Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

David Davis demanded RAF plane for Brexit talks.

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

David Davis demanded RAF plane for Brexit talks.

Old 22nd Nov 2017, 06:02
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would it "serve him right"?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 09:23
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Age: 79
Posts: 547
Received 45 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
'Different budgets', I believe is the expression.

Back when VVIPs used the VC10 for overseas jaunts, the Foreign Office only repaid a fraction of the true cost - so for every such flight the MoD budget suffered a loss.

Perhaps it's different now?
Perhaps it is.

Like it or not Brexit is happening so let's give David Davis everything he needs to make things easier for him to negotiate the very best deal possible, in comparison with the "Divorce bill" the cost of RAF Air transport is fractions of peanuts.

......and since you are prattling on about the German concept of plebiscite prohibition, take a look at the Swiss system, which is such an integral part of the hugely successful, peaceful, and prosperous country.
RetiredBA/BY is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 09:30
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
IMHO Davis is waste of oxygen, appears to have no idea of the concept of negotiation and could not negotiate his way out of a wet paper bag - only saying......
Wander00 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 10:17
  #44 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,696
Received 49 Likes on 23 Posts
A 52/48 split based on lies misdirection and bull**** is not what I'd call democratic
Whereas the Remain campaign was a model of truth and good humour.

I can't be @rsed to find some of Gideon Osborne's (yes - that's his real name) more dire predictions.... err ......none of which seem to have happened.
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 10:23
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 75
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by teeteringhead
Whereas the Remain campaign was a model of truth and good humour.

I can't be @rsed to find some of Gideon Osborne's (yes - that's his real name) more dire predictions.... err ......none of which seem to have happened.
Other than that since the referendum the UK growth has gone from top to bottom of the G7 list and the PSBR has risen exponentially whilst the £ has fallen by more than one-fifth -- leading to high inflation on imported food, to say nothing of the Government having lost its majority in the HoC and faces the real prospect of losing the next election to the most left wing Government in the history of Parliament.
roving is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 10:40
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
Well I am no fan of Davis either in terms of politics or competence although he does, rather belatedly seemed to have learned that all this 'European Nonsense' isnt nonsense and isnt straightforward.

However he is the minister responsible for something very important and an RAF jet seems fine to me in these circumstances.. Of course if Boris or Gove are involved I suggest the Airlander as singularly appropriate.

As for all this idiocy about Lancasters and Germany that sort of attiude got us into this Brexit mess, it was over 70 years ago who is the better off nation nowadays
pax britanica is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 10:45
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I doesn't matter whether you like/dislike Davis or what your views are on Brexit. He is a senior government minister and should use the appropriate transport which I thought would be, in this case, 32.
Parson is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 11:22
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
I can't be @rsed to find some of Gideon Osborne's (yes - that's his real name) more dire predictions.... err ......none of which seem to have happened.
They haven't happened yet, because we haven't left yet.

......and since you are prattling on about the German concept of plebiscite prohibition, take a look at the Swiss system, which is such an integral part of the hugely successful, peaceful, and prosperous country.
Ah, the Swiss system https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...A4H05920140518

Perhaps this could be our post-Brexit model of government? I'm sure the great British public will appreciate the importance of airborne maritime patrol and all the rest of it.

(Managed to get it back to military aviation there, just).
melmothtw is online now  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 11:58
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Age: 79
Posts: 547
Received 45 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
They haven't happened yet, because we haven't left yet.



Ah, the Swiss system https://www.reuters.com/article/us-s...A4H05920140518

Perhaps this could be our post-Brexit model of government? I'm sure the great British public will appreciate the importance of airborne maritime patrol and all the rest of it.

(Managed to get it back to military aviation there, just).
Perhaps the British could be persuaded to have a decent maritime patrol capability, and a more capable military, if an intelligent government could tell the facts in a decent programme of education.

The French government persuaded the French people to accept nuclear electricity generation and now over 85 % of the electricity is so generated and independent of overseas oil. It was achieved and now it's just accepted as an excellent source of their power.
RetiredBA/BY is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 12:50
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The French and German governments invest... Simples.
Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 15:41
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 1,094
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Beagle

See what you started? Hardly a week goes by without you ranting about Brexit and hurling insults at Cameron for 'granting' a referendum ( for which 544 MPs voted yes to hold a Yes/NO vote ), the leaders of the Leave Camp and all those of us who voted to leave.

I wasn't going to continue replying to your garbage but if you think people like me were hoodwinked by Davies, Gove and Johnson then you really need your head examined! I and many of my friends have been anti-EU ( not Europe, Germany or Europeans! ) since Gove and Johnson were in short trousers.
Brian 48nav is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 16:28
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Noted...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BEagle is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 19:44
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
I have been anti-EU for decades, and voted Remain. There, I've said it.

However we need up where we are is somewhat irrelevant, as it is now a Fact.

The use of No. 32 (The Royal) Squadron by Cabinet Ministers [in addition to Royalty] is what it exists for.

Can we have a Referendum on whether this quasi-political Thread should die?
MPN11 is online now  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 19:53
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,812
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
Why would it "serve him right"?
Have you ever flown in the RAF Jetstream Mk1 with Astazou engines?
Sure before they were withdrawn the FAA Mk 2 s were used for VIPs but they had Garretts.
chevvron is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 20:32
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,243
Received 616 Likes on 224 Posts
We are where we are.

Blame, recriminations, insults, threats, are not going to help any of us [us = all the inhabitants and temporary inhabitants of the UK] find a way forward to a post-Brexit era that is as good as [or least bad as] it can be.

Meantime I believe the BBC is shockingly biased and seemingly inent on dragging us all down with the ship. And if we go down, apart from the dubious satisfaction of saying "we told you so" where is the mileage in that posture?
langleybaston is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 21:32
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: pluto
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I find dispiriting is people taking the side of an EU who now wishes our country economic harm.

There are no excuses for holding that position.
blimey is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 23:28
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The economic harm will happen regardless of what we think. Any of you lot had to deal with crap of customs movement of stuff recently? I have and what a pain in the butt, arguing whom is going to pay a bill.
Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 06:17
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
What I find dispiriting is people taking the side of an EU who now wishes our country economic harm.

There are no excuses for holding that position.
They DON'T wish our country economic harm, they want the best economic deal for them (this is a completely logical position to hold, and is the same position that the UK holds - how are people surprised at this?!).

The fact that Brexit will cause the UK economic harm is not the EU's fault, it is ours alone.

Meantime I believe the BBC is shockingly biased and seemingly inent on dragging us all down with the ship. And if we go down, apart from the dubious satisfaction of saying "we told you so" where is the mileage in that posture?
The BBC's job is to tell us the facts, not to tell us what we want to hear. There is no upside to Brexit, which is why they are not reporting one.

Harrier, VC10, Lightning - there, some military aviation to keep everyone happy (ish).
melmothtw is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 06:50
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,364
Received 508 Likes on 143 Posts
What I love (!) about threads like this is that everybody believes wholeheartedly that they are right. They also believe it is their duty to try to change the mind of anyone who disagrees with them.

The government asked us a question and we (who voted) gave our answers. Job done.

The fact is nobody knows what happens next. It might be the best decision we ever made. It might be the end of Britain as we know it.

Whining changes nothing. It just gets very boring.

Can we change the record now?

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 06:56
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
You're quite right Bob (speaking as someone who is as guilty as anyone). As I've said on a previous thread a long time ago, the internet is good for two things - arguing with strangers, and looking at pictures of cats.

I like cats.
melmothtw is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.