Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New big German-French Fighter Bomber under development

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New big German-French Fighter Bomber under development

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 19:04
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bing
Fairly sure he worked for Lockheed who had contracts with various agencies.
Just so.
Lockheed was his employer and he designed the U-2 under a government contract for the CIA. The USAF and DoD had no role afaik in the management or supervision of the work. Nor did Lockheed line management, it was Johnson and his selected engineers and workforce.
etudiant is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 20:02
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Just so.
Lockheed was his employer and he designed the U-2 under a government contract for the CIA. The USAF and DoD had no role afaik in the management or supervision of the work. Nor did Lockheed line management, it was Johnson and his selected engineers and workforce.
He designed a lot more than the U-2 - the C-130,for example. He said they would probably sell no more than 100 of them. Now at about 2,500 and counting..
melmothtw is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 21:47
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like he’s getting bigger

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EADS_Mako/HEAT
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2017, 12:26
  #64 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,481
Received 100 Likes on 57 Posts
They're flying in the same direction so...straight copy really.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2017, 19:51
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What am I missing.
Technology allows inexpensive quasi autonomous combat vehicles, so much so that ethicists are raising cogent questions about their morality, yet these military staffs are endorsing a massive fighter bomber concept that will make the F-35 appear a bargain.
Is technology a forbidden word in European military circles?

I don't see how such a 500MM E silver bullet item could ever be bought in quantity sufficient to be more than a footnote to military records.
etudiant is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2017, 07:26
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The planes are specc'd by guys whose whole life is about flying FJ's - if you say some spotty faced recruit sitting in a portakabin is going to replace them it strikes at their whole life and value system

You don't ask a barber if you need a haircut and you don't ask pilots if they want unmanned aircraft...........

(and just look elsewhere on PPrune to see the reaction of commercial pilots to the idea of one -man - or unmanned commercial 'planes................... )
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2017, 18:33
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
The planes are specc'd by guys whose whole life is about flying FJ's - if you say some spotty faced recruit sitting in a portakabin is going to replace them it strikes at their whole life and value system

You don't ask a barber if you need a haircut and you don't ask pilots if they want unmanned aircraft...........

(and just look elsewhere on PPrune to see the reaction of commercial pilots to the idea of one -man - or unmanned commercial 'planes................... )
Is that not why we have senior staff? People who are supposedly past the FJ stage of their lives and who try to maintain an effective military.
etudiant is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2017, 19:53
  #68 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
No, at that stage they’re putting in place arrangements for their directorships and vice-presidencies with the aircraft manufacturers....
ORAC is online now  
Old 26th Nov 2017, 11:27
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 553
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
I don't think this video has been posted before:

t43562 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2018, 10:05
  #70 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: netherlands
Age: 56
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...f-2018-9967606

Hoke said it was imperative to avoid mistakes made in the last big European military program, the troubled A400M military transporter, which has been plagued with cost overruns and technical challenges.

"It's important that the specifications (for the new fighter jet program) are developed with a sense of proportion," he said. He said it was important to "prevent requirements that are too comprehensive and that cannot be delivered by industry."
keesje is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2018, 16:31
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by keesje
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...f-2018-9967606

Hoke said it was imperative to avoid mistakes made in the last big European military program, the troubled A400M military transporter, which has been plagued with cost overruns and technical challenges.

"It's important that the specifications (for the new fighter jet program) are developed with a sense of proportion," he said. He said it was important to "prevent requirements that are too comprehensive and that cannot be delivered by industry."
Only way that will work is if the French design and build it and the Krauts are dumb enough to fund it.

Of course if it were to fall under the blessing of Schultz and Junkers et al.... lodsa mon€€€€y.....
glad rag is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 11:30
  #72 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,481
Received 100 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by glad rag
Of course if it were to fall under the blessing of Schultz and Junkers et al.... lodsa mon€€€€y.....
He knows nothing.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 06:23
  #73 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
France expects combat jet announcement at Berlin Air show: report

PARIS (Reuters) - France expects to take a “first significant step” in the development of a new European fighter jet with Germany later this month, Defence Minister Florence Parly said in remarks published on Thursday...... Parly said that ongoing “active talks” should result in an announcement at the ILA Berlin Air Show from April 25-29........

“On a political level, discussions between the French and German teams are intense. The industrial groups are working well together and now we have to ensure the two processes come together,” Parly told La Tribune newspaper.

A French defense ministry source, speaking before Parly met her German counterpart Ursula von der Leyen, said the two sides would sign a high level common operational requirements document in Berlin, a 10-page document that outlines the basic needs of the two militaries. After that the companies involved - Dassault, MBDA, Thales and Safran on the French side and Airbus on the German side - would spend just under a year working separately on technical specifications before agreeing a common contract to work together.

“This proves wrong the people that said France and Germany couldn’t work together on defense projects,” the source said. It was too early to talk about including other EU partners in the project, she said. The source said France and Germany wanted to push the project forward quickly before bringing others on board.......

“We are looking at first delivery by 2040 to replace the Eurofighter and to prepare for a future beyond the Rafale,” the source said. “The industrial studies will start this year autonomously so that we can try to start to work together next year with a view to launching the program in the 2020s.”.....

Germany’s defense ministry did not immediately respond for comment.
ORAC is online now  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 06:26
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Mais, sera-t-il habité...?
tartare is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 07:02
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by keesje
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...f-2018-9967606

Hoke said it was imperative to avoid mistakes made in the last big European military program, the troubled A400M military transporter, which has been plagued with cost overruns and technical challenges.

"It's important that the specifications (for the new fighter jet program) are developed with a sense of proportion," he said. He said it was important to "prevent requirements that are too comprehensive and that cannot be delivered by industry."

That's a principal that should be at the top of every RFP in any country
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 12:02
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Skerry
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, that's what everyone tries to do. But as for the history of defense acquisition reform...

George K Lee is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 12:36
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Love that French statement. "Replace Eurofighter" is a thinly disguised dig at the jet, suggesting it will be obsolete, while "prepare for a future beyond Rafale" infers it will not need replacing at the same time/before Typhoon.....

My bet is that this will go the same way as the proposed Franco/German Heavy Lift Helicopter of 2010; an idea that effectively subsidises industry for a couple of years but delivers an output that is clearly unaffordable. Germany will then pull out and go its own way (hence the CH-47F/CH-53K purchase..) and the French will do what they did when they pulled out of the FEFA project and try to design their own aircraft.......
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 16:41
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
Love that French statement. "Replace Eurofighter" is a thinly disguised dig at the jet, suggesting it will be obsolete, while "prepare for a future beyond Rafale" infers it will not need replacing at the same time/before Typhoon.....
FWIW:
To infer is to draw a conclusion based on non stated evidence.
A statement that presents evidence designed to cause another to come to a certain conclusion is to imply.
KenV is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 17:40
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Seeing as this is a rumour network I did hear a rumour of the return of the fast jet WSO with UK FCAS some time later next decade. Anyone else heard that?
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2018, 17:47
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by George K Lee
Well, that's what everyone tries to do. But as for the history of defense acquisition reform...

Absolutely!!!
Heathrow Harry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.