Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New big German-French Fighter Bomber under development

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New big German-French Fighter Bomber under development

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2017, 01:12
  #41 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are they going to paint them white?
Farrell is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 02:39
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps AfD will allocate them to the Grenzschutze to shoot illegal migrants
ShotOne is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 05:27
  #43 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
“Control platform for UAV’s...” Seriously? Why would one spend a trillion dollars for something which could be done from a portakabin?
Frankly, at this stage it’s a buzzword bingo list of all the latest salesmen pitches......

AW&ST: .......”The Franco-German fighter, details of which first emerged in July during a meeting of the Franco-German council of ministers, would feature “enhanced capabilities” in terms of range, persistence, electronic warfare, survivability, situational awareness and weapons capability. Artificial Intelligence would also play a major role, the officials said.

Airbus has begun detailing its take on the German requirements with a family of manned and unmanned platforms in which the manned aircraft act as command-and-control platforms. Swarming fleets of unmanned combat air vehicles carrying sensors, jamming equipment and weaponry could be launched by Airbus A400M airlifters and directed into action by the fighter jet.

“Fifth-generation aircraft will have to do some [command and control], and if you operate four of them together, you can achieve some air superiority,” says Antoine Noguier, head of strategy at Airbus Defense and Space. “This [future] fighter needs to go beyond that, with a combination of low-observability and long range; it will need to crunch data internally to provide local and distributed [command-and-control] perspective on other effectors.”

Open software architectures to allow easy upgrading of onboard systems and a directed-energy weapon were also necessities for the new aircraft, Noguier says.”.......
ORAC is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 07:23
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolutely!!

....and with everyone trying to get their snouts in the trough................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 10:09
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK, if one forgets (thankfully) about BAe, the only company with design and construction capability is Bombardier.
When Bombardier bought Shorts in 1989 they made absolutely sure that all overall design, assembly, flight test and marketing skills dispensed with - apparently in response to Canadian union/political pressures to ensure that there would be no threat to these capabilities held by DHC and Canadair (as they then were). Shorts became a (very successful) sub-assembly designer and manufacturer but getting back into the overall design, manufacture and assembly of something as sophisticated as a fifth / sixth generation fighter would be an exceptionally tall order.
Torquelink is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 10:22
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Going deeper underground
Age: 55
Posts: 332
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Hilarious as it may sound the F-35 is the F-16 cheap replacement, supposedly being less expensive both to buy and maintain. Go figure.

The next generation USAF fighter, the PCA, is the high end of the high/low mix and is the planned F-22 replacement....
But if LM manages to replace every F16 in the world with export versions of F35A, then the unit cost of that variant will be very much lower than the Bs or Cs, and the programme cost would be far lower than developing a different replacement from scratch.
orgASMic is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 11:42
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
Absolutely!!

....and with everyone trying to get their snouts in the trough................
Isn't that the NATO east European expansion construction gig?
glad rag is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 16:24
  #48 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
Absolutely!!

....and with everyone trying to get their snouts in the trough................





Correct, everyone wants to be friends now. I guess the Germans have learned their lessons though. If they are gonna pay, they want what They need in time, at budget. No NH90/ Typhoon kind of multination/ industries drama's. The French they can use, the rest can be second tier supplier / customer.
keesje is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 17:11
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by keesje



Correct, everyone wants to be friends now. I guess the Germans have learned their lessons though. If they are gonna pay, they want what They need in time, at budget. No NH90/ Typhoon kind of multination/ industries drama's. The French they can use, the rest can be second tier supplier / customer.
We're now in the real of total fiction imho.
No large defense program has ever come in on budget or on time afaik.
The normal experience in the US used to be 100% overrun, some much worse.
Here the challenges are well above average, so experience would suggest well above average delay and cost growth as well.
etudiant is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 23:55
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 467
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
My personal preference is for small and agile, not expensive and capable of all, just the task at hand.
If it means UAV's that's fine, we're leaving the realm of pilot capability with extreme speed and G forces, so let's have tiny tactical stingers, capable of supersonic speed and with the ability to mount an array of weapons, defensive or offensive.

There are spotty kids out there that may be the generation we need if a global war were to break out, not aircraft nd crew costing squillions of pounds that won't be able to get to their targets.
Icare9 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 00:24
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
We're now in the real of total fiction imho.
No large defense program has ever come in on budget or on time afaik.
The normal experience in the US used to be 100% overrun, some much worse.
Here the challenges are well above average, so experience would suggest well above average delay and cost growth as well.
If he could, I think Kelly Johnson might disagree with you...
tartare is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 07:22
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They may also be thinking about export markets (the French will for sure)

The F-35 is too expensive and probably restricted, the F-22 is out of production and REALLY restricted and any F-22 replacement will be unbelievably expensive and never exported.

Anything Russian or Chinese is relatively unreliable and not competitive (yet)

A lot of countries will be faced with replacing all those F-16's, F-18's F-15's, MiG 29's & Mirages and quite a few of them are not poor and will be serious regional players by 2030-2040
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 10:56
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by orgASMic
But if LM manages to replace every F16 in the world with export versions of F35A, then...
..we can all fly pigs?

Seriously, I don't think there is a single customer out there who will replace F-16s with F-35 on a one-to-one basis. For most, perhaps all, export countries the eye-watering cost of the F-35 has lead to a cut in overall aircraft numbers when compared to their F-16 fleet. Even if the unit price were similar the bespoke and expensive facilities needed to support the F-35 have made quite a dint in the budget.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 10:59
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
could feature “enhanced capabilities” in terms of range, persistence, electronic warfare, survivability, situational awareness and weapons capability. Artificial Intelligence would also play a major role, the officials said.
So does that mean, it persistently breaks down, is aware it has broke down and when realising the threat is great, it turns and runs away utilising its enhanced range while dumping its own weapons to increase its speed, thus ensuring it survives?

Last edited by NutLoose; 23rd Nov 2017 at 11:10.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:07
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Germany looks to develop its own sixth generation stealth fighter jet | Defence Blog



It does look very much like a two seat F22 though

NutLoose is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:10
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,844 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Though I do wonder if it will cost as much as the

NutLoose is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:29
  #57 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Yes, apart from the configuration, two man cockpit, wingshape, functional specification, engines and tail, the nose is a kind of pointy too.
keesje is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:32
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,315
Received 54 Likes on 29 Posts
But they are a very similar shade of grey - surely that clinches it as a straight copy...

PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 14:58
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tartare
If he could, I think Kelly Johnson might disagree with you...
Afaik, he worked for the CIA, rather than under DoD rules, in the 1950s. Is there a more recent counterexample?
etudiant is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 18:40
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Afaik, he worked for the CIA, rather than under DoD rules, in the 1950s. Is there a more recent counterexample?
Fairly sure he worked for Lockheed who had contracts with various agencies.
Bing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.