FILLING THE RANKS
Thread Starter
FILLING THE RANKS
An interesting report, which highlights the parlous state of Armed Forces recruiting: https://www.markfrancois.com/sites/w...2026.07.17.pdf
The Regular strength of the UK Armed Forces is currently 138,350, 4.8% below the required number (liability). In the year to April 2017, 12,950 people joined the UK Regular Armed Forces but in the same period 14,970 left.
A combination of lower retention than expected and failure to achieve recruiting targets means this under manning is worsening and indeed has been for some time. The Royal Navy and the RAF are now running at around 10% short of their annual recruitment target, whilst for the Army the shortfall is over 30%. Constant pressure on recruiting budgets has only compounded the difficulty.
A combination of lower retention than expected and failure to achieve recruiting targets means this under manning is worsening and indeed has been for some time. The Royal Navy and the RAF are now running at around 10% short of their annual recruitment target, whilst for the Army the shortfall is over 30%. Constant pressure on recruiting budgets has only compounded the difficulty.
Doesn't surprise me - all you read on specialist military aviation themed forum boards these days is posts on how life in the RAF isn't a patch on the good old days.
Some great soundbites....
And the liberal snowflakes are going to love this one (quote not related to the one above!):
Some great soundbites....
There is a higher penetration of female officers at senior rank than for their BAME equivalents in the Armed Forces.
One way to address this would be to make the role of the Armed Forces a part of the national curriculum, so that every child leaving school will have at least a basic understanding of our Armed Forces and the role they play defending our nation.
As per para 7, 'retention issues are formally beyond the scope of this report', or words to that effect.
And there in a nut shell lies a goodly part of the problem. Recruit all you like, but if you can't get people to stay, or aren't flexible enough to keep people who are past certain ages or who are professional but not competitive for promotion, then you've only answered half the question.
And there in a nut shell lies a goodly part of the problem. Recruit all you like, but if you can't get people to stay, or aren't flexible enough to keep people who are past certain ages or who are professional but not competitive for promotion, then you've only answered half the question.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,808
Received 135 Likes
on
63 Posts
As per para 7, 'retention issues are formally beyond the scope of this report', or words to that effect.
And there in a nut shell lies a goodly part of the problem. Recruit all you like, but if you can't get people to stay, or aren't flexible enough to keep people who are past certain ages or who are professional but not competitive for promotion, then you've only answered half the question.
And there in a nut shell lies a goodly part of the problem. Recruit all you like, but if you can't get people to stay, or aren't flexible enough to keep people who are past certain ages or who are professional but not competitive for promotion, then you've only answered half the question.
How are you Melchy?!
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: raf
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem is the bean counters do not differentiate between bums on seats and suitably qualified and experienced personnel (SQEP).
They could recruit tons of spotty kids fresh out of school, but they won't know what they're doing for years. You can't beat experience for fault finding complex systems. On one aircraft type they reckon SQEP takes an additional two years on a Sqn after all training courses.
What would happen when they can't retain the SQEP? Cancel flying to have maintenance days ?
The problems could include constant ops in a main operating base and our lads and lasses still get **** accommodation and sub standard food not fit for purpose.
They could recruit tons of spotty kids fresh out of school, but they won't know what they're doing for years. You can't beat experience for fault finding complex systems. On one aircraft type they reckon SQEP takes an additional two years on a Sqn after all training courses.
What would happen when they can't retain the SQEP? Cancel flying to have maintenance days ?
The problems could include constant ops in a main operating base and our lads and lasses still get **** accommodation and sub standard food not fit for purpose.
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Regular strength of the UK Armed Forces is currently 138,350,
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's those pesky Beancounters again. I would have thought that with the RAF being run by senior Aircrew and Engineers who can do big sums, they would have been able to identify who these people are and put an end to their infernal meddling.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't suppose the situation will get any better when the bean counters have decided to lift the 1% cap on public sector pay for those "essential and valuable" people. who will be the ones at the back of the queue? Because they are not unionised and "there are no votes in defence" I offer three guesses but only one will be needed. Some of us are old and crusty enough to remember the fireman's strike when they pulled the Green Godesses out and the media discovered that the fireman were striking for a rise that was greater than a Private soldiers total salary. Oh boy did the proverbial hit the low tech air conditioning device!! Unfortunately it takes such a crisis and for the politicians and bureaucrats to see votes disappearing down the pan to concentrate their minds and something gets done. Until then the Forces will continue to bleed manpower faster than it can recruit/retain them and will become a uniformed training organisation where people sign on to get their qualifications and then go. Rant Over and Out.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And lots of Squadies found out, quit the army as soon as they could to do the easier job for more money.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: raf
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I feel that the lack of pay isn't the whole thing of leaving - or joining, for that matter!
