Do you believe Mrs May?
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a more serious note, I wonder how many 22 year olds did fly it. I would imagine that you would have to be an 18 year old entrant on O or A levels to manage that. I think that even back in the 80's, most fast jet starters were university graduates joining up as 22 year olds so by the time they had done basic and advanced training, they would be about 24/25 before they got near a Tornado cockpit. I wonder when the last "5 O level" pilot/nav was recruited from new?
Do you believe Mrs May?
........well no!
But then we are in an awfull situation with our politics at the moment.
An inbred culture of lying & deceit has taken over, probably brought about by all the hangers on, spin docters etc constantly trying to make everything look good and bury bad news.
Everything that is said or written is carefully crafted to look like one thing, but mean something else.
Shades of the Emperors New Clothes?
But then we are in an awfull situation with our politics at the moment.
An inbred culture of lying & deceit has taken over, probably brought about by all the hangers on, spin docters etc constantly trying to make everything look good and bury bad news.
Everything that is said or written is carefully crafted to look like one thing, but mean something else.
Shades of the Emperors New Clothes?
Yebbut you didn't manage to fly the one in the photo (GR1)
PS. On reflection it looks like Prototype (P08)
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
The days of service personnel being default Tory supporters are long gone, given that they have repeatedly proved (through their reckless attacks on the budget of the Armed Forces) that their claim of being the party of 'security' is nothing but talk.
Some may consider the prospect of Left-leaning government distasteful, due to their less war-mongering rhetoric, but at least the Left are likely to do as they say, not BS about being "strong on defence" whilst hacking the services to pieces.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Maybe the requirement for A Levels came in with the move to Cranwell-only training for offrs.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sneaking up on the Runway and leaping out to grab it unawares
Age: 61
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I joined in 1975 it was min 5 O levels for officer aircrew and 3 O levels for NCO air eng, loadmaster etc. However at seventeen and a half, with 6 O Levels, I enquired about NCO air eng but was "persuaded" by the CIO to go for propulsion tech with a view to remustering to air eng later on. It was probably the right decision as I wasn't mature enough as a 17.5 year old and I'm sure I would have flunked the course.
The days of service personnel being default Tory supporters are long gone, given that they have repeatedly proved (through their reckless attacks on the budget of the Armed Forces) that their claim of being the party of 'security' is nothing but talk.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Roadster, the clue in my post was Henlow. In 61 Cranwell was exclusively aircrew and mostly pilot at that. Cranwell was essential if you expected promotion to sqn ldr and beyond. It was possible to be promoted to sqn ldr whilst on the Supplementary List with the bonus that passing the C was not required. However for promotion to flt lt it was essential that one passed the B. It was noit unusual to find fg off with 12 years seniority in rank. They enjoyed the almost total lack of power or authority.
"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
1969, with the introduction of the Military Salary, and the combining of the lists. I was 22 and married. No entitlement to married quarters, and a VERY reduced marriage allowance. Suddenly an increase in pay, and a quarter. Oh, and a third of a batwoman to help my wife out (that didn't last long, though).
Roadster, the clue in my post was Henlow. In 61 Cranwell was exclusively aircrew and mostly pilot at that. Cranwell was essential if you expected promotion to sqn ldr and beyond. It was possible to be promoted to sqn ldr whilst on the Supplementary List with the bonus that passing the C was not required. However for promotion to flt lt it was essential that one passed the B. It was noit unusual to find fg off with 12 years seniority in rank. They enjoyed the almost total lack of power or authority.
(Was that punctuation correct?)
I prescribe to the talk is cheap theory for politicians and therefore tend not to believe any politician's protestations of support for whoever they claim to back. As a PC I see the Tories cutting police budgets whilst increasing the penalties for a range of offences and telling everyone how tough they are on x y and z. The trouble is an increase in penalties is cheap but the real cost comes with having enough people to enforce the laws no matter how tough the penalty. In the meantime the government gets lots of column inches about how tough they are at no cost. The same principle applies to May and her fine words about the armed forces. She talks about how much she values them but she isn't prepared to back up those fine words with an inflation matching or inflation plus pay rise for example. The veterans card is a fine gesture but it won't cost the government a penny as the people giving the discounts linked to it are all private organisations, but again HMG gets the good publicity but at no cost to them.