Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Major new plan for (in old money) RAF North Luffenham.

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Major new plan for (in old money) RAF North Luffenham.

Old 29th Sep 2017, 13:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Major new plan for (in old money) RAF North Luffenham.

http://www.stamfordmercury.co.uk/news/major-plan-to-convert-army-base-into-village-1-8171198

"Plans have been revealed to build a village on the site of an Army base which is set for closure in 2021. Rutland County Council and the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO), part of the Ministry of Defence, are working together to develop a scheme for the future of the land on which St George’s Barracks, at North Luffenham, currently sits it was revealed on Monday. The Army’s 1st Military Working Dogs and 2 Medical Regiment is to leave the 700 acre site within four years as part of the Defence Estate Optimisation strategy (DEO). The DEO aims to save the MoD money by releasing current military land nationally with the potential for 160,000 new homes by 2020.

The land will be developed as a stand alone village and would not be an extension of Edith Weston or North Luffenham. A survey of any minerals on the site which would need to be removed will be carried out too. Leader of the council, Councillor Tony Mathias (Con), said: “This is a wonderful opportunity. “Early discussions between the council and MoD have been extremely positive and have fostered a genuine appetite to work together as part of an innovative new approach. “We are starting now to flesh out the details.” Part of the land, formerly known as RAF North Luffenham, is where PGM-17 Thor Missiles were stored between 1959-63 in the Cold War."
Al R is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2017, 15:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks like a good use of a square mile of land TBH - better than greenfield anyway
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2017, 17:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 505
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ISTR the RCAF had an F86 Wing' there in the 1950s'.
aw ditor is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2017, 18:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,705
Received 2,707 Likes on 1,148 Posts
Damned good idea, it reminds me of Witham St Hughes... Not heard of it? Well it is the new village they built on Swinditz and while sad when I visited to see the old domestic area had gone, it was heartening to see a new intake of people to the area who can walk around with their hands in their pockets..

Swinditz now

Transformation of a former RAF base into the new village of Witham St Hugh?s | Strawsons Property
NutLoose is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2017, 19:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Closer than you think...
Age: 65
Posts: 390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could be good, and there's real potential to make some serious money. Unfortunately DIO are involved......

No doubt some lucky national developer will pick the land up for pennies and then turn it around for pounds.

It would be nice if the DIO could run the whole project from start to finish in house and sell on the completed homes to maximise income for the estate but to be honest at times you'd think they couldn't project manage a kids homework project!

Another good idea would be to build the homes to sell at a discount to public servants such as NHS, Serving/Ex Forces, Fire, Police etc...

Or do the lot as a massive self build project.
Always a Sapper is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2017, 21:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the wife
Posts: 371
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Damned good idea, it reminds me of Witham St Hughes... Not heard of it? Well it is the new village they built on Swinditz and while sad when I visited to see the old domestic area had gone, it was heartening to see a new intake of people to the area who can walk around with their hands in their pockets..

Swinditz now

Transformation of a former RAF base into the new village of Witham St Hugh?s | Strawsons Property

Junior daughter lives in Witham St Hugh's. She likes living there although the developers crammed in as many houses as they could and on-street parking is a nightmare.
4mastacker is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 07:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Thor missile sites at North Luffenham have Grade II* listed status. It will be interesting to see how they are to be protected by this proposed development. I hope that the MoD will require the developer to do something beyond simply the minimum which, I presume, is simply to not damage them. However, with several hundred new houses close by, if the sites are freely accesible and/or negelected they will probably become a focal point for "anti-social" behaviour.
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 07:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Brain Potter
The Thor missile sites at North Luffenham have Grade II* listed status. It will be interesting to see how they are to be protected by this proposed development. I hope that the MoD will require the developer to do something beyond simply the minimum which, I presume, is simply to not damage them. However, with several hundred new houses close by, if the sites are freely accesible and/or negelected they will probably become a focal point for "anti-social" behaviour.
Do what archeologists have done for decades; record, then bury under tonnes of spoil until they become interesting again.
diginagain is online now  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 09:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Age: 65
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by BigGreenGilbert
Did anyone really ever refer to RAF Swinderby as Swinditz?
Yes. (.... and some dots to make up 10 characters)
Dan Gerous is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 10:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 49 Likes on 18 Posts
No doubt the houses will be the same identikit rabbit hutches that are being thrown up all around the country. Does nobody in such circles have any imagination?
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 11:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well if you talk to builders and estate agents they always tell you that the English are hideously conservative when it comes to housing. There is a real issue in living in a house different from the neighbours. In places like the USA or Oz people want something different - but not in England.

Only a small part of the upper and middle classes will even consider a designer house
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 14:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you want identikit rabbit hutches be grateful you don't have the ticky-tacky houses they build on lotisments (in Vendee anyway). Mind you the price of the land is 15- 22€ a square metre, which is a bit different from UK. But you get cheap housing that way
Wander00 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 16:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Another characterless new village in the middle of nowhere is not an attractive prospect. I expect the local council are pandering to NIMBYs in existing villages by proposing this rather than building in currently inhabited areas. Witham St H is less attractive than the married patch that was there before, even after London's Burning filmed a season finale show there.
Established around 15 years now, there's still no discernable village centre.
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 17:08
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Once a Squirrel Heaven (or hell!), Shropshire UK
Posts: 836
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Sounds just like the DIO plan to build 600 houses on the old RAF Ternhill site when the army pull out in a couple of years time! Just houses; no schools, no shops, no public transport, no infrastructure - and the airfield will remain open for day and night flying by helicopters from DHFS and cadet gliding (!!!!!) at the weekends. What could go wrong?
Shackman is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2017, 20:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: cheshire
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's certainly a bumper time to be a landowner or a developer. Question is, once we've built on all the old airfields where is next - more on greenbelt, more edge of town sprawl, new towns (aka "garden villages")? At what point do we drop the "fake news" housing crisis description and admit what we really have is a population crisis?
andrewn is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2017, 08:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The sky mainly
Posts: 351
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
What are they going to do about the nuclear waste buried on the airfield?
They'll struggle to sell the houses when people find out about that!
Sky Sports is online now  
Old 1st Oct 2017, 11:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Houses will be ticky-tocky, not ticky-tacky........
Wander00 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2017, 12:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Have any of you doom and gloom merchants actually SEEN a modern housing development? They are diverse and interesting, not 70's style conformist little boxes.

And if any of you have ever tried actually developing such a site, you will know the requirements for local infrastructure and facilities that the developer has to either provide or fund, usually both.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2017, 12:57
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: LEIC
Posts: 96
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne
Have any of you doom and gloom merchants actually SEEN a modern housing development? They are diverse and interesting, not 70's style conformist little boxes.

And if any of you have ever tried actually developing such a site, you will know the requirements for local infrastructure and facilities that the developer has to either provide or fund, usually both.
I agree. I found this link ref the former RAF Brampton
https://www.dlpconsultants.co.uk/por...-redevelopment
ROC man is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2017, 14:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,963
Received 68 Likes on 26 Posts
We have three Thor installations a few miles away at Harrington. The bases and blast walls are substantially intact ( its a lot of concrete ! ) but no attempt to preserve them in any way nor provide any information about their purpose. Easily accessible as long as you avoid the crops and worth a look.
beamer is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.