the word "stochastic", yet no one commented on the clearly B/S use of "Sensor fusion" in respect to Typhoons. I went over to the hangar and checked - none of the sensors are fused to anything, and none of them are driven by (or in any way connected to) fusion reactors.
PDR
PDR