Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Defence support contractor Carillion fighting to stay afloat

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Defence support contractor Carillion fighting to stay afloat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2018, 15:41
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,769
Received 2,762 Likes on 1,173 Posts
A Commons committee has announced it will hold an inquiry into government outsourcing following the demise of Carillion.

Bernard Jenkin, chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, said it would look at the "lessons to be learned from the collapse".

It will also look at wider issues in Whitehall around public procurement, IT and the relationship with non-public sector bodies.
In an ideal world these turkeys would find themselves standing outside the building in the freezing rain because the contractor servicing parliament had just gone bust.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 15th Jan 2018, 15:43
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Robert Peston is quoted as saying:"

You would have thought he'd learned his lesson


Hint.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/new...-swearing.html
glad rag is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2018, 16:30
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I always thought Peston's rant about Northern Rock had a lot to do with precipitating the financial crisis
Wander00 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2018, 18:12
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Up
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cazalet33 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 12:19
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,769
Received 2,762 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Originally Posted by Melchett01
Well the cleaning staff in my Mess don’t appear to have been around today. Interesting to see if it’s a one off and things settle down with the Govt line that public service contracts will keep running or whether that’s it despite Govt assurances.
No problem....Ok this thing is called a Hoover, you plug one end into the wall and move the other end around the carpets...


NutLoose is online now  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 14:13
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
For all those banging on about this being the end of PFi deals and public sector outsourcing, you need to look at Carillion's last published accounts. The PFO and public sector contracts are all fine, heathy and very profitable.
It is on the construction side that they have made huge losses, they are the UK's second largest construction company, and it is here that they have got it disastrously wrong.

The PFI and public sector deals will be easy for the liquidator to sell on.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 14:37
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Up
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice!

Cazalet33 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 14:49
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
For the CEO of the second largest construction company in the UK that is hardly excessive.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 14:52
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Up
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For a CEO of a company which was run into the ground by himself and his cohorts, it's massively excessive!

We've seen it before. Remember RBS?
Cazalet33 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 14:53
  #70 (permalink)  
Olympia 463
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Carillion

Originally Posted by pr00ne
For all those banging on about this being the end of PFi deals and public sector outsourcing, you need to look at Carillion's last published accounts. The PFO and public sector contracts are all fine, heathy and very profitable.
It is on the construction side that they have made huge losses, they are the UK's second largest construction company, and it is here that they have got it disastrously wrong.

The PFI and public sector deals will be easy for the liquidator to sell on.
That's all very well, and at the end of the day the good bits will be passed on. However the whole firm is at a standstill and will not be paying wages so one hopes that the hapless workers have a month or two's salary stashed away. I was lucky when I got thrown on the scrapheap when my employer went into liquidation. The liquidator had a few jobs which if finished would bring in some cash. I had been a chief designer, but I worked for six weeks as a contract draughtsman while I found another job.
 
Old 16th Jan 2018, 15:28
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: No longer a hot and sandy place....but back to the UK for an indefinite period
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basic Contract Management Rule No 1:- Never award a major contract without performing due diligence on the Contractor.

This has clearly never been undertaken. The serious issues with Carillion have been known about for some time.
Boy_From_Brazil is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 21:28
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,247
Received 630 Likes on 227 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne
For the CEO of the second largest construction company in the UK that is hardly excessive.
It is excessive if he cocks up.

Clearly somebody upcocked. "The buck stops here"
langleybaston is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 22:10
  #73 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne
For all those banging on about this being the end of PFi deals and public sector outsourcing, you need to look at Carillion's last published accounts. The PFO and public sector contracts are all fine, heathy and very profitable.
It is on the construction side that they have made huge losses, they are the UK's second largest construction company, and it is here that they have got it disastrously wrong.

The PFI and public sector deals will be easy for the liquidator to sell on.
I’m not entirely convinced by that, I think it will certainly intensify the debate about public/private sector outsourcing and relations. And the Tories are not in much of a position to weather another storm right now, especially if the effects spread into the extended supply chain thus exacerbating ‘contagion’ amongst the electorate. I’m politically incoherent in terms of who I support, and although my tendency is to the right in this case I think JC has raised a valid point that needs at least considering.

