Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Finnish Fighter Competition

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Finnish Fighter Competition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2017, 20:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KenV
There appears to be some confusion. There's zero doubt that Russia, the US, the UK, France, Germany, China, and basically any nation that exports military gear could and likely would withdraw support of those weapons under certain political conditions. The REAL question is whether those "conditions" are more likely to arise for the Finns from the Americans, the Europeans, or the Russians. The answer is obvious.

And this ignores the difficulty Russian industry has in providing through life support to their own armed forces in the first place. Never mind to export customers.
Actually, export customers provide real money, sometimes better than the national government.
Obviously that can lead to more abuse, requiring expensive overhauls too often a simple example. So careful contracts are essential unless one has ample political clout.
That said, Finland was a Grand Duchy of Russia until 1917, so there are lots of very long term relationships. Finland has prospered as a bridge between Russia and the west, it has no experience as an armed outpost aimed at Russia, not even during the coldest days of the cold war.
etudiant is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2017, 15:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As mentioned by the topic starter, an idea regarding F-18 or Grippen looks very reasonable. Either one of the most reliable companies in the world in that business segment (which they have experience with), or a neighbour (that might be transparent for them to a large extent).

And I do not see any "militaristic" aspect here at all. If they were really afraid of "Russian invasion", they would spend their budget to buy PAC-3, MLRS (against "invading" land forces), Javelins, Apaches and so on, but not fighter aircraft as they cannot intercept modern (or yet to come) missiles and munitions. Looking at the map one can easily see that Russian AF do not need to enter their airspace to strike. Are they (Finns) going to enter ours? I don't think so.

IMHO the reality is that their current fleet is running out of lifespan and a replacement is needed. Nothing more. If they have AF (and not a bad one), they prefer to keep it at a certain level to maintain a certain status.

For Russia, the best option would be their purchase of F-35. Would be a great complimentary add-on for training of radar guys :-)
A_Van is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2017, 15:56
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I'm sure Vlad is thankful to you HH for making his argument."

one I've heard from a lot of Finns while working in Helsinki TBH - they have a more nuanced view of their neighbour having spent a lot of time watching them

Dosn't mean to say they wouldn't fight - the Russians know they would so why bother............ taking over Finland isn't going to change any strategic variable that would make the losses worthwhile
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2017, 02:24
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Sorry Van, hard to overlook Vlad's belligerence as a part of the equation.
West Coast is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 07:01
  #25 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,381
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
AW&ST:

Finland Plans War Games for Fighter Contenders

Finland is gearing up to hold a simulated war game to test the candidates for its future fighter requirement. The exercise, dubbed the HX Challenge, will “verify what the candidates have said and promised in their answers,” HX Program Director Lauri Puranen wrote in a blog published on the Finnish Air Force’s website Sept. 9.......

The challenge will test the mettle of five platforms entered into the tender, with the event planned to take place in the depths of the Finnish winter in January-February at Tampere-Pirkkala AB, home to one of the Finnish Air Force’s F/A-18 wings.

Puranen says the that the HX Challenge will only be focused on the technical part of the evaluation and will not “determine the ranking of candidates.” HX candidates are being scored based on security of supply, cost, industrial collaboration and performance........

The call for tenders, ongoing since January, is now in its third and final round, with negotiations due to be completed later this month, Puranen reports. An invitation to tender will be issued by the end of the year, leading to the HX Challenge. A final selection decision will be made in 2021.



ORAC is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 13:13
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
With the Finns and the Swiss independently opting for the F-18C Hornet last time around, it will be interesting to see if both countries again select the same aircraft type once they have concluded their evaluation/selection process this time.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 3rd May 2021, 08:54
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
The bids are in.

https://www.airforce-technology.com/...ter-programme/

everyone is coupling something with the offer,
Superhornets with growlers, Gripens with GlobalEyes, F-35's with development/manufacturing, Typhoons with jobs and Rafales with... dunno, red wine?
Beamr is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2021, 13:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Latest news: Boeing announced today that their offer includes option to buy Loyal Wingman drones on top of the 64 Super hornets/Growlers, all within the budget.

So as LM announced earlier that their offer is up to 64 F35's within 10bn€ (in essence offering F35's on the same price range with 4th gen competitors), Boeing is matching the raise. My uneducated guess is that Boeing is trying to avoid the Swiss decision of buying F35's at all costs.

This is evolving to be rather interesting. The winner is to be announced later this year.
Beamr is online now  
Old 5th Dec 2021, 16:41
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Fresh off the local press: the Finnish Defence Forces will recommend the F35 to the MoD to be the next fast jet for the Finnish Air Force.
The recommendation is based on capability, long life span beyond 2060, counter purchases and *dramaric drumming here*... the costs of purchase and use.
To recount: up to 64 airframes with price cap of 10 billion euros and maximum annual operating costs of 250 million euros.

Whats next? The recommendation is presented by MoD to the Government, which has the final word on the matter. However, I would be amazed if the politicians would walk over the pros involved in the process for nearly a decade.
Once the government has stamped the decision, the first one to know is the government of the selling country, ie. U.S. government, and then made public. Afterwards there will be more info on the evaluation process and how different vendors coped.

Short version: based on news today the FDF recommends the F35, final decision before christmas.
Beamr is online now  
Old 5th Dec 2021, 17:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
Fresh off the local press: the Finnish Defence Forces will recommend the F35 to the MoD to be the next fast jet for the Finnish Air Force.
The recommendation is based on capability, long life span beyond 2060, counter purchases and *dramaric drumming here*... the costs of purchase and use.
To recount: up to 64 airframes with price cap of 10 billion euros and maximum annual operating costs of 250 million euros.

Whats next? The recommendation is presented by MoD to the Government, which has the final word on the matter. However, I would be amazed if the politicians would walk over the pros involved in the process for nearly a decade.
Once the government has stamped the decision, the first one to know is the government of the selling country, ie. U.S. government, and then made public. Afterwards there will be more info on the evaluation process and how different vendors coped.

Short version: based on news today the FDF recommends the F35, final decision before christmas.
Not surprising.
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2021, 20:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
Sounds like finland got some very interesting deals offered up. Gripen + global eye. Super hornet + growler + loyal wingman + aim260
rattman is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2021, 22:34
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
The aim260 has never been mentioned (how does one offer something that does not exist). But as the aim120 is not mentioned either, most probable answer is that the aim260 is bundled along with the offer, one way or another. And with both US offers.
Beamr is online now  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 11:37
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Just announced, the F35 won.

https://yle.fi/news/3-12224265
Beamr is online now  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 12:38
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
What is noteworthy though is that Typhoon and Rafale did not meet the tender requirements in their final offers! In the end there were only F35, Super Hornet and Gripen in between which the choice was made.

it is for now unclear in which categories exactly the Typhoon and Rafale did not meet the tender requirements, expecting that info to be available later.
Beamr is online now  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 14:51
  #35 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
I think Finland made the correct call. The other contenders weren't good enough. Hope the eventually get Meteor and ASRAAM
Navaleye is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 17:28
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,575
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
Finnish Air Force Press Release:
The Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II is Finland’s next multi-role fighter - The Finnish Air Force (ilmavoimat.fi)
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 17:33
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never in doubt. F35 is the only gig in town. It would be interesting to see what the Typhoon offer was in terms of the airframe, such as conformal tanks…
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2021, 21:27
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 392
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
The Typhoon and Rafale never made it past the gate and were excluded in the finale choice.
golder is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.