Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Interesting Jag defect, how it was corrected and how BAe appeared to claim credit for

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Interesting Jag defect, how it was corrected and how BAe appeared to claim credit for

Old 12th Dec 2017, 01:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,742
Received 2,726 Likes on 1,159 Posts
Interesting Jag defect, how it was corrected and how BAe appeared to claim credit for

Watch the film and read the blurb.



Published on 30 Oct 2016This is the story of how a Jaguar aircraft of the Indian Air Force was saved and an important defect discovered.

As a follow up of this story here is what I heard from a retired Indian Air Force officer who was peripherally involved:

"Let me clarify that the BAe initially told the IAF that our modification was not the right one and they would not be responsible for any mishaps. But we stuck to our stand as our test pilots and technical staff had gone through the entire modification and confirmed its veracity. A few days later, there was a similar incident in the RAF and they were able to recover the aircraft by following our drill - putting the battery off and then selecting the undercarriage down. A few months later, there was an air show, I think at Dubai. BAe representative there boasted how quick they were to come up with a modification after the incident. Fortunately, one of the representative from HAL was there within hearing distance. He immediately pointed out that it was an Indian modification (we had come up with the solution within two weeks while the British guys were clueless for more than three months) and the British had just copied it and given their own name!"
NutLoose is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 10:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
That's BAE for you...

Clever HAL chap by the way and a cool pilot..
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 11:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
If the indians were so clever how come they didn't try the process until the aeroplane was down to 3 mins of fuel?

PDR
PDR1 is online now  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 11:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lend me your watch and I will tell you the time.
dragartist is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 11:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
If BAe were so smart why wasn't this in the AFM??
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 11:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On the face of it, BAE should have given India a new Jag and paid for the repair to the second. And taken all involved to a decent dinner after gongs were distributed
Intellectual property? I don't think so.
Basil is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 11:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 257
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by PDR1
If the indians were so clever how come they didn't try the process until the aeroplane was down to 3 mins of fuel?

PDR
Necessity is the mother of invention?
dagenham is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2017, 12:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
The point being that if the solution was so bleeding obvious why was it that it didn't occur to anyone for the nearly 3 hours of in-flight investigations beforehand?

It clearly wasn't something that happened on every flight, or even that frequently (how many Jag fleet hours had there been before these incidents), and it must have been something really wierd if it even inhibited the nitrogen system (I'm not a Jag man so I could be wrong in assuming it has one). Having dealt with the indians on other aircraft it wouldn't surprise me if they didn't relase incident data to the DA (so the DA had no data on which to conduct an investigation) and/or declined to authorise a PDS task to look into it.

PDR
PDR1 is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.