It's still fun!!
I know, of COURSE you didn't! And, as I said earlier, am only joshing, and have tongue firmly inserted into cheek..
I know, of COURSE you didn't! And, as I said earlier, am only joshing, and have tongue firmly inserted into cheek...
Vietnam, mate went along on a F-100 (two seat) strike mission for a ride. Really impressed and cool he thought as an Army Bell 47 driver, having only Winjeel FW experience to go by. He then took the F-100 driver for a ride in his 47, who then thought RW was really cool. Green grass....?
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
237OCU, THAT place had quite a reputation!
But yes it did - an excellent one. The few naysayers on here are well-voiced, with their own specific reasons. I prefer the views of the large and silent majority that went through successfully; a few hundred of whom will meet again in December.
jindabyne,
Of COURSE hearsay! I was never on Buccs. But it WAS a reputation it had for a while and I heard it from a lot of folk who WERE on it, some for not very long...
Of COURSE hearsay! I was never on Buccs. But it WAS a reputation it had for a while and I heard it from a lot of folk who WERE on it, some for not very long...
Al-bert,
A Nav who knew how to fly? He/she must have got quite a way through pilot training before being chopped then?
A Nav who knew how to fly? He/she must have got quite a way through pilot training before being chopped then?
roving,
Oh please! When I said go away and educate yourself I didn't mean that Tory rag! That article has been rubbished in numerous places soI won't repeat the inaccuracies, falsehoods and sheer lack of understanding and knowledge that riddle the defence articles in it...
Oh please! When I said go away and educate yourself I didn't mean that Tory rag! That article has been rubbished in numerous places soI won't repeat the inaccuracies, falsehoods and sheer lack of understanding and knowledge that riddle the defence articles in it...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Banter
Originally Posted by [email protected]
moi aussi - the day the banter stops will be a sad one indeed.
If it's not fun, there's no point doing it (unless one is on short finals to a pension point!). Much as my job is an awfully long way from the sharp end, there are some people in civvy street who would jump at the chance to hop into a turbine helicopter more or less at a time of their choosing, and fly whatever profile they might wish to practise including low level, formation, mountains etc. Same with Tutor flying - how many people get to fling an aerobatic aircraft around the sky as often as they want, without paying a penny for the privilege? Far from punchy but it still has a certain allure.
In brief:
- More slots = greater chance of getting in
- Multi-engine
- Greater range of airframes (2x FJ, 4x RW, numerous ME)
- Greater scope to stay flying
- Higher flying rate
- Greater scope to restream (either from training or later in career)
Without overseas postings, what does the Royal Air Force offer recruits which is not offered by the Army or Royal Navy?
The Army has attack helicopters. The Navy will soon (once again) have fast jets and helicopters.
The Army has attack helicopters. The Navy will soon (once again) have fast jets and helicopters.
- More slots = greater chance of getting in
- Multi-engine
- Greater range of airframes (2x FJ, 4x RW, numerous ME)
- Greater scope to stay flying
- Higher flying rate
- Greater scope to restream (either from training or later in career)
TorqueOfTheDEvil,
But in the military you do NOT get to "hop into a turbine helicopter more or less at a time of their choosing" you do it, infrequently, when told to do it.
Again, nobody flings anything about in the military "as often as they want" it just does NOT work like that.
Can't argue with your list of reasons to choose the RAF though if you want to fly.
But in the military you do NOT get to "hop into a turbine helicopter more or less at a time of their choosing" you do it, infrequently, when told to do it.
Again, nobody flings anything about in the military "as often as they want" it just does NOT work like that.
Can't argue with your list of reasons to choose the RAF though if you want to fly.
the pilot in question had a very good 'pair of hands', it was his captaincy decisions which left a little to be desired - I guess a well trained border collie could have replaced the Nav!
TorqueOfTheDEvil,
But in the military you do NOT get to "hop into a turbine helicopter more or less at a time of their choosing" you do it, infrequently, when told to do it.
Again, nobody flings anything about in the military "as often as they want" it just does NOT work like that.
But in the military you do NOT get to "hop into a turbine helicopter more or less at a time of their choosing" you do it, infrequently, when told to do it.
Again, nobody flings anything about in the military "as often as they want" it just does NOT work like that.
"hop into a turbine helicopter more or less at a time of their choosing"?
That's exactly what I did for 22 years. Only time we were 'told to do it' was when it was a life saving 'job', and we all looked forward to that. We who were lucky enough to be part of that backwater rather liked it that way.
Tell THAT to the yoof of today!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: M4 Corridor
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went to the Squadron Association Dinner two weeks ago and I can report from the serving squadron members that Yes "It's still Fun". The chances for having a good time are somewhat fewer because there are fewer guys doing the job these days. Some years ago the C130K world was immense by today's standards having 60 odd airframes and by the mid 70s four squadrons worth of employment. I and the other well trained border collies on the Tac Support side of the airfield had the best of both worlds. Route flying was a means to get you into theatre and the challenge of low level ops in a different environment. Rhodesia, Ethiopia, The Middle East, Nevada and Alaska. Certain Captains would insist that you flew the aircraft for varying reasons and it all proved useful when recently training a Central African Air Force when the sole pilot instructor required assistance whilst changing seats. It has been said that a man whose job is also his hobby never does a day's work. Well that was my lot from 1976 till 2006. I'm not sure what that is in dog years.
Al-bert,
Nope, never on SAR helicopters, (never chopped...) a mere FJ type for my 2 tours. And now there is NOBODY in the military on SAR helicopters!
From what you describe it must have been a unique military existence, quite attractive actually, if you consider my original rather whinny post then the sort of flying you describe and the involvement and effort involved was what I was looking for. Apart from the shift work of course...
Nope, never on SAR helicopters, (never chopped...) a mere FJ type for my 2 tours. And now there is NOBODY in the military on SAR helicopters!
From what you describe it must have been a unique military existence, quite attractive actually, if you consider my original rather whinny post then the sort of flying you describe and the involvement and effort involved was what I was looking for. Apart from the shift work of course...
Yes,
I can confirm its still fun. Of course there are challenges and budgetary constraints hamper a lot of fun, but its still good.
There are still a lot of us who still serve who have been involved, directly or indirectly, in kinetic warfare. A far cry to constant training missions during the Cold War. That is not to say what happened then wasn't important, it was of course vitally important. Its not "fun", but its achieving tangible results.
A friend who has returned from observing OASC confirms that thankfully, there are a lot of people out there who are desperate to serve in the RAF.
I can confirm its still fun. Of course there are challenges and budgetary constraints hamper a lot of fun, but its still good.
There are still a lot of us who still serve who have been involved, directly or indirectly, in kinetic warfare. A far cry to constant training missions during the Cold War. That is not to say what happened then wasn't important, it was of course vitally important. Its not "fun", but its achieving tangible results.
A friend who has returned from observing OASC confirms that thankfully, there are a lot of people out there who are desperate to serve in the RAF.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
I would say the Vs were the coolest way to see the world, at least seeing applied to drivers. Long legs 3 hours quicker than the Brit and shorter legs than the 10 giving more night stop opportunities. Coolest way to get to Singapore with no SLF or movers to worry about.
Guest
Posts: n/a
And 5 flying tours in, 6 types as Captain, 30 odd types in the logbook and definitely having fun.