Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK - More defence cuts

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK - More defence cuts

Old 7th Sep 2017, 06:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK - More defence cuts

This morning's "Times" has the following immediate cuts - all budget driven to cover a £2 Bn a year "hole" in spending

Minehunters down from 15 to 13
Armoured training exercises in Canda down from 4 to 3 per year
Infantry training in Kenya down from 5 to 3 per year

This will save only £20 mm a year

12 Lynxes of 657 AAC used for Special Forces to be scrapped

Cabinet Office review currently looking at reducing F-35 deliveries by 2025 from 48 to 38 but as usual they claim "total purchase will remain unchanged".

This is the first stage in the well known path to "a maximum of .." then "Up to...." " then "buy x defer y" followed by "actually we can get by on 75|% of x".
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 06:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: RPVI
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone ever wonder if the MOD was vaccinated with a gramophone needle? Exactly the same old s**t every time....

If so, I hope it was a very blunt needle in the backside!
DANbudgieman is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 08:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,703
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Consequences of buying in $ with the pound at a historic low level?
Davef68 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 09:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 513
Received 156 Likes on 83 Posts
Consequence of being the only budget of any size where cuts can be made without howls of outrage from the masses.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 09:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised that they are still going ahead with the AH64E purchase when the current AH64D fleet is by no means worn out.
Vendee is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 09:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,289
Received 608 Likes on 266 Posts
Scrap the Wildcat and junk JHC - that would save millions and make everyone else in the helo world very happy.

The decision to scrap 657 Sqn is stupid and also old news.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 10:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vendee
It's VERY worn out.....there's also the legacy issue....I won't bore you.
Rotate too late is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 10:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
The exchange rate may be an immediate factor, but I think the simple fact is that despite the spending increase that politicians will happily remind us all about, the increase comes on the back of how many years worth of decreases and an overall budget that is insufficient to meet the UK's political aspirations. Dress it up how you like, but governments of all hues have underinvested and overstretched Defence terribly since the Wall came down and the fallacy of their peace dividend was revealed.

But if BREXIT goes badly, watch the exchange rate tank even further and this will not likely be the last immediate cut.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 11:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,118
Received 151 Likes on 77 Posts
Consequences of buying in $ with the pound at a historic low level?
In other words, consequence of Brexit.

But if BREXIT goes badly...
No 'if', it's already started as evidenced by this topic.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 12:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,289
Received 608 Likes on 266 Posts
Melmoth - agreed, all those leavers who seem to think it hasn't been as bad as warned haven't seen the half of it. We are tying up all the parlimentary time and effort with brexit at the very time we should be sorting the country out, the economy is tanking, we still have austerity to deal with.

What a stupid time to tear ourselves away from Europe - especially since the immigration issues aren't going to change and we are adopting all the European laws into British law - what on earth is it going to achieve?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 14:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
and we are adopting all the European laws into British law - what on earth is it going to achieve?
If we are to leave the EU (& we are) it is obvious that at least we start with a set of laws. We obviously cannot re-write all 3985 EU laws in a few days. So this is something to start with which can be changed later. That is what it is going to achieve.
sharpend is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 15:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 866
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will save the Conservative Party and that is all that matters.
DC10RealMan is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 15:35
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kilmarnock,United Kingdom
Age: 68
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"we still have austerity to deal with"

We chose not to by re-electing the Conservatives but with a much reduced majority. Continued austerity and efficiency measures rather than tax increases is the Policy pending Brexit unless we have another Referendum or Election.

With the two major Party's as divided as ever on the question of Europe, who knows what the next few years will bring. If we decided to change our mind and stay in, would the EU allow us to continue with all our opt outs and outside the Euro. I suspect not. It's a story that just runs and runs as it has done since 1973!
draken55 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 16:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by draken55
"we still have austerity to deal with"

We chose not to by re-electing the Conservatives but with a much reduced majority. Continued austerity and efficiency measures rather than tax increases is the Policy pending Brexit unless we have another Referendum or Election.

With the two major Party's as divided as ever on the question of Europe, who knows what the next few years will bring. If we decided to change our mind and stay in, would the EU allow us to continue with all our opt outs and outside the Euro. I suspect not. It's a story that just runs and runs as it has done since 1973!
I suspect not too. In fact, long term and assuming the EU survives, I think Sterling's future is bleak. The inevitable bid for re-entry when the current demographics and psephology shifts in favour of Remainers will see adoption of the Euro as a pre-condition. Unless we can mimic the Swedish approach to defence provision and sustainment and do more in house, then start to think about paying for the successor to F35 in Euros.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 17:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotate too late
Vendee
It's VERY worn out.....there's also the legacy issue....I won't bore you.
I beg to differ. I work on them daily. The airframes are in relatively good condition and they have fairly low airframe hours. They don't actually fly a lot these days.
Vendee is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 20:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
The decision to scrap 657 Sqn is stupid and also old news.
Crab - agreed, not sure it's that old news though!? Certainly in the public domain anyway...

Was particularly interested to hear that Puma will cover the role when they can't even support Kenya (and the Army pays through the nose for them)...
Politely_amused is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 21:32
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 289
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Melchett: Psephology, I had to look that up, must try to drop it in to conversation.
k3k3 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 21:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,289
Received 608 Likes on 266 Posts
Politely - yes it has been common knowledge in AAC circles for a few weeks.

I believe the Puma serviceability has been rather poor so no wonder they can't support the Army. Back to the 212s then
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 22:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vendee
I beg to differ. I work on them daily. The airframes are in relatively good condition and they have fairly low airframe hours. They don't actually fly a lot these days.
I get that Vendee, but they are tired, the RTM engines may have top of the tree once, but are now regarded as old tech. If you work on them, then you'll know, 1553 databuses are ancient, as are the WP's and SP's etc. The D is now superseded, if we keep going there will be no spares. The techs do an amazing job, but a lynx it ain't. Replacing a T6 gauge? Nope. Spares in the stores? Well i can assure you there isn't an abundance.
So I'm afraid I'll disagree, they are tired, as is the spares chain, the training pipeline.....etc.
Rotate too late is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2017, 23:08
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oh Gawd! The Remoaners are out in farce today.
In my lifetime the £ has varied from $4 to $1 so I'm pretty sanguine about it's future and, in the meantime, exports and the tourist trade are doing well.

Leaving the corrupt EU restores control of our fisheries, farming and immigration to Parliament.
The bogus argument that we are retaining EU laws fails to acknowledge that they can be altered at leisure. Contrary to Remoaner propaganda, immigration from outside the EU IS affected. For instance, deportees will, no longer, be able to take their case to the ECHR.

It seems to me that the multiple, mostly unelected, EU bodies are really worried about the loss of the UK contribution to their unaudited coffers. Juncker, the President of the EC, was PM of a country with half the population of Birmingham. You really couldn't make it up.

Of course it will take years to restore our great country to its former success and sovereignty but it will be worth it.

As for 'austerity' and social security money which could go to the mil; perhaps we should take a hard look at our 'could work, won't work' people and stop their tap. As my Scottish grandmother used to say: "Maun dae's a guid master." ('Must do' is a desirable discipline).
Basil is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.