The great and good of HMG and MOD have, through the systematic withdrawal of perks, privileges, pay and prospects, inevitably turned the former armed forces "Career" into a "job" that people quickly become bored with.
Add to that, the extremely slow promotion path of the RAF ground trades and lack of recognition for jobs with responsibilities and you have the almost perfect formula for driving people out as soon as they possibly can.
What's worse is that the armed forces are now perceived as a low paid job that can regularly put you in danger of being shot, in an unfriendly place too...nothing like the computer games at all!
Finally, I believe all this comes from people at HMG, living in the Chelsea/Notting Hill bubble and having never served in the forces or never had a proper 'career' before moving into politics - i.e. today's professional politicians and the pseudo politicians in MOD.
The great and good of HMG and MOD have, through the systematic withdrawal of perks, privileges, pay and prospects, inevitably turned the former armed forces "Career" into a "job" that people quickly become bored with.
Add to that, the extremely slow promotion path of the RAF ground trades and lack of recognition for jobs with responsibilities and you have the almost perfect formula for driving people out as soon as they possibly can.
What's worse is that the armed forces are now perceived as a low paid job that can regularly put you in danger of being shot, in an unfriendly place too...nothing like the computer games at all!
Finally, I believe all this comes from people at HMG, living in the Chelsea/Notting Hill bubble and having never served in the forces or never had a proper 'career' before moving into politics - i.e. today's professional politicians and the pseudo politicians in MOD.
I feel that the lack of pay isn't the whole thing of leaving - or joining, for that matter!
The great and good of HMG and MOD have, through the systematic withdrawal of perks, privileges, pay and prospects, inevitably turned the former armed forces "Career" into a "job" that people quickly become bored with.
Add to that, the extremely slow promotion path of the RAF ground trades and lack of recognition for jobs with responsibilities and you have the almost perfect formula for driving people out as soon as they possibly can.
What's worse is that the armed forces are now perceived as a low paid job that can regularly put you in danger of being shot, in an unfriendly place too...nothing like the computer games at all!
Finally, I believe all this comes from people at HMG, living in the Chelsea/Notting Hill bubble and having never served in the forces or never had a proper 'career' before moving into politics - i.e. today's professional politicians and the pseudo politicians in MOD.
The great and good of HMG and MOD have, through the systematic withdrawal of perks, privileges, pay and prospects, inevitably turned the former armed forces "Career" into a "job" that people quickly become bored with.
Add to that, the extremely slow promotion path of the RAF ground trades and lack of recognition for jobs with responsibilities and you have the almost perfect formula for driving people out as soon as they possibly can.
What's worse is that the armed forces are now perceived as a low paid job that can regularly put you in danger of being shot, in an unfriendly place too...nothing like the computer games at all!
Finally, I believe all this comes from people at HMG, living in the Chelsea/Notting Hill bubble and having never served in the forces or never had a proper 'career' before moving into politics - i.e. today's professional politicians and the pseudo politicians in MOD.
I've had such discussions with potential recruits.
CG
The great and good of HMG and MOD have, through the systematic withdrawal of perks, privileges, pay and prospects, inevitably turned the former armed forces "Career" into a "job" that people quickly become bored with
Add in the pension restructuring and changing flying pay to retention pay that takes forever to qualify for and you have some pretty good reasons for life in uniform being far less attractive than it was.
And don't get me started on boarding school allowance or the appalling maintenance of MQs and public buildings......
All well and good to highlight the conditions today - but how was Service life (all ranks) in for example, the mid-1930s (budget constraint-wise, reluctance to spend on new programmes etc etc) as a comparison?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lyneham Lad - All well and good to highlight the conditions today - but how was Service life (all ranks) in for example, the mid-1930s (budget constraint-wise, reluctance to spend on new programmes etc etc) as a comparison?
All well and good to suggest comparison but what about comparing where it all led to? A major conflict with totally unprepared Armed Forces thet took nearly three years to bring up to speed - we won't have the time if it happens again
All well and good to suggest comparison but what about comparing where it all led to? A major conflict with totally unprepared Armed Forces thet took nearly three years to bring up to speed - we won't have the time if it happens again