As for the accounts being healthy for their public sector work, that makes no odds, you have to look at the totality of the accounts to say a company is healthy. As it is, it looks as though Carillion’s finance department had been engaged in all sorts of schemes - legal I should add - to mask the dire state of their cash flow such as rising debt levels which didn’t feature in the main debt numbers on the balance sheet and mixing financing and operating cash flows. It was all there if you did the requisite due diligence, going back a good few years. Some of it apparently due to unhappy customers not paying up after bodged jobs. But in all, a very good example of why cash is king in the business world - for all their multi-billion contracts they simply didn’t have sufficient cash to keep the lights on. And when that became apparent valuations went into free fall and it was only a matter of time.

And whilst the public sector contracts will likely be sold on, it won’t be a good deal for the public purse, as I suggested right at the start, most sensible firms will see they have us over a barrel.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2018, 22:23
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,769
Received 2,762 Likes on 1,173 Posts
IT was some of the support companies featured on the news I feel really sorry for as they have already started to let staff go as they are owed a small fortune, one company was owed £1,000,000 in unpaid work.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 17th Jan 2018, 07:28
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,320
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
An interesting point was made by Vince Cable on the radio yesterday - the Govt don't have specialist contract negotiators/writers (I believe we used to once upon a time) - the French have an academy for that specialisation, properly trained people with experience in due diligence and finance.

As a country we still haven't learned the warning about 'not putting all your eggs in one basket' and continue to believe that economies of scale work, both militarily or financially - that is how you create behemoths that are 'too big to fail'.

Couple that with a desire from both major parties to move things off the treasury balance sheet - welcome the PFI fiasco - and it's no surprise we have ended up here.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2018, 08:38
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
the Govt don't have specialist contract negotiators/writers (I believe we used to once upon a time)
In MoD this may have gone full circle. Commercial staff are encouraged to gain professional qualifications, although how they compare to industry professionals I don't know.

Setting this aside, there are two sure-fire ways to a successfully and timely contract being awarded. One, get the company to draft it. Most delays are caused by Commercial faffing around for months over terms and conditions, trying to get the company to accept unsuitable ones. It ain't a contract until MoD agrees it is, so there can never be any harm caused. Two, the technical project manager negotiates and agrees the contract, as used to be the case with anything airworthiness or repair related. Commercial don't like this as they are taught, wrongly, only they can sign a contract. Read the regs and get over it. Underpinning this, make sure the Schedule of Requirements reflects what the Service really needs and what is possible; which seldom aligns with what DEC asks for. Downside - to achieve this you need experienced, trained technical staff. Otherwise, it's straight forward.

But none of this counts for anything if you get a political over-rule, to let the contract on a company who didn't bid, who happen to be in a Defence Minister's constituency. Perhaps not a million miles from the Carillion problem.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2018, 09:16
  #77 (permalink)  
Olympia 463
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sometimes politics over rules sensible debate. I left a company in the defence industry when the technical director and sales chief decided not to accept my estimate of how many man years of work would be needed to design a new tank sight. I was Chief Designer and had been hired in to buck up their design department. I had already won the contract for the image intensified night sight for the SA80 rifle for them and introduced new more efficient working practices in the design area. They over ruled me and went ahead using a lower figure which I knew could not be achieved in order to undercut our oppositon. Money was lost, the parent company sold the outfit to the French (not long after I left) and all the culprits lost their jobs.

Earlier in my career I worked for a very large blue chip company in the heavy electrical business. They had a whole department whose job it was to work how long they could delay paying their sub contractors before legal action was on the cards.

Sounds like Carillion had both these things going on.
 
Old 17th Jan 2018, 10:51
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As a mere Chartered Management Accountant, our wonder what our auditing cousins were doing for the last few years
Wander00 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2018, 11:05
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
It is excessive if he cocks up.

Clearly somebody upcocked. "The buck stops here"
As I understand it the current CEO was brought in last year to try to turn things around after the company got into difficulties during the time under his predecessor. Simplistic jeering about "upcocking" may not be appropriate, but it does play to the crowd.

Throw in a few knob gags while you're at it and you'll get yourself an audience.

It will be an ignorant, brainless audience, but still an audience...

PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2018, 11:51
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
IT was some of the support companies featured on the news I feel really sorry for as they have already started to let staff go as they are owed a small fortune, one company was owed £1,000,000 in unpaid work.
By that stage alarm bells should have been deafening ..
glad rag is